I'm sorry I didn't mean to imply that any fighter that has an unorthodox style isn't a real boxer. That would be ludicrous, which is why I never said that. I meant that being unorthodox was not his only problem and in his specific case, I didn't consider that an upside. In my opinion, the level of competition he faced most of his career was lacking, and he was exposed shortly after he finally started fighting outside of England. He was not quick enough to fight with his hands down man. It may have looked that way against lesser competition but thats it. You mentioned the Kevin Kelley fight, but failed to mention that Hamed was also knocked down 3 times himself in that fight.
That's like saying Willis Reed and Larry Bird were both left handed players in the NBA so left handed players can succeed. And in no way am I comparing them to Jalen Rose, who used his left hand also.
In his career Muhammed Ali got floored by Sonny Banks, Henry Cooper and Chuck Wepner, aka a bunch of journeyman. It happens in boxing.
Naseem had a high risk style, he fought hands down, he was a switch hitter (orthodox and southpaw) and alot of his offense was based around baiting his opponent to throw (with his chin exposed) and then countering. That's not something anybody could pull off, it's like walking a tightrope, so it's pretty wild to talk like he's a bum cause he lost a decision to Barrera? