Are some of ya'll SERIOUSLY getting on
DLF
because of using X/Twitter since now Elon is in Trump's cabinet and comparing that to him criticizing the Dems and choosing not to vote for them?
What kind of moral absolutism and comparison is this?
You’re welcome to quote and address me directly if you’d like.
Unless you’re referring to someone else, I believe you’re missing my point.
Remember when you were urging people to stop shaming voters? It wasn’t that long ago:
In regards to voting, ya'll can vote for who you want and I do not know why there is this shaming voters which party to vote for as we do not live in a liberatory or fully and authentic democratic system
Despite looking up to you, DLF has decided to ignore this, as he’s done nothing but spit on those who - like him - have been forced to choose from imperfect options.
He implies that those who tried to block Trump are “hypocrites” without taking stock of his own choices.
That’s the point. In defending Twitter, he’s made the same “both sides” “lesser of two evils” arguments he’s used to try and pretend that helping to elect Donald Trump was somehow the only ethical choice.
Talk about moral absolutism.
DLF is hardly alone in being largely unaware of this conflict prior to 10/7/23. Tens of millions of people found themselves shocked and horrified by what happened that day, and ever since. So not only are they justly outraged by the mass murder of an extremely vulnerable and deliberately entrapped civilian population, but they are also catching up on decades of oppression. They want to learn more, they want to do more, but they’re also embarrassed about their prior obliviousness/ignorance - and so many of them look to social media for cues to try and get up to speed, fit in, and find community/purpose at a time when it would be all to easily to feel exasperatingly powerless.
And while social media has helped lift the fog in some instances, providing direct, on the ground information and citizen journalism akin to what helped disprove some official accounts and media narratives about police brutality incidents and protests in the United States, it has also provided grifters with the opportunity to exploit catastrophe for their own selfish ends. (Many of them White Nationalists and Russian shills.)
While he was trying to get up to speed, DLF was cautioned about people like Jackson Hinkle, but he would hear none of it. He wanted on the ground reporting and didn’t want to hear anything about the backgrounds of those who curated it for him. In recent months, he seems to have managed to identify a few grifters and misinformation spreaders, and is probably embarrassed to have promoted some of them, as he is embarrassed to have relied on CNN for most of last year.
I suspect that, in the future, he’ll come to feel similarly about some of his recent sophomoric behavior.
In its pursuit of engagement, algorithmic social media rewards outrage farming. (Twitter rewards it financially, through “revenue sharing.”) Sometimes people - especially those who are overcompensating to distract their wannabe peers from the fact that they’re privileged neophytes - mistake positions that generate the most outrage for those that are the most “pure” or “hardcore.”
We’ve all seen what happens when people cloister themselves away in self-reinforcing echo chambers. They often become internally hierarchical preening competitions with no tolerance for introspection and no real praxis aside from endless posturing.
If you’ve ever had the misfortune of attempting to exist in an activist space alongside a coffee shop revolutionary in their smug Che Guevara t-shirt phase, who read Capital for an Econ class and made it their entire personality for two years before joining a private equity firm, then you understand the fatigue some of us are feeling with DLF’s recent antics.
If you don’t think “moral absolutism” and “purity politics” are helping anyone on the ground, then what is the value of spiking the football at a time when Trump and Netanyahu are hurtling towards a policy of annexation and claiming those who sacrificed in attempt to prevent the worst case scenario through electoral means were ackshyually supporting genocide?
For the record, does anyone here still think that Palestinian people deserve this - or only the people harassing our team from the outside after getting banned?
Who is helped by terminal “nothing matters” doomerism?
For what it’s worth, I don’t find “I told you so” posts to be particularly worthwhile, either. The focus should be on what we can do, not wallowing in nihilism.
I know this is not some distant abstraction for you, and I should hope you realize that many of those who chose to include, rather than abandon, political engagement are likewise motivated by a deep, personal connection. I expect that quite a few people who participate in this thread will experience - and have in some cases
already experienced - some form of harm as a result of this election. That ought to be respected.
Everyone here lives with a degree of relative privilege. We are not “in the trenches, covered in blood,” but none of us can claim to have spotless hands, either, when contemplating what our tax and consumer dollars have contributed towards, or the many bodies treated as fertilizer for economies in which we participate.
Each of us has to make the best decisions we can - and not all of us have access to the same options.
Don’t make perfect the enemy of good. Don’t make good the enemy of better.