- Feb 3, 2012
- 7,264
- 14,980
Since I see we got DMV people in here, who is getting these?? I only remember one kid at my school having 17s and he had the white/blue mids. ****head brought the suitcase to school too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. Definitely not glamorous at all. LOL. It was just a convenient area mall lolPurely coincidence. Iverson Mall also isn’t the nicest mall to frequent in the DMV. Gotta keep your head on a swivel over there.
I am. I ordered mines off eBay. I know I won’t find these anywhere in the area. Maybe DC, but I don’t want to go through the hassleSince I see we got DMV people in here, who is getting these?? I only remember one kid at my school having 17s and he had the white/blue mids. ****head brought the suitcase to school too.
On the Detroit News
Im from kzoo but two hours away from the D but about 6am maybe earlierI’m assuming you from Detroit too lol. How early you think the line gon start
Where can we read about why he said production costs got more expensive? Interested to know why.They can’t sell them that cheap. The $200 17’s in 2002 are $354 in real dollars. The lows at $150 are $265 in real dollars. As @MJO23DAN pointed out, production costs on the later models got VERY expensive.
Because the way the 17 is constructed is a lot different from modern shoes, uses a variety of premium/expensive materials, and has 6 upper panels compared to 1-3 on most shoes today. The outsole is decoupled, not one piece, there's the spring plate, the eyelets, an inner neoprene boot with extra stitching to make it fold down, zoom units in the fore foot, an air sole PU-encapsulated visible in the heel, a different foam used in the midsole. It takes more labor to produce it, there's more room for human error, and almost no modern shoe has this many upper panels, let alone various mid and outsole materials that have to be fused together.Where can we read about why he said production costs got more expensive? Interested to know why.
On the Detroit News
Soon as word got out these will be limited now nobody has a problem paying the “outrageous” price tag. Says more about the consumer.Looking back in the early days of this thread, boy were we wrong. Went from no hype- will cop on discount, to one of the most limited releases of the year & making the news.
I might know a couple depending on what size you are.Any places in Texas getting these?
So basically, another smokescreen for a price increase. As we have seen with Jordan Retro's, starting with something like the air bag for instance, the zoom units in the forefoot are going to be regular air bags. Just like several other Jordan Retro's that had zoom or like the 15's that had nothing in the forefoot. But the description claimed they did. Be interested to see if they have the spring plate or just a plastic piece in place, and what kind of foam is in the midsole. Jordan Brand really needs to stop the nonsense.Because the way the 17 is constructed is a lot different from modern shoes, uses a variety of premium/expensive materials, and has 6 upper panels compared to 1-3 on most shoes today. The outsole is decoupled, not one piece, there's the spring plate, the eyelets, an inner neoprene boot with extra stitching to make it fold down, zoom units in the fore foot, an air sole PU-encapsulated visible in the heel, a different foam used in the midsole. It takes more labor to produce it, there's more room for human error, and almost no modern shoe has this many upper panels, let alone various mid and outsole materials that have to be fused together.
tl;dr: there's many layers to the production process on the 17 and some of the other later models.