- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,431
- 40,988
the team as a whole was impressive in the 4th, but curry too wet though...pause
**LA LAKERS THREAD** Sitting on 17! 2023-2024 offseason begins
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
- Mar 28, 2009
- 18,488
- 6,333
Yeah I'll say we did hella good against the ****** that's gon win it all 
- Jan 3, 2011
- 18,793
- 10,192
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
Last edited:
- Nov 1, 2011
- 2,433
- 1,128
I agree that Ingram and Deng should be starting together. I could see that happening after all-star break.
I don't agree with us having the worst defense in the league.
- Sep 5, 2010
- 11,513
- 5,897
deng and ingram could potentially be lethal.
- Mar 24, 2001
- 44,833
- 66,536
If JC is benched for Ingram, I have no qualms with that. If it's for Lou Williams.. 
But yea our version of a death lineup is going to be defensively with Russ/Ingram/Deng/Nance/moz and eventually Zu. Too much length
But yea our version of a death lineup is going to be defensively with Russ/Ingram/Deng/Nance/moz and eventually Zu. Too much length
- Sep 5, 2010
- 93,219
- 129,829
View media item 2204831
0-82.
0-82.
- Nov 8, 2013
- 733
- 460
Nick looking decent out there. Hope we can flip him for some more pieces around the trade deadline.
- Sep 5, 2010
- 11,513
- 5,897
I wonder what the ceiling is for Randle. 
So hard to predict.
If he can be an LO replacement that would be cool, doesnt look like he'll be what we think he'll be.
So hard to predict.
If he can be an LO replacement that would be cool, doesnt look like he'll be what we think he'll be.
- Nov 1, 2011
- 2,433
- 1,128
Any "death" lineup isn't going to include Moz. More like Russ, JC (Nick if he keeps this up), Ingram, Deng, then Randle or Nance at the 5.If JC is benched for Ingram, I have no qualms with that. If it's for Lou Williams..
But yea our version of a death lineup is going to be defensively with Russ/Ingram/Deng/Nance/moz and eventually Zu. Too much length
Rather move Lou Will.
- Jan 3, 2011
- 18,793
- 10,192
I wonder what the ceiling is for Randle.
So hard to predict.
If he can be an LO replacement that would be cool, doesnt look like he'll be what we think he'll be.
That seriously is a bad comparison and insult to Odom.
Odom's prime and best years with the Lakers >>> Randle's potential.
- Sep 5, 2010
- 11,513
- 5,897
Exactly my point. If he's not gonna be at LO's level at least... Why is he even here still.
Stretch 4 that can't do much.
Stretch 4 that can't do much.
- Nov 1, 2011
- 2,433
- 1,128
What do you expect to get for him? I don't think he has much value around the league, might as well give him more time to develop/get his trade value up.
If JC is benched for Ingram, I have no qualms with that. If it's for Lou Williams..
But yea our version of a death lineup is going to be defensively with Russ/Ingram/Deng/Nance/moz and eventually Zu. Too much length
As they learn/grow/develop, Luke gonna have a lot of fun mixing and matching. Give him enough rope, Luke gonna have them cookin in no time.
Last edited:
- Sep 5, 2010
- 11,513
- 5,897
Is he a good defender? Can he shoot? He's not really solid for a high pick.
- Nov 1, 2011
- 2,433
- 1,128
Right, I agree with you on all of that. But what are you trading him for? You're not going to get much for him.
- Sep 5, 2010
- 11,513
- 5,897
I agree that there is nothing to be done right now.
I just can't get why some guys like him.
I was all for Randle when he was drafted (what else can you do at that point)
But we've gotten to this point, trade him whenever possible.
I just can't get why some guys like him.
I was all for Randle when he was drafted (what else can you do at that point)
But we've gotten to this point, trade him whenever possible.
- Jan 4, 2012
- 11,417
- 12,665
There should be a template trade post in this thread.
Haven't even played a single game yet... chill the hell out
Haven't even played a single game yet... chill the hell out
Last edited:
- Sep 5, 2010
- 11,513
- 5,897
LOL. i just don't see it.
I guess we'll soon find out (even though we already know)
I guess we'll soon find out (even though we already know)
- Mar 24, 2001
- 44,833
- 66,536
I meant defensively bro
. Randle/Nance aren't great rim protectors at the 5. Offensively they would be trouble thoAs they learn/grow/develop, Luke gonna have a lot of fun mixing and matching. Give him enough rope, Luke gonna have them cookin in no time.
I got all my faith in Luke
- Sep 5, 2010
- 93,219
- 129,829
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
Is it me, or have you been in the Laker threads for more than ONE season?????
You know how it works here, hypothetical trade talks 365 days a year with the Laker gang
- Sep 5, 2010
- 93,219
- 129,829
It's nothing more than taking a survey of the landscape of the team and simple projections moving forward.
