You might have had a point if this all started when Hamas took power. The democratically elected government of Israel has been doing this for 80 years now matter who's leading Palestine. So why should she or anyone else believe it would be different this time?
Can you really argue that Palestinian leaders of the past (namely, Arafat and the PLO) haven't led their people on because "a better deal will be around the corner"? I mean, for all the praise that Oslo is getting today, let's remember that Arafat had few Arab leaders by his side after supporting the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq, being active in the Lebanon civil war, and trying to destabilize the Jordanian monarchy.
Can we recognize the role the PLO's past is playing in the inability of Palestinian authorities to be effectively supported by Arab nations?
Can we recognize that Hamas has been committing war crimes (indiscriminate targeting of civilian centers)? The same ones Israel has been committing?
Can we recognize that given the unpopularity of Bibi and his coalition, attacking left-leaning Israelis was not a move to be praised if the overall outcome of the resistance is peace and a free Palestine? Can we agree that when your enemy is divided, the worst thing you can do is give them a reason to unite against you?
Can we recognize the problematic slogan that is "from the [Jordan] river to the [Mediterranean] sea, Palestine will be free?" Anyone care to pick up a map and figure out what that's supposed to mean?
I stand by what I said. Given that the playbook for successful resistance has been written in many places throughout the last century, and given what we know about the inability of the international community to enforce international law, it's insane to think that Hamas' current strategy will bear fruit for the Palestinian people.