- 21,151
- 37
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
Probably because he's 10.
Awful parenting, but the tattoo artist should be the one arrested.
Awful parenting, but the tattoo artist should be the one arrested.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
/threadOriginally Posted by DoubleJs07
Awful parenting, but the tattoo artist should be the one arrested.
Awful parenting, but the tattoo artist should be the one arrested.�
Son is really comparing giving a child a gun to a tattooOriginally Posted by bay1591
*in b4 thread turns into a debate on racism*
From a parenting point of view, why? If the kids asks for a gun, is she going to give him one just because he is a kid? Just bad parenting
Yup, it said that law was passed last year. When I was growing up all you had to do was go with your parent and it wasn't a issue.Originally Posted by Scientific Method
I know teens under 18 with tattoos. I think my nephew was 15 when he got his. But the way the law is written, the tattoo artist should be arrested to then. It's a stupid law though IMO.
He's 10 years old...probably a year removed from throwing a tantrum when the chocolate milk runs out at school. Getting a RIP tat of his brother is nice, but NOT at 10 years old. I don't see why there was a rush to do this. Mom could have had him wait until he was 16 or so. It's bad parenting. I don't see how anyone can see this differently.Originally Posted by Wade187
Son is really comparing giving a child a gun to a tattooOriginally Posted by bay1591
*in b4 thread turns into a debate on racism*
From a parenting point of view, why? If the kids asks for a gun, is she going to give him one just because he is a kid? Just bad parenting. Questionable decision by the parent, but not that serious. Kids get dumb tattoos all the time, only difference is this one a little younger. Unless she personally did the tattoo I don't see how that law they brought up places her in jail. Also to all you dudes talking about how awful this is, can you really say whats awful about it? I understand dude is too young to understand the magnitude of permanently marking his body (like any teen) but what she's saying is true, son didn't go out and put spongebob on himself, it's something that truly meant something to him.
Originally Posted by Wade187
Son is really comparing giving a child a gun to a tattooOriginally Posted by bay1591
*in b4 thread turns into a debate on racism*
From a parenting point of view, why? If the kids asks for a gun, is she going to give him one just because he is a kid? Just bad parenting. Questionable decision by the parent, but not that serious. Kids get dumb tattoos all the time, only difference is this one a little younger. Unless she personally did the tattoo I don't see how that law they brought up places her in jail. Also to all you dudes talking about how awful this is, can you really say whats awful about it? I understand dude is too young to understand the magnitude of permanently marking his body (like any teen) but what she's saying is true, son didn't go out and put spongebob on himself, it's something that truly meant something to him.
Is a tattoo really that bad though?Originally Posted by Patrick Bateman
Originally Posted by Wade187
Son is really comparing giving a child a gun to a tattooOriginally Posted by bay1591
*in b4 thread turns into a debate on racism*
From a parenting point of view, why? If the kids asks for a gun, is she going to give him one just because he is a kid? Just bad parenting. Questionable decision by the parent, but not that serious. Kids get dumb tattoos all the time, only difference is this one a little younger. Unless she personally did the tattoo I don't see how that law they brought up places her in jail. Also to all you dudes talking about how awful this is, can you really say whats awful about it? I understand dude is too young to understand the magnitude of permanently marking his body (like any teen) but what she's saying is true, son didn't go out and put spongebob on himself, it's something that truly meant something to him.
And why is that? Why is this kid (at 10) hoping for a tattoo to remember his dead brother? I think we're overlooking something bigger here. We expose our kids to the wrong things and have their minds into utter stupidity.
i'm saying, his mom thought it was legal and the tattoo artist did it. this 10 year old had a better idea than half the adults that get them. i don't see the problem.Originally Posted by MoonMan818
He got a tattoo in remembrance of his dead brother.
qft, i co sign.Originally Posted by MPLSdunk
i'm saying, his mom thought it was legal and the tattoo artist did it. this 10 year old had a better idea than half the adults that get them. i don't see the problem.Originally Posted by MoonMan818
He got a tattoo in remembrance of his dead brother.
Originally Posted by MoonMan818
He got a tattoo in remembrance of his dead brother.