- Feb 4, 2015
- 5,382
- 12,878
How did I strike out on these?
Most of us would've too if you didn't camp or get lucky[emoji]128517[/emoji]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How did I strike out on these?
Make legit check post so members can advise you.Does anyone know if windy city sole sells fakes or are they legit? I bought the 2017 royal 1's and the lace bag looks different from my pair I got from Nike!!
The 2017s don't have the size and style code on the collar right?
I wonder what their reasoning was putting it on the Black/Reds but not Royals?
This rumor of satins coming out in NYC probably got resellers scramblingNo satins in NYC I spoke to frank cooker this morning [emoji]128548[/emoji]
it was cause the blk/red were banned
Ah gotcha. I knew the story and I guess I didn't take a close look even though I own them. I thought it was the size and product number.I just found this out the other day, but the number inside the banned is actually the date the 'banned' thing occured
Here is a letter written by then NBA Executive Vice President, Russ Granik, addressed to Nike Vice President, Rob Strasser. It states that Michael Jordan wore a certain pair of Nike basketball shoes that violated the league's rules and procedures on or around October 18, 1984.
I bet they mold easy if you live in a humid place.Satins suck
If they weren't limited they would be rotting next to the ajko
Nike is genius for making people believe that.it was cause the blk/red were banned
samegot through.. said no results
should've put in quotes, but yea, nike is good at what they doNike is genius for making people believe that.
I got in trouble for questioning Nikes fable when I briefly worked at a Nike store.I'm not surprised that people still think the black/red Jordan 1's were the original banned sneakers. They're not.
Correct.Air ships right?