Lock

Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk

laugh.gif
@ Being more excited about Elijah Dukes than Andruw Jones...

Does Jones signing in LA make Andre Ethier or Kemp expendable? Or will they eat some of Pierre's deal to try and get him outta town?
Kemp name has been throwing around in all of the dodgers deals, so if kemp brings a pitcher he is gone. its going to be hard to find a team to takespierres contract
 
pimp.gif


the Blue Jays trotted out old-timers Lloyd Moseby and John Mayberry to model the team's new 1979 powder blue throwbacks, which will be worn for Friday home games.
2086598072_49db21bf8e.jpg
 
There is no way, no way, I'd give up Rich Hill right now. That kid is good, I hope like hell the Cubs don't actually dangle him out there toanybody. Roberts is fine, but not for a young lefty that is really showing improvement the last two years. Marshall is pretty good too, I'd like to holdon to him as well.

We always talkin to the O's.
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by Mez 0ne

Seems like Detroit wants to unload Dontrelle as well as Pudge to the Mets,m which shouldn't take much bargaining chips b/c Detroit wants the Mets to take most of the salary (the trade would probably start with Schneider).
if you read the most up to date news, a mets official was saying that this was being discussed before the tigers went public and announced the dealbeing finalized. the mets were trying to work something out before they did that. once detroit did what they did, NY feels as though the deal is dead due tothe fact that the tigers would take a HUGE PR hit after exciting the fans like this.

you never know though...

Does Jones signing in LA make Andre Ethier or Kemp expendable? Or will they eat some of Pierre's deal to try and get him outta town?

i can only imagine so. Kemp and Ethier's names been all over the rumor sheets this whole winter, i HOPE its NOT either of them. if anything, i want pierreto skip town for some decent 4th start, id even pay a nice chunk of his salary if it meant keeping Kemp in LA. like i said earlier, ideally, at the VERYleast, id want Coletti to revisit that reported rumor from a week or so involving the CHIsox having contreras for Pierre straight up.
 
Originally Posted by TheAndrea3000

Originally Posted by Carlos Tevez

Originally Posted by TheAndrea3000

It's Official all i want for Christmas is Tim Lincecum

I'd never trade Rios, he is the best player on the Jays, better than Wells. Rios can hit, run, play defense and is far more consistent than Wells. Lets not forget that he's earning around $2.5 million a season to put up Allstar numbers.

Yeah but him pretty sure his contract is expiring and I don't think J.P. is got remove his hands from his%!%# to pay him. Better to get something before we get Delgado'ed.

He's under contract until 2012. And Delgado didn't leave us, JP offered him stupid contract, like $5 million a season to stay with the team. Thennext season he goes out and gets Troy Glaus
sick.gif
We have the worst GM inbaseball.
 
I'd be good if they bring in Dontrelle but Pudge? Pudge is on a steep decline right now..

Anyways, I really dont think we're big players in the Santana race. Carlos Gomez or Fernando Martinez are the only ones teams are really checking for rightnow, not really Pelfrey or Humber. If I were the Twins, I'd wait it out til the last possible moment and bring back the Yanks in the fold and take the bestpossible deal.
 
I hope it was a good move, I really hope Andruw Jones helps us with the Bat.

Also means, Jordan PE's in Dodgers colors
pimp.gif
 
Dodgers come to ATL early next year (April 18-20)

I'll have to be there...
 
Congrats Dodger fans on signing Andruw Jones i can't wait to see some sick Jordan PE's in blue. I hope Andruw plays great for you guys and next yeari'll catch Andruw at Shea when the Dodgers come to town supporting Andruw.
 
Looks like Bonds is going to Oakland


[h1]Green and Bold: A's prepared to bring in Barry[/h1] [h2]MLB exec: 'No doubt . . . Oakland will sign Bonds'[/h2]
Susan Slusser, Chronicle Staff Writer

Thursday, December 6, 2007

(12-06) 19:28 PST Nashville --

- If they had decided to rebuild, the A's wouldn't have a spot for Barry Bonds.

However, the club is intact as the winter meetings end, and Oakland is considered the hot pick to sign the free-agent outfielder despite his legal troubles and the potential public-relations issues that accompany him.

"There is no doubt in my mind that Oakland will sign Bonds," one major-league executive said Thursday as the winter meetings wound down. "I'd be shocked if it didn't happen."

Two other teams also have expressed interest in Bonds, an industry source said. Bonds is most likely a fit for an American League club, so that he could serve as a designated hitter. The A's, though, apparently have told Bonds that if he signs with them, he would appear in left field with some frequency. The home run king would be splitting DH duties with Jack Cust.

"I'm speaking with American League clubs as well as National League clubs," Bonds' agent, Jeff Borris, said Thursday.

According to several people with knowledge of the talks, the A's were working on a deal to sign Bonds last month before he was indicted on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. Bonds will be arraigned on those charges in San Francisco today, but there is a belief in baseball and legal circles that a trial would not be held until after the 2008 season, or even early 2009.

The possible legal complications wouldn't be too difficult to handle contractually, according to several agents and executives: Any time off needed to take care of court proceedings would be factored into the deal, and the it would be null and void in the event of a conviction during the life of the contract.

The one sticking point for any team pursing Bonds might be convincing ownership to take on a player under a sizable cloud of steroid suspicion, but A's general manager Billy Beane usually has a free hand when it comes to personnel decisions and he has long been a fan of the longtime Giant. Beane consistently has declined to comment about Bonds, citing his longstanding policy of not discussing free agents.

Asked about Bonds two and a half weeks ago, A's owner Lew Wolff told The Chronicle, "I doubt we'd have interest now," but he did not dismiss the idea outright.

Bonds fits the A's criteria in many ways. First, he'll be relatively cheap, given all the off-the-field issues around him, plus he's 43 and his playing time occasionally is limited by injuries. Second, Oakland almost annually brings in a prominent player on the downside of a good career: Mike Piazza, Frank Thomas, David Justice, Ron Gant, Eric Karros, et al. And as one insider said Thursday, "Bonds is the ultimate. Frank Thomas is a great player, but even he can't hold a candle to Bonds."

Beane also likes to make a splash. He didn't do so at the winter meetings, despite heavy speculation that he would trade Dan Haren and/or Joe Blanton. And though the GM still could decide to move one of those starters, if he does not, signing Bonds would dwarf most other offseason baseball news. A one-year deal, or perhaps one year with a team option, would be the most likely agreement.

From Bonds' standpoint, the A's would be a terrific option because he'd remain in the Bay Area, which is where he is from and where he still has a loyal fan base. In addition, there's thought that Bonds wouldn't mind sending a message to his former employers in San Francisco, with a big season across the bridge. The A's are seldom opposed to ruffling the Giants' feathers, either.

Bonds has remained popular with his major-league peers throughout all his troubles. A's third baseman Eric Chavez said recently that he'd welcome Bonds as a teammate, and another Oakland player, asked this week about the possibility of adding Bonds, said, "That would be awesome. I would love that."

"Barry is not retiring," Borris repeated Thursday. "He was a major-league All-Star last year. He's still playing at an elite level. He loves playing baseball. He has every intention of keeping on with his career."
 
moz-screenshot.jpg
moz-screenshot-1.jpg
media


smokin.gif


I'd be good if they bring in Dontrelle but Pudge? Pudge is on a steep decline right now..


That's the thing though, Pudge isn't all that great, but the Tigers would part with Dontrelle if someone is a taker for a bad contract such asPudge's (I believe its 13mil for the next 3 years, dude had a .300 OBP last season, yuck). Thats a GREAT way for a team with money (like the Mets) to adddepth to the starting rotation WITHOUT giving away many prospects. They have contracts like Alou, delgado, etc all coming off the books next year, and if theyare not willing to trade prospects, they should take a bad contract because they can afford it.
 
18mil/per?

This deal makes Beltran look like a steal.
laugh.gif


You do know that the Mets will be paying Beltran $18.5 million starting next season and through 2011.

Another player who was great somewhere else comes to the Dodgers
roll.gif
. I guarantee you guys Andruw will be a shell of his former self in Los Angeles, it's the Dodgers tradition.
Damn you
mad.gif
. But ya'll got your own problems. Anyway, Iam hoping he is like the last Dodger FA that was here for less than three seasons and became a legend. Hint: He was an MVP.


