- 666
- 10
In all honesty that 2002 series made me lose all faith in the NBA and I haven't been a fan of the game since.
MLB > NBA.
MLB > NBA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by knightngale
Originally Posted by Mez 0ne
So the only Game that went 7 that year was the Lakers/Kings....that was with the Robert Horry game winner right?
It was pretty obvious by the FT discrepancy in Game 6 what the refs were trying to do.
It can't be that series, since the refs gave game 5 to the kings
watch the last 10 seconds of game 5 and tell me I'm wrong
NHL is the best sport in terms of scandals, officials, and competitiveness in the game IMOOriginally Posted by truthmain
In all honesty that 2002 series made me lose all faith in the NBA and I haven't been a fan of the game since.
MLB > NBA.
Originally Posted by lawdog1
O.K. So everyone is bringing up the Miami-Dallas finals as an obvious fix. Can someone please explain to me how the benefits from dictating the winner of the NBA finals? Although I'm still not buying into the conspiracy theories, I can understand the motivation to manipulate the early rounds to get the teams most likely to get big ratings into the finals. But once the finals are set, what does it matter to the league who wins? What did the NBA gain by Miami winning that it wouldn't have if Dallas won? Are you going to tell me that they were trying to create a superstar in Wade? Also, as for Donaghy, I'd find him more credible if he fingered a game other than game 6 of the WCF. That was a controversial game when it happened and has been talked about by conspiracy theorists ever since. In other words, it's a little too easy to point to that one as a fix. If he brought up one that people never talked about, I would find it more believable.
the Lakers shot 27 fourth quarter free-throws
that series had Kings and Lakers fans crazy up here on NT in 2002. that may be one of the mostheated threads ever in the sporting forum here on NT.
Originally Posted by NikeTalker23
Originally Posted by knightngale
Originally Posted by Mez 0ne
So the only Game that went 7 that year was the Lakers/Kings....that was with the Robert Horry game winner right?
It was pretty obvious by the FT discrepancy in Game 6 what the refs were trying to do.
It can't be that series, since the refs gave game 5 to the kings
watch the last 10 seconds of game 5 and tell me I'm wrong
if you wanna get technical BIBBY held him first....Originally Posted by pkballr
*WHISTLE* Foul on ten, black!
Originally Posted by lawdog1
O.K. So everyone is bringing up the Miami-Dallas finals as an obvious fix. Can someone please explain to me how the benefits from dictating the winner of the NBA finals? Although I'm still not buying into the conspiracy theories, I can understand the motivation to manipulate the early rounds to get the teams most likely to get big ratings into the finals. But once the finals are set, what does it matter to the league who wins? What did the NBA gain by Miami winning that it wouldn't have if Dallas won? Are you going to tell me that they were trying to create a superstar in Wade? Also, as for Donaghy, I'd find him more credible if he fingered a game other than game 6 of the WCF. That was a controversial game when it happened and has been talked about by conspiracy theorists ever since. In other words, it's a little too easy to point to that one as a fix. If he brought up one that people never talked about, I would find it more believable.
Originally Posted by NobleKane
if you wanna get technical BIBBY held him first....Originally Posted by pkballr
*WHISTLE* Foul on ten, black!
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
If another reliable source comes forward backing Donaghy's tales , the NBA is DONE!
Originally Posted by NobleKane
if you wanna get technical BIBBY held him first....Originally Posted by pkballr
*WHISTLE* Foul on ten, black!