- 10,249
- 6,648
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
In any era, you take the talent. You would take Draymond Green over Shaq? I’m using extreme examples to illustrate your point.
The good teams play at their pace. They can slow down the game to what they want. Pop knew Duncan was an excellent half court player on both sides, so they made all their opponents play in the half court. Duncan may not have been KG athletically, but he was certainly not a stiff.
Kobe is what he set out to be, a B-grade Jordan. Not knocking him, he’s an all-time great. But Duncan was a bigger winner than Kobe.
And speaking of their primes, which Kobe you taking? The second-banana three-peat young Kobe? How about the 35ppg barely-.500 Kobe? Gotta be the b2b Finals MVP version (despite Gasol having more win shares both seasons, and of course the aforementioned Celtics injuries undoubtedly allowing that success), right?
But Duncan, his prime was nearly his entire career. His per-36 were eerily similar throughout (sans the last two or so seasons). And considering he was winning the entire time, that’s even more impressive.
im still taking kobe. ill build around kobe rather than building around gasol in todays league. its that simple for me. im not knocking duncan. but. TRUTH BE TOLD, duncan was never THE guy in the league. and hell no... im taking shaq to bang on everyone. shaq in his prime would be a sight to see in this league. it woulda been glorious