(see avatar, called it a month in advance
laugh.gif
)
Only a month
wink.gif
.


Almost as good as my Giants starting OF of Roberts, Rajai, and Winn.
I know you are being sarcastic, but since you are a Giant fan,
laugh.gif
. Good luck with the Barry Bonds hangover.


My dude rapin em for 18 a year...
laugh.gif
his glove got him 15
After Hunter got that deal at Del Taco, we weren't signing him for less. Oh well, 2 years at $36 sounds a hell of a lot better than 5 yearsat $90 million.

@ Being more excited about Elijah Dukes than Andruw Jones...

Does Jones signing in LA make Andre Ethier or Kemp expendable? Or will they eat some of Pierre's deal to try and get him outta town?


Must be QRich (?)
laugh.gif


I don't care where Elijah Dukes plays, he will never be focused.

As far as who is expendable, it is hard to say. The Dodgers really don't want to move Kemp. It would take a trade for a frontline starter/Ace for theDodgers to even consider trading Matt Kemp.


Good signing by my Dodgers....
Yes sir!
smokin.gif


18 mil per year for andruw is pure madness
It's the market, thank you Anaheim Angels of Anaheim.
 
Also means, Jordan PE's in Dodgers colors
Best believe I am going to try to get my hand on a pair. I would always tell Betemit to give me Andruw's III's that he had stashed in hislocker. Then he got traded,
embarassed.gif
.
 
Reyes is THAT DUDE...He is the heart and soul of the Mets. More so then Wright and Beltran.

I mean even if those contracts come off the books. Imagine Pudge being our backstop and killing our drives and rallies more so than Lo Duca did last year.
 
Best believe I am going to try to get my hand on a pair. I would always tell Betemit to give me Andruw's III's that he had stashed in his locker. Then he got traded
Looking forward to seeing pics of them, Goodluck!!
 
Originally Posted by dmartinez0916

Looks like Bonds is going to Oakland


[h1]Green and Bold: A's prepared to bring in Barry[/h1] [h2]MLB exec: 'No doubt . . . Oakland will sign Bonds'[/h2]
Susan Slusser, Chronicle Staff Writer

Thursday, December 6, 2007

(12-06) 19:28 PST Nashville --

- If they had decided to rebuild, the A's wouldn't have a spot for Barry Bonds.

However, the club is intact as the winter meetings end, and Oakland is considered the hot pick to sign the free-agent outfielder despite his legal troubles and the potential public-relations issues that accompany him.

"There is no doubt in my mind that Oakland will sign Bonds," one major-league executive said Thursday as the winter meetings wound down. "I'd be shocked if it didn't happen."

Two other teams also have expressed interest in Bonds, an industry source said. Bonds is most likely a fit for an American League club, so that he could serve as a designated hitter. The A's, though, apparently have told Bonds that if he signs with them, he would appear in left field with some frequency. The home run king would be splitting DH duties with Jack Cust.

"I'm speaking with American League clubs as well as National League clubs," Bonds' agent, Jeff Borris, said Thursday.

According to several people with knowledge of the talks, the A's were working on a deal to sign Bonds last month before he was indicted on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. Bonds will be arraigned on those charges in San Francisco today, but there is a belief in baseball and legal circles that a trial would not be held until after the 2008 season, or even early 2009.

The possible legal complications wouldn't be too difficult to handle contractually, according to several agents and executives: Any time off needed to take care of court proceedings would be factored into the deal, and the it would be null and void in the event of a conviction during the life of the contract.

The one sticking point for any team pursing Bonds might be convincing ownership to take on a player under a sizable cloud of steroid suspicion, but A's general manager Billy Beane usually has a free hand when it comes to personnel decisions and he has long been a fan of the longtime Giant. Beane consistently has declined to comment about Bonds, citing his longstanding policy of not discussing free agents.

Asked about Bonds two and a half weeks ago, A's owner Lew Wolff told The Chronicle, "I doubt we'd have interest now," but he did not dismiss the idea outright.

