- 1,212
- 814
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
So your saying they should have shot the child?Some of you read what people say but only hear what you wanna hear and don't even comprehend properly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So your saying they should have shot the child?Some of you read what people say but only hear what you wanna hear and don't even comprehend properly
What does that have to do with anything he just said?So your saying they should have shot the child?
So your saying they should have shot the child?
It's weird, I've always thought black people would be more sensitive to issues to animal rights. Many acts of animal cruelty are the result of white privilege and imperialism (eg. poaching, keeping animals in zoos, systemic extermination of animals-eg buffalo).
is that really him?
For someone that's so anti zoo you seem to really be concerned with their bottom line.
If that happened to you would you feel the same way that you deserve to be sued? Kids can wander away in the blink of an eye bAnd yes the parent should be held accountable....the zoo is not responsible for every wondering child that crosses their gates, every child is their parents responsibility....that woman's irresponsibility put her child lives at risk and caused the loss of an endangered gorilla....at the very least the zoo should bring up a lawsuit.
How do you figure those are the same dudes?What I don't understand is the complete lack of empathy from you dudes that are so dismissive about animal lives...same dudes that don't flinch when a dog is abused, when species go extinct, straight up arrogant dudes with a species superiority complex, as a species we are pretty cancerous to our Ecosystem....yet somehow us >>>>>>> them.
it will always be Humans >>>>>>>Nah I do understand the child's safety was priority and their was really no other way to ensure that safety, you tranq him, you risk pissing him off and in turn possibly killing the child, you enter that enclose meant to retrieve the child, more people might just get killed and ironically enough I would think he would kill the zookeepers "protecting" the kid....if you ask me, the SBG didn't want to harm the child....he acted in a nurturing matter and knew the child posed no threat...he had him for over 10 minutes, he wanted that kid dead, kid would have been dead in 2 seconds.
What I don't understand is the complete lack of empathy from you dudes that are so dismissive about animal lives...same dudes that don't flinch when a dog is abused, when species go extinct, straight up arrogant dudes with a species superiority complex, as a species we are pretty cancerous to our Ecosystem....yet somehow us >>>>>>> them.
it will always be Humans >>>>>>>
A dog is nothing more then a dog.
Are humans the only species that cares that much about other species?
I just don't get it.
And yes the parent should be held accountable....the zoo is not responsible for every wondering child that crosses their gates, every child is their parents responsibility....that woman's irresponsibility put her child lives at risk and caused the loss of an endangered gorilla....at the very least the zoo should bring up a lawsuit.
The gorilla seemed to care for the child
There's also the pit bull puppy who was taken in by kittens