- Oct 8, 2005
- 13,424
- 4,833
Probably ragreting all those renderings now
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dope, why 04? We got KILLED! Guess the "BIG 4" stuff.NBATV playin a ton of Laker games from 01, 02, 04, 09 the next couple days.
Dope, why 04? We got KILLED! Guess the "BIG 4" stuff.NBATV playin a ton of Laker games from 01, 02, 04, 09 the next couple days.
Oh yeah, duh lol.
They don't look any worse than anyone else that's super tatted
I roam around here, never post, just a question based off a rumor.Why does Clarkson for Okafor make sense?
Ingrams tats look technikally sound individually, but they dont flow. His artist had, still has, an opportunity to blend them n make em pop more. Right now, in my opinion, they resemble temporary tats, in a sense they are just placed in a position. Theres no kontinuity where they transition n fit together. If they were smoked n resembled a kollage, i think the desired effekt would be signifikantly more pronounced.
Just my thoughts [emoji]128129[/emoji]
What you did there...Only if the deal inkludes 3 of ingrams tats, one of chicks old mics, n free tacos from like 6 games