- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
This movie leaked apparently. Will have to find it.
FOX *CBM thread - RIP STAN LEE - Dark PhoeniX 06/07/19
This movie leaked apparently. Will have to find it.
- Apr 27, 2014
- 10,930
- 9,250
It....it's bad.
It's not a good movie.
Like others have said, the first 3rd of the film isn't terrible to watch; it's quite decent even.
But that doesn't matter. This is a bad movie.
This movie stinks. It's not very good.
I can't believe they had the audacity to display the F4 logo at the end with triumphant music like they made something to be proud of. :x
I can't believe that I watched a shaky cam potato quality bootleg of a movie based on a franchise I care nothing about, and still came out of the experience utterly disappointed.
- Sep 3, 2014
- 6,346
- 7,341
Interesting. It looks like studio interference played a part in how bad this movie turned out.
- Nov 14, 2012
- 36,045
- 12,024
never seen the movie but they were not lying about two grown *** men at a high school science fair
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,871
- 61,620
Yeah studio interference was definitely a problem
- Sep 3, 2014
- 6,346
- 7,341
Also in this video , Campea has multiple credible sources within Fox studios that says that Fox completely hijacked this movie from Josh Trank.
0:00 - 17:50 mark
0:00 - 17:50 mark
- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
Alroght. So it was Fox's fault. Def no surprise
- Aug 23, 2007
- 14,258
- 5,503
i remember seeing this movie and it was actually not bad. but then again i was like 10 years old. who knows how it would be watching now.
- Jul 19, 2012
- 2,729
- 2,369
Bro that's the exact same way I felt about Batman vs. Robin when I saw it in Kindergarten.
Don't believe the nostalgia.
- Apr 27, 2014
- 10,930
- 9,250
Lol errbody tryna figure out what went wrong. It's everybody's fault.
I highly doubt that Trank had a masterpiece in the works
I highly doubt that Trank had a masterpiece in the works
big j 33
Supporter
- May 31, 2006
- 36,042
- 16,801
Maybe not a masterpiece, but it could have been the difference between a movie with 9% RT score or something with just mixed reviews in the 50s-60s.
- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
That movie had a budget of 1.7m after adjusting for inflation. By comparison Sharknado cost 2m
- Nov 24, 2002
- 5,629
- 453
Trank's next project will be vital. Martin from DT made a good point by asking, "was Chronicle successful because of Trank's direction or Landis' script?" And keep in mind, Chronicle was a found footage film, so it was shot way differently. Something to think about..
- Sep 3, 2014
- 6,346
- 7,341
I think this could have been a great CBM. Maybe not a masterpiece , but the start to a great franchise.
uncalled4boy
Supporter
- Oct 27, 2007
- 4,940
- 3,625
This movie leaked apparently. Will have to find it.
I Know It Was 1994 But Sheesh
- Oct 10, 2013
- 43,425
- 42,998
1. The thing doesn't look much different than the alba 4
2. That dr room looks better than this new one
2. That dr room looks better than this new one
District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- Mar 17, 2013
- 8,312
- 3,977
They really had something for the first 30 or so minutes ..and then the wheels fell completely off
- Sep 10, 2005
- 9,253
- 3,007
How did you see it? It was never released.
- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
Best Dr Doom so far imo
I'm pretty sure it leaked.
I Know It Was 1994 But Sheesh
After inflation it had a smaller budget than Sharknado.
Last edited:
- Aug 23, 2007
- 14,258
- 5,503
my cousin knew of this vhs shop that would get rare movies. it never released in theaters but was still available in vhs from what i remember
Last edited:
- Sep 1, 2008
- 15,237
- 4,607
Wow Dr. Doom looked way better then in the movies.
- Dec 13, 2004
- 74,801
- 62,635
Doombots!!! DOOMBOTS!!!!!! DOOMBOTS!!!!!
- Sep 24, 2011
- 4,052
- 1,210
it's basically been confirmed that the dude who was posting all that stuff on reddit a while back was Trank, right?
- Sep 24, 2011
- 4,052
- 1,210
Remember that Nerdist article that said they would be getting this "classic" suits at the end of the films? 
Trank said the first cut he delivered to the studio was over 2 hours long so they basically cut around 45 minutes from the film http://collider.com/the-fantastic-four-movie-details-josh-trank/
Every poster shows the F4 standing in NY with asteroids falling from the sky That's not even in the film for a single frame.
That collider video shows that Trank was going to use a version of the FantastiCar and they cut that completely.
And all the stuff/goop/whatever the hell they called it from "Planet Zero" was green in the film but red in the trailers.
View media item 1666693View media item 1666694View media item 1666695
https://twitter.com/Da7e
Trank said the first cut he delivered to the studio was over 2 hours long so they basically cut around 45 minutes from the film http://collider.com/the-fantastic-four-movie-details-josh-trank/
Every poster shows the F4 standing in NY with asteroids falling from the sky
That's not even in the film for a single frame. That collider video shows that Trank was going to use a version of the FantastiCar and they cut that completely.
And all the stuff/goop/whatever the hell they called it from "Planet Zero" was green in the film but red in the trailers.
View media item 1666693View media item 1666694View media item 1666695
https://twitter.com/Da7e
Last edited:
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,866
- 50,387
I just don't get how if FOX interfered that much yet the studio still thought the final product was something good enough to release in theaters. Cutting the budget or coming in under budget is one thing that can affect the movie as a whole but did they feel what Trank did come up with was so bad they had to cut a good chunk of it?
Plus the directors they brought in to film the reshoots, did they think that was good? Really?
This is very telling about those in charge. FOX may be in just a creative stupor as SONY. I mean they released ASM movies they thought were good enough and they clearly underperformed. So disappointing that ppl in house and on the outside had strong criticisms. Is FOX that out of touch with making good a cbm? It's pointing that way with every new release.
Plus the directors they brought in to film the reshoots, did they think that was good? Really?
This is very telling about those in charge. FOX may be in just a creative stupor as SONY. I mean they released ASM movies they thought were good enough and they clearly underperformed. So disappointing that ppl in house and on the outside had strong criticisms. Is FOX that out of touch with making good a cbm? It's pointing that way with every new release.
Great cbm is a reach to me. That's another thing I forgot to mention. I suggested stuff that could've made the movie better but as is there's no potential in this movie. Nothing worthy of the Batman Begins comparisons and I was never had huge praise for that movie. That's how bad this F4 is.
It's proven slightly only based off of some of the stuff the guy saying he was Trank ended up becoming true. The movie not being filmed in 3D being one of them.
Last edited:
