- 9,737
- 205
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
I thought I was in the Warriors thread for a minute
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay
I love that we took over this thread. Where are all the haters?
Originally Posted by JumpmanFromDaBay
I love that we took over this thread. Where are all the haters?
First of all, @*%! semantics. Second, LOL at your backwards %!* logic.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
LOL @ The concept of carrying the Warriors. To carry means to actual travel somewhere right? How can a bum team be carried?Originally Posted by chrome vapors
That's exactly what I'm not saying. I'm not sure Monta could contribute as much to the Spurs night in and night out as Manu, and I don't think Manu could straight up carry the Warriors.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
What makes you think the Spurs would be as successful if Monta were in the spot that Manu was in?
First of all, @*%! semantics. Second, LOL at your backwards %!* logic.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
LOL @ The concept of carrying the Warriors. To carry means to actual travel somewhere right? How can a bum team be carried?Originally Posted by chrome vapors
That's exactly what I'm not saying. I'm not sure Monta could contribute as much to the Spurs night in and night out as Manu, and I don't think Manu could straight up carry the Warriors.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
What makes you think the Spurs would be as successful if Monta were in the spot that Manu was in?
Originally Posted by LazyJ10
I wouldn't resign Bwright because he's shown all of 22 season minutes of promise. Look at AR.
Originally Posted by LazyJ10
I wouldn't resign Bwright because he's shown all of 22 season minutes of promise. Look at AR.
Originally Posted by amel223
LOL @ The concept of carrying the Warriors. To carry means to actual travel somewhere right? How can a bum team be carried?
Originally Posted by amel223
LOL @ The concept of carrying the Warriors. To carry means to actual travel somewhere right? How can a bum team be carried?
Sorry but this is the mentality of a fan of a losing franchise. GSW is a LOSING franchise. Point blank. Get off of your horse. GSW is a LOSING franchise. So if a player "leads" his team to 5 wins you can consider that carrying a team to 5 wins? Last time I checked, carrying a team means TAKING THE TEAM SOMEWHERE. That is how the figurative meaning of it was created. If your team is a perennial LOSER how in the hell can you say anyone has carried them?Originally Posted by chrome vapors
It doesn't matter if your teams wins 5 games or 50. If your team's success is dependent on your contributions, you carry that team. The only difference is in one case, you carry the team to 5 wins and the other you carry your team to 50 wins.
And you really need to correct yourself, Cleveland is a bum team. Warriors aren't playoff caliber by any means right now but at 18-23 we're still respectable.
Sorry but this is the mentality of a fan of a losing franchise. GSW is a LOSING franchise. Point blank. Get off of your horse. GSW is a LOSING franchise. So if a player "leads" his team to 5 wins you can consider that carrying a team to 5 wins? Last time I checked, carrying a team means TAKING THE TEAM SOMEWHERE. That is how the figurative meaning of it was created. If your team is a perennial LOSER how in the hell can you say anyone has carried them?Originally Posted by chrome vapors
It doesn't matter if your teams wins 5 games or 50. If your team's success is dependent on your contributions, you carry that team. The only difference is in one case, you carry the team to 5 wins and the other you carry your team to 50 wins.
And you really need to correct yourself, Cleveland is a bum team. Warriors aren't playoff caliber by any means right now but at 18-23 we're still respectable.
Originally Posted by daprescription
Originally Posted by LazyJ10
I wouldn't resign Bwright because he's shown all of 22 season minutes of promise. Look at AR.
You don't think Wright's played good in the minutes he's had? You know it's not going to take much to re-sign him, why wouldn't you do it? Also, Randolph sucked. I have always had Wright over Randolph despite everyone's love for him. Everyone likes Udoh, but don't forget, Wright is still younger than him.
Originally Posted by daprescription
Originally Posted by LazyJ10
I wouldn't resign Bwright because he's shown all of 22 season minutes of promise. Look at AR.
You don't think Wright's played good in the minutes he's had? You know it's not going to take much to re-sign him, why wouldn't you do it? Also, Randolph sucked. I have always had Wright over Randolph despite everyone's love for him. Everyone likes Udoh, but don't forget, Wright is still younger than him.
