Okay then what is the difference between GM and a replica i could get for like $120
Take for example Jordan 11's.
Straight replica's for 120 will have fake carbon fiber, and the materials will be way different. The overall execution will look different, side by side, to even someone who has NEVER worn a pair of Jordans or cared to in their life.
GM Jordan 11's have tiny little differences that only knowledgeable heads can tell the differences between.
For example (and not all these flaws are on every 11, and some have different flaws entirely. But some things to look out for are):
-Super puffy collars. 11's should have nicely shaped, slim collars that go all the way down to the foot bed. There should be a nice clean area for the achilles to rest. GM's look way overstuffed when looking from above, and from behind.
-poorly shaped phylon midsoles. From the back, often times GMs will have rounded off midsoled as opposed to the nice pointed ones on retail pairs.
-Outsoles that differ in transparency, milkiness, and color. Concord lows almost always have soles that are way too milky and cloudy on GMs. Retail pairs have more transparency
-shape of the 23. Usually stretched a bit on GMs.
I can go on and on. One thing that is non quantitative in reguards to GMs that people in denial always seem to argue against, is the overall sloppiness of GMs vs retail pairs.
I GET IT. JB quality sucks lately, and flaws are all over retail pairs. But GM flaws are often so bad you have to wonder why they would even send that shoe out for sale. Super bad stitching, glue marks, stains. Just overall really bad execution in comparison to the real thing.