- Jun 4, 2009
- 2,570
- 10
if we can get Nate with a qualifying offer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nate MAY be the best bench player in the NBa and brings INSTANT energy, he is also our best athlete and one of our best shooters. If you dontthink we can use that, you must be on something. If Nate came back he would gonrght back to 6th man behind Sess (probably) which would be the same thin he didlast year to Duhon. There are very few if any better at the 6th man spot than Nate, and Douglas can ride the bench for a few years while Nate is here. Hes noteven closeto Nate's level of talent yet. Hes still a rookie. Remember Nate dropped over 17 a game off the bench last year. He would completely have a rollon this team and imo for a reasonable contract would be worth getting long term to fill that role because very few are better and a player like that is aCOLOSSAL help to a championship team. (Hense why teams like Orlando and the Lakers like him)Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
I just don't understand what Nate's position on the team would be. We got Douglas to do what he Nate does, and I think he can fill that role. He's not a point guard and we have enough guards who like to chuck already.
At this point, Lee>Nate
if we want to win this year... which we should. We should gladly take Nate anyway we can. Dont go overboard. I like Douglas but he was the 29 thpick in a weak draft (although imo he was a big time steal) Its not that i dont think hes gonna be a player or anything, but he is not an NBA 6th man as arookie. Nate is one of the best in the business and if you replaced him with Douglass we would probably have one of the worst. This is NOT homerism, was Natenot 2nd place in 6th man of the year voting? Ill let the facts do the talking. He dropped 17+ a game and at times wqs doing WAY more than that. His energy isalso invaluable. If you think that we are not alot worse off with Douglas as 6th man over Nate i dont know what you are thinking. I like Douglas but he has notproven anything yet and right now he does not posses NEARLY the amount of skill that Nate has. Im not saying dont develop him, he should get time but in no wayshould he be the 6th man right off the bat. Dont foget there was alot of times this season where Nate WAS our best player. Douglas is good and i think he hasthe potential to be better than Nate, but for now there is no question who the better player is.Originally Posted by BangDak
^again, you let your homerism take over.
if he signs for a 3year extension for 3mil each year, im all for it, but if hes just going to take the QO, as much as i would love him, ill take douglas.
he's shown potential to be a great backup/6th man role, just like nate in the summer league games. his shooting is streaky, but he has a MUCH better pass first ability to backup sessions (if we sign him), and can play the 2 if we want to play both of them at the same time.
why not let him develop? that is how we get better right?
and by the way, i love nate. no *%+$.
He can still develop with moderate playing time. He can take Nate's role, but he's not ready for it. He can learn from just watching Nateon the floor.Originally Posted by BangDak
you said dude can ride the bench for a few years.
now i understand your point, but how can he develop if his PT is all going towards nate?
theres no doubt nate is the better player atm, but happens in 1 or 2 years, no one can tell.
exactly dude isnt ready to step in and play that role right awayOriginally Posted by MayhemMonkey000
He can still develop with moderate playing time. He can take Nate's role, but he's not ready for it. He can learn from just watching Nate on the floor.Originally Posted by BangDak
you said dude can ride the bench for a few years.
now i understand your point, but how can he develop if his PT is all going towards nate?
theres no doubt nate is the better player atm, but happens in 1 or 2 years, no one can tell.
The Knicks are currently the only serious bidder for Sessions.
http://realgm.com/src_wir...aiting_game_on_sessions/
The majority of Knicks fans will counter-laugh, run through the five stages of grief as quickly as possible, and try and convince their friends that "it's okay, we don't want Bosh! We have better options out there... James, Wade, Stoudemire."
Yet, a simple laugh at that question would be enough for them to give up on Bosh and take that as a sign that he doesn't want to play for their lowly franchise. But flash back to March 5th, 2008, in Madison Square Garden. LeBron James scores 50 points, leading the Cavaliers to victory over the Knicks as a grateful fan storms the court to congratulate him. In the post-game this question that just won't die comes up.
LeBron James on whether he has ever thought about playing for the New York Knicks: ''No, that might be worse than that fan running out on the court.''
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/rumors/post/James-quot-No-reason-quot-to-think-about-leav?urn=nba,70377
Of course ESPN swept this quotable under the table as quickly as possible, but I know Knicks fans saw it. So, a laugh at that question is enough to deter them, yet LeBron James saying how bad playing for the Knicks is apparently isn't enough for them to toss out their King James onesies.
(shrugs).....
Develop talent?... What do you call Nate and Lee? How about us working on the Rooster? How about Hill who want to be our PF of the future andDouglas hoping he would be our 6th man of the future?Originally Posted by southzeztpdot
How can a team wait to just pick up some superstar wanting money. how about develop your own talent?
Every East team is getting better right now. If you really think about it we are 1 superstar away from being an eastern conference final team. Weprobably have the best young talent in the league (except for maybe the thunder).Originally Posted by southzeztpdot
How can a team wait to just pick up some superstar wanting money. how about develop your own talent?