FOH. Where is "somewhere" the playoffs? .500 record? Who made you the authority on figurative meanings? and you tell me to get off my horse.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Sorry but this is the mentality of a fan of a losing franchise. GSW is a LOSING franchise. Point blank. Get off of your horse. GSW is a LOSING franchise. So if a player "leads" his team to 5 wins you can consider that carrying a team to 5 wins? Last time I checked, carrying a team means TAKING THE TEAM SOMEWHERE. That is how the figurative meaning of it was created. If your team is a perennial LOSER how in the hell can you say anyone has carried them?Originally Posted by chrome vapors
It doesn't matter if your teams wins 5 games or 50. If your team's success is dependent on your contributions, you carry that team. The only difference is in one case, you carry the team to 5 wins and the other you carry your team to 50 wins.
And you really need to correct yourself, Cleveland is a bum team. Warriors aren't playoff caliber by any means right now but at 18-23 we're still respectable.
Cleveland is a bum team
GSW is a bum team.
FOH. Where is "somewhere" the playoffs? .500 record? Who made you the authority on figurative meanings? and you tell me to get off my horse.Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Sorry but this is the mentality of a fan of a losing franchise. GSW is a LOSING franchise. Point blank. Get off of your horse. GSW is a LOSING franchise. So if a player "leads" his team to 5 wins you can consider that carrying a team to 5 wins? Last time I checked, carrying a team means TAKING THE TEAM SOMEWHERE. That is how the figurative meaning of it was created. If your team is a perennial LOSER how in the hell can you say anyone has carried them?Originally Posted by chrome vapors
It doesn't matter if your teams wins 5 games or 50. If your team's success is dependent on your contributions, you carry that team. The only difference is in one case, you carry the team to 5 wins and the other you carry your team to 50 wins.
And you really need to correct yourself, Cleveland is a bum team. Warriors aren't playoff caliber by any means right now but at 18-23 we're still respectable.
Cleveland is a bum team
GSW is a bum team.
18 wins is SOMEWHERE dummy. 5 Wins is SOMEWHERE. 1 win is SOMEWHERE.
LOL @ Dummy. I appreciate you being able to have a mature discussion without calling names. Not sure how any number of wins means somewhere but maybe my definition of somewhere is different than yours.
Monta has not CARRIED them anywhere. If your team does not WIN (travel) then they have not been carried. We will see the GSW sitting at home in early April AGAIN this season.
So I am not even sure why we are discussing Manu vs Monta (original topic) because one EASILY does more than the other and it isn't even close. Monta is a great scorer though and very fun to watch but those two players shouldn't be compared.
Monta is a scorer on a bad team, you can never judge a player's value until he gets out of a situation like that. Not his fault that the Warriors are a joke.
18 wins is SOMEWHERE dummy. 5 Wins is SOMEWHERE. 1 win is SOMEWHERE.
LOL @ Dummy. I appreciate you being able to have a mature discussion without calling names. Not sure how any number of wins means somewhere but maybe my definition of somewhere is different than yours.
Monta has not CARRIED them anywhere. If your team does not WIN (travel) then they have not been carried. We will see the GSW sitting at home in early April AGAIN this season.
So I am not even sure why we are discussing Manu vs Monta (original topic) because one EASILY does more than the other and it isn't even close. Monta is a great scorer though and very fun to watch but those two players shouldn't be compared.
Monta is a scorer on a bad team, you can never judge a player's value until he gets out of a situation like that. Not his fault that the Warriors are a joke.
I agree with everything you said Acid.Originally Posted by acidicality
Let this season (and the few seasons after) play out before saying the Warriors are still a bad team and Monta is just a great scorer on a bad team. The last few seasons have been a joke because of the owner/coach, but things have changed this year with new ownership/coach (and philosophy changes) and there's new hope that the Warriors may be able to do something again. He was never the focal point in the We Believe years, and the years after were disastrous (until now).