the lakers are in a conundrum. they don't have thel uxury of patience because lebron perhaps has a 2-3 year window before we see a steep drop in both athleticism and production. are you willing to throw this rare opportunity just so the lakers can coddle 2 prospects?
I'm sure Ingram was part of it but Tatum was not expected to be this type of scorer. Most thought he would be an inefficient pound the ball and shoot midrangers type of guy (which he kinda is, just really really good at it). The big surprise is him shooting 3s so well, I really didn't see that happening.
Aight, so you have no real answer, just throwing something at the wall.
see, this is the problem. the source that you're citing are part of the culprit why lonzo was so highly regarded- he ended up 2nd overall despite of the tremendous flaws
see, this is the problem. the source that you're citing are part of the culprit why lonzo was so highly regarded- he ended up 2nd overall despite of the tremendous flaws
. Bro, go home.
It's not simple cuz you can't give a real answer.
- but there are plenty of simple knockdown shooters who’d make the Lakers better overall, especially when LeBron and Rondo have the ball...
This!!
I gave you a real answer, trade Lonzo for shooters. He doesn’t fit, he’s never going to be a great shooter, and the most worrying thing is he’s absolutely terrible around the rim. His finishing is pathetic....
But the pro’s about Lonzo is that he’s ridiculously young and has potential to get better. That alone is an asset that many teams would trade for... so trade him.
Outside of that, I can’t give you the players who I’d trade for Lonzo, I’m not Rob Palinka
Aight man.
that's not what I was suggesting. i said these outlets are part of the problem and why lavar was able to throw his sales pitch which in turn bamboozled magic and the laker fans.Yes, so every major basketball outlet was wrong but these unknown, uncited sources are right, got it.
thinking lebron cares about kcp
