- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,095
- 16,846
Thank God people dont give a **** about the rona anymore. Let's get it crackin
st8 up raw dogging anything with two legs b
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank God people dont give a **** about the rona anymore. Let's get it crackin
This would of course be good news but it's unclear where the WHO is getting the data to make this claim.Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is 'very rare,' WHO says
Government responses should focus on detecting and isolating infected people with symptoms, said the WHO's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove.www.cnbc.com
looks like better containment guidance can be made
This would of course be good news but it's unclear where the WHO is getting the data to make this claim.
The viral load appears to be similar between symptomatic and asymptomatic infected patients. But whether the asymptomatic patients transmit the virus as much is unknown, unless the WHO is now saying they have figured it out.
Perhaps this could explain why the virus spreads more rapidly in winter than in summer. In winter everybody is sick and has a cough, so it's harder to sort out who is infected. But in summer most people's respiratory tracts are clear so it's more obvious when someone comes down with Covid-19. Just a theory for now though...
what do you have to lose
Only way Bst8 up raw dogging anything with two legs b
I agree... I was trying to be diplomatic but WHO seems to be making another claim that will turn out to be false (because it seems that it is already known to be false).I... What?? I know a **** ton of people who were exposed by asymptomatic people, and were asymptomatic themselves. I don't buy the "very rare" ****.
I agree... I was trying to be diplomatic but WHO seems to be making another claim that will turn out to be false (because it seems that it is already known to be false).
Unless the WHO is separating asymptomatic and presymptomatic spreaders? But even that doesn't make sense because it's not a very useful distinction in terms of prevention. How do you know you're presymptomatic until you're symptomatic and it's already too late?
Or they're trying to separate very, very mild disease from truly asymptomatic cases? Which again is not a very useful distinction. I mean, if very mild symptoms are a random headache, a sneeze, or feeling tired, then 99% of us will have at least 1 day every couple weeks where we have those symptoms. Asking all those people to self-isolate for 2 weeks every time they have a headache or feel tired is dumb af.
Also, given the following study (which indicated that viral shedding peaks before symptom onset), the WHO better have some good ****ing data to show otherwise:
Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19 - Nature Medicine
Presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is estimated to account for a substantial proportion of COVID-19 cases.www.nature.com
This twitter thread gives a pretty clear explanation. The speculation is that the WHO is talking about asymptomatic and not presymptomatic people.
Two interesting tidbits. One, the only real benefit here would be that, once presymptomatic people develop symptoms, they are easier to identify and then do contact tracing. Two, it's potentially worse because this means that rather than an asymptomatic person spreading virus over 2 weeks, it's really presymptomatic people spreading virus over 3-5 days, which is harder to control (gives a smaller time window in which to test and trace and isolate contacts).
I think NYC gives us a ceiling for the worst that it can get. And our testing capabilities are much, much broader than they were in March, so we'll at least see the tsunami coming before we get decimated.I still think, people are thinking too short term about the spread and the speed of the build up and I can't shake that feeling of watching amused tourists walking on the sand floor, where the ocean has receded, before a tsunami hits.
Everything is pointing towards a second wave, right?
Both. It’s still out there and so many people in nyc are not wearing mask or social distancing. We are not out the woods yet.I would argue the first wave never ended.
I knew canceling or removing interest of student debt of essential workers was a pipe dream.
Went to Bungalow bar in Rockaway for take out food and drinks and the hostess said you can eat in the back patio after we paid. Big deck with tables set 6ft plus apart and way less capacity than normal. We ate outside.
When everyone went to get refills, no one was allowed to go inside without masks.
Washed hands, ate, washed hands again, and then left.
I feel like we did something bad but idk.
This twitter thread gives a pretty clear explanation. The speculation is that the WHO is talking about asymptomatic and not presymptomatic people.
Two interesting tidbits. One, the only real benefit here would be that, once presymptomatic people develop symptoms, they are easier to identify and then do contact tracing. Two, it's potentially worse because this means that rather than an asymptomatic person spreading virus over 2 weeks, it's really presymptomatic people spreading virus over 3-5 days, which is harder to control (gives a smaller time window in which to test and trace and isolate contacts).
I'm saying it's not that simple. It's not feasible to do that when those cities rely on the county for public health oversight.
our cities are finally speaking up. They should have done this from the get go.