Bonds fits the A's criteria in many ways. First, he'll be relatively cheap, given all the off-the-field issues around him, plus he's 43 and his playing time occasionally is limited by injuries. Second, Oakland almost annually brings in a prominent player on the downside of a good career: Mike Piazza, Frank Thomas, David Justice, Ron Gant, Eric Karros, et al. And as one insider said Thursday, "Bonds is the ultimate. Frank Thomas is a great player, but even he can't hold a candle to Bonds."

Beane also likes to make a splash. He didn't do so at the winter meetings, despite heavy speculation that he would trade Dan Haren and/or Joe Blanton. And though the GM still could decide to move one of those starters, if he does not, signing Bonds would dwarf most other offseason baseball news. A one-year deal, or perhaps one year with a team option, would be the most likely agreement.

From Bonds' standpoint, the A's would be a terrific option because he'd remain in the Bay Area, which is where he is from and where he still has a loyal fan base. In addition, there's thought that Bonds wouldn't mind sending a message to his former employers in San Francisco, with a big season across the bridge. The A's are seldom opposed to ruffling the Giants' feathers, either.

Bonds has remained popular with his major-league peers throughout all his troubles. A's third baseman Eric Chavez said recently that he'd welcome Bonds as a teammate, and another Oakland player, asked this week about the possibility of adding Bonds, said, "That would be awesome. I would love that."

"Barry is not retiring," Borris repeated Thursday. "He was a major-league All-Star last year. He's still playing at an elite level. He loves playing baseball. He has every intention of keeping on with his career."


It would be cool if Barry stayed in the Bay
pimp.gif
 
You do know that the Mets will be paying Beltran $18.5 million starting next season and through 2011.


Exactly why I said it makes Beltran look like a steal. He's gonna make as much as Beltran.
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by ooIRON MANoo

18mil/per?

This deal makes Beltran look like a steal.
laugh.gif


You do know that the Mets will be paying Beltran $18.5 million starting next season and through 2011.

Another player who was great somewhere else comes to the Dodgers
roll.gif
. I guarantee you guys Andruw will be a shell of his former self in Los Angeles, it's the Dodgers tradition.
Damn you
mad.gif
. But ya'll got your own problems. Anyway, I am hoping he is like the last Dodger FA that was here for less than three seasons and became a legend. Hint: He was an MVP.


(see avatar, called it a month in advance
laugh.gif
)
Only a month
wink.gif
.


Almost as good as my Giants starting OF of Roberts, Rajai, and Winn.
I know you are being sarcastic, but since you are a Giant fan,
laugh.gif
. Good luck with the Barry Bonds hangover.


My dude rapin em for 18 a year...
laugh.gif
his glove got him 15
After Hunter got that deal at Del Taco, we weren't signing him for less. Oh well, 2 years at $36 sounds a hell of a lot better than 5 years at $90 million.

@ Being more excited about Elijah Dukes than Andruw Jones...

Does Jones signing in LA make Andre Ethier or Kemp expendable? Or will they eat some of Pierre's deal to try and get him outta town?


Must be QRich (?)
laugh.gif


I don't care where Elijah Dukes plays, he will never be focused.

As far as who is expendable, it is hard to say. The Dodgers really don't want to move Kemp. It would take a trade for a frontline starter/Ace for the Dodgers to even consider trading Matt Kemp.


Good signing by my Dodgers....
Yes sir!
smokin.gif


18 mil per year for andruw is pure madness
It's the market, thank you Anaheim Angels of Anaheim.




laugh.gif
at blaming the angels. i guess texas giving arod all that money doesnt mean anything. at least we win tho. have fun missing the playoffs and payingjones all that money while he bats .220
laugh.gif
 
(I believe its 13mil for the next 3 years, dude had a .300 OBP last season, yuck).
The Tigers picked up the club option on Pudge's contract. He will be a FA after this season. The Mets will still have to give up Schneider +Prospect/s.



Exactly why I said it makes Beltran look like a steal. He's gonna make as much as Beltran.
laugh.gif
@ you thinking Beltran is that much better. Mets fans,never cease to amaze me. Beltran is solid, but he isn't better than Jones. I wouldn't put one above the other, they are both good.
 
Back
Top Bottom