The way you'd do that is by getting the proper credentials and establishing a body of ACTUAL research in order to get said backing. The same way every person before him has contributed to scientific research.
...which you'd think you'd be willing to do if you thought you had the cure for cancer. Dude is writing books and dedicating his life to this cause, but when it comes time to ACTUALLY put in the work, get the education, and prove it scientifically he throws up his hands and says "nah that's too much"?
Sorry, but I'm not buying it.
Genetic Fallacy: an attempt to prove a conclusion false by condemning its source. This is a fallacy because how an idea originated is irrelevant to its validity
Fallacy of Personal Attack: an argument that diverts attention away from the question being argued... by instead focusing on on those arguing it.
Fallacy of Appeal to Authority: an argument that attempts to overawe an opponent into accepting a conclusion by playing on his or her reluctance to challenge famous people, time honored customs, or widely held beliefs.
...
You are attempting to convince everyone to commit to the fallacy of appealing to authority.... by simultaneously committing a genetic fallacy and a fallacy of personal attack.
...
Is conceptualizing and testing a method not work?
Do you need a source to analyze the results of before and after pictures and videos?
If I couldn't walk while I had cancer... but I a can do anything athletic after... do you need someone with social hierarchical power to confirm that I improved and what i did to improve worked?
You are sitting here calling me dude, saying I have done nothing. and totally disrespecting me... like I posted no videos or pictures... did not have cancer... and I am not trying to help anyone.
If I was wrong and you were right... wouldn't my conclusion be death?
If I was wrong and you were right... wouldn't my condition at least be worse?
