- 29,630
- 1,863
is there any real point to signing nate to a year? Just to put fans in the seats? Any way we actually have him the year after?
Go to the official '09-'10 New York Knicks season thread, this thread will be locked soon
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pr0phecy718,
- Start date
- 1,063
- 10
^We can still package him with jeffries/curry by midseason if anything
- 120
- 10
That deal for Nate works out for both sides but as for the rest of the Knicks offseason
- 7,084
- 45
ill trade nate+jefferies+mobley+next years 2nd rounder for kevin martin.
- 1,063
- 10
^Kmart's contract goes to like 2020 and beyond
- 29,630
- 1,863
ahhh I see
so if a team has a real shot at the title and needs a great 6th man I guess we will be getting some calls. i really hope nate ends up on the lakers. He has abig city personality.
- 7,084
- 45
i rather have his contract taking up our cap space then curry or jefferies
- 1,785
- 48
Exactly WHY do some of you want to get rid of Nate?
If Nate played for the Bucks these past 4 years, y'all wouldn't want to sign him to the Knicks?
If Nate played for the Bucks these past 4 years, y'all wouldn't want to sign him to the Knicks?
- 2,570
- 10
I love Nate but if we have to package him with Curry or Jeffries idc as long as those fat contracts are gone
- 1,785
- 48
Why get rid of Nate just to dispose of Curry and Jeffries? If you can't deal them by themselves why not let them expire in 2011? That free agent classisn't half bad either...
- 4,058
- 11
5 MIL FOR NATE IS ON POINT IN MY OPINION. BUT I GUESS THIS MEANS WE AINT GOING AFTER SESSIONS.
Does it? Correct me if im wrong but signing Nate to 5 mil means we can still use the full MLE, resigning players dont count.
Anyway Nate is THAT dude, yall better stop hating. Hes gonna play even better than last year
- 7,084
- 45
because most of us, want to sign two players, one to a max contract, and another to a big fat contract, which we wont unless we get rid of one of theirsalaries. i mean, im fine with jefferies staying, since he knows his role and can somewhat produce, but curry,
i have faith that he could get back into shape, if he tries though
- 29,630
- 1,863
he can't even remember to bring his sneakers...
he isn't producing ****.
he isn't producing ****.
- 4,058
- 11
If Eddy Curry is still on our roster next summer we can kiss Lebron goodbye...
For one we may not even have enough to sign Lebron if the salary cap keeps on decreasing and 2 even if we do have enough money to get Lebron, it would take upalmost all of our salary cap space meaning we wouldnt be able to sign %@%@ outside of Bron. And with over 85 or some %@%@ % of our salary cap coming off andonly being able to replace that with one player, that means we wouldnt have much of a supporting cast. Ad Lebron isnt going anywhere where he cant win, and ifwe still have Curry on our roster that means Lebron would pretty much have only Gallo, Will, and the rookies to work around along with a few league minimumcontracts that weed fill up the rest of the roster with, which is not enough to give Lebron what he wants even if Gallo and Will do improve a whole lot and therookies are impressive.
For one we may not even have enough to sign Lebron if the salary cap keeps on decreasing and 2 even if we do have enough money to get Lebron, it would take upalmost all of our salary cap space meaning we wouldnt be able to sign %@%@ outside of Bron. And with over 85 or some %@%@ % of our salary cap coming off andonly being able to replace that with one player, that means we wouldnt have much of a supporting cast. Ad Lebron isnt going anywhere where he cant win, and ifwe still have Curry on our roster that means Lebron would pretty much have only Gallo, Will, and the rookies to work around along with a few league minimumcontracts that weed fill up the rest of the roster with, which is not enough to give Lebron what he wants even if Gallo and Will do improve a whole lot and therookies are impressive.
- 4,973
- 19
In all honesty, I think we should let Nate be the starting PG for the year and go after a PG next off-season. Cuz aside from Ramon Sessions, there'snothing left.
- 30,783
- 5,784
are you gonna change that sig?
- 7,084
- 45
^please tell me you were blazed as hell when you said that...
- 4,973
- 19
Seriously though. Realistically we know with the squad we have on paper we're not making the 8th spot in East. Duhon isn't going to be here after nextseason, along with a few other people on the roster now so why not showcase Nate in an attempt to package him off with Eddy or Jared?
As far as the sig.. .I don't know what to change it to
- 7,084
- 45
good point, but i think teams already know what nate can do.
but take shaq out, im tired of old fella hoppin around, ring chasing
but take shaq out, im tired of old fella hoppin around, ring chasing
- 4,973
- 19
Updated. It's a subliminal way for people to want Nate Robinson.
- 11,980
- 18
What are we doing??? Can we just sing Ramon and call it a day
- 4,973
- 19
Updated. It's a subliminal way for people to want Nate Robinson.
- 7,084
- 45
- 4,973
- 19
This is getting old.
- 1,063
- 10
After the Nate and Dlee situations are handled with, I think we are done making moves for this summer
. Bet Duhon will be the starting PG for us next season,we have Hughes and Harrington both playing for new contracts, Wilson and Rooster looking to develop and wanting minutes, a whole bunch of new big men to getburn in the rotation like Darko, Curry, Jhill. If we start the season with the roster we currently have Dantoni will soon get the Van gundy eye bags andhairline real soon....
