- 13,330
- 11,573
^^^
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@AirThompson
Did you think they fit any differently than previous IV's? Do they run smaller/bigger/same?
^^^ it is a money thing, but when you cut back on material to save money it causes the quality of the shoe to go down the tubes.
that's not completely true. Yes, if you cut back on material it can cause the quality to dip but that doesn't seem to be the case based what @AirThompson
said.
Sounds like JB has given us better materials, but still cut back on the mold to save money. In this case we are getting less material but an increase in quality. The two do not have to go hand in hand every time.
Right, and the higher price tag is based on the use of more materials. Even with this $15 increase for the 4's, you gotta understand 7.50 of that is retail so Nike is making the other 7.50. A couple bucks of that is the better material. So Nike is pulling in an extra $5 a shoe - less when you account for office admin, salaries etc..I said the quality was nice. But I do agree with @stevesteve72 on this one. The mold isnt a money thing imo however. I think they can easily recreate it, but just choose not to. But when they decide to it allows them to charge an arm and a leg. Just look at the Nike Air resurgence. The return of the old, brings a higher demand, followed by higher pricetag.
This brings me back to fakes. Back in the golden era of fakes, when we saw Sponge Bob, and Louis Vuitton prints. I remember the fake 4s had the same mold as the '99 retro. So theres no way I'm believing JB cant do it when fake factories were doing it pushing em out for $80.
When we talk inflation, its not just the cost of the materials or factory labour that we have to think about. You need to think how much it cost Nike to run an add on TV, newspaper, sponsorships (tell me who ever made a $300M deal like KD back in the day), salaries for their US employees, benefits, benefits etc etc.
I'm hearing a lot of talk about the cost factor
But if you look back at the older price of jordans with the good quality it was reasonable a good 25 to 35% cheaper than the newer not so well put together models we have today.
For the price they were selling they still turned a profit over the years
I'm just speculating that they just want more profit
Not sure if the cost of materials have gone up [JB most likely has a very good deal set up where they're getting the materials in bulk for dirt cheap]
For the better materials factor how much better are we talking? And from what aspect ?
Oh yeah forgot about inflation
When we talk inflation, its not just the cost of the materials or factory labour that we have to think about. You need to think how much it cost Nike to run an add on TV, newspaper, sponsorships (tell me who ever made a $300M deal like KD back in the day), salaries for their US employees, benefits, benefits etc etc.
If you want to compare the cost back then, then you need to take inflation into account. And if we compared the cost of the OG's and properly adjusted for inflation in today's dollars, then the Jordan Brand is actually cheaper now than it was then.
not all releases/colorways use the same type of leather/materials so i wouldn't base all of the future "remastered" releases off of that. Also people are either extremely pleased with the frag quality or extremely let down
so with the release of the remastered jordan 1 fragments, it is clear that the change is mainly in the price only. their quality is quite similar to royals and below LMs...the only notable change was the price increase from 130euros to 170..lol
Buy what you like, don't worry what the next man has on his feet.
I was really looking forward to the columbias but as of now i feel like everyone in my city is going to be rocking them, I might just save up and get the cement 3s from last year instead.
Women rock sneakers too
Buy what you like, don't worry what the next man has on his feet.
Yup you're right they do
Women rock sneakers too
I remember that very sharply. I remember when I noticed that and was SOOO pissed. Especially due to the fact that they released the powder blue 9's first that year then the other 9s.The "lost the mold" thing is ducktales imo...JB just lessen the materials and made the retros less bulky...The '10 Powder Blue 9's had the bulky 9 mold of past but when you get to the Citrus 9's that came out like 2 months after and beyond is where you get the less bulky more curvy mold of that retro. It boggles my mind of how arrogant JB is to do that yet charge more lol
I remember that very sharply. I remember when I noticed that and was SOOO pissed. Especially due to the fact that they released the powder blue 9's first that year then the other 9s.
I also get mad every time I see them make the History of Flight All White, Pantone, Georgetown, and other 1-XX3 Niketown Collections with perfect retro molds every year.
Exactly...trolls beyond trolling lolI remember that very sharply. I remember when I noticed that and was SOOO pissed. Especially due to the fact that they released the powder blue 9's first that year then the other 9s.
I also get mad every time I see them make the History of Flight All White, Pantone, Georgetown, and other 1-XX3 Niketown Collections with perfect retro molds every year.
Feb 14AJ1 Low Bred still scheduled in February?
The reason they were "thrown out/banned" was because they did not have white in them, regulations back then were strict regarding shoes so they had to follow the color way of the teams.I don't understand. chicago's color scheme was the same as those 1's. Why were they banned?