- 88,756
- 47,964
Are we really getting remastered chicago 1's?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i dont know if they mentioned anything about changing the shape and whatnot. as of now all we know is they're using better quality materials, thats allLet's see what rrally happens in 2015.
Me and most other jordan collectors think they will only improve some details but not bring back original shape etc.
I doubt the 9 retros would have 6 plastic lace loop rows etc.
Are we really getting remastered chicago 1's?
i dont know if they mentioned anything about changing the shape and whatnot. as of now all we know is they're using better quality materials, thats all
did not know that, ive seen the pics but haven't paid attention to the molds closely. looked the same to me. and what 1s are u talking about? haven't seen any of thoseYessir. May if I remember correctly.
They've specifically mentioned creating new molds, and if you have an eye for detail you can see that the mold of all the upcoming VIIs and I's are a bit closer to where they're supposed to be than the current ones.
did not know that, ive seen the pics but haven't paid attention to the molds closely. looked the same to me. and what 1s are u talking about? haven't seen any of those
bad bad bad so bad bad bad
flu game 12 and bred 1 will be the best if done right. something about that leather and the way its shaped on the 12's is crazyi'm waiting for some remastered 12's, cmon JB let me see what u can do with em!
go get XX8 SE on sale...
I wanna buy those XX9's, but they're 225. My limit's 150 or 160.
But yeah, I should get modern shoes that's perfect for my budget
I was going to, but I backed out, after hearing reports of the bag popping.go get XX8 SE on sale...
Not possible on Re-Mastering A Awready Mastered Shoe of the Jordan sig line. Titanium XX3's are in a league of they're own when it comes too Prestige J's Bro.Remaster Titanium XX3'S!
I agree 100%. I'm all about the mold and shape along with materials. But Got Daaaam Them Smooth Buttery High Grain Durabuck Leather on them Bords.I dont know if this has been said but i think a remastered sneaker is a matter of opinion. To me a remaster isnt just about the materials. Those are important but to me more importantly is the shape of the actual shoe and i dont know if this has been talked about yet but i dont get why that doesnt get talked about enough. The shapes of the OGs are higher cut whereas the shapes of Jordans from 2000 and beyond are all mid shapes. This might not be a big deal but i feel like when they say "REMASTERED" this doesnt get talked about. I want higher cut jordans.
These all have higher cuts and sharper slopes. Compare these pics to all the newer versions dropping the past 5 years (thats why i picked these colors) theres a vast difference in slopes and cuts. True the OGs have better materials (perhaps sharper colors i.e. bordeaux 7s or the actual Nike Air) and they were the first run of them but i dont understand given how they dropped the command force this year and it was damn near identical to the 1990 version.
Again i dont know if this has been talked about but i know for sure Nike / JB checks these forums (they troll us plenty of times / team roshe gets all sorts of love) so i believe we need to start up the dialogue about it when we are talking about true "REMASTERS"
I dont know if this has been said but i think a remastered sneaker is a matter of opinion. To me a remaster isnt just about the materials. Those are important but to me more importantly is the shape of the actual shoe and i dont know if this has been talked about yet but i dont get why that doesnt get talked about enough. The shapes of the OGs are higher cut whereas the shapes of Jordans from 2000 and beyond are all mid shapes. This might not be a big deal but i feel like when they say "REMASTERED" this doesnt get talked about. I want higher cut jordans.
It is something talked about in this thread, and is something that JB told us they are working on as part of their Remastering program. Whether we see molds true to OG form remains to be seen I guess. But there are lots of folks you agree with you on this in here.I dont know if this has been said but i think a remastered sneaker is a matter of opinion. To me a remaster isnt just about the materials. Those are important but to me more importantly is the shape of the actual shoe and i dont know if this has been talked about yet but i dont get why that doesnt get talked about enough. The shapes of the OGs are higher cut whereas the shapes of Jordans from 2000 and beyond are all mid shapes. This might not be a big deal but i feel like when they say "REMASTERED" this doesnt get talked about. I want higher cut jordans.
These all have higher cuts and sharper slopes. Compare these pics to all the newer versions dropping the past 5 years (thats why i picked these colors) theres a vast difference in slopes and cuts. True the OGs have better materials (perhaps sharper colors i.e. bordeaux 7s or the actual Nike Air) and they were the first run of them but i dont understand given how they dropped the command force this year and it was damn near identical to the 1990 version.
Again i dont know if this has been talked about but i know for sure Nike / JB checks these forums (they troll us plenty of times / team roshe gets all sorts of love) so i believe we need to start up the dialogue about it when we are talking about true "REMASTERS"
gonna be honest, i would never like to see JB go back to the OG molds with the 3 and the 4.
i love how people forget that the tongues were disgusting on both, especially the 3. also not a fan of that very thin elephant print.
higher cut on the 4's also looks weird.
if we get 1999 4 shapes and 2001 3's then i'll be good
you do know that '99 4's also have a higher cut?if we get 1999 4 shapes and 2001 3's then i'll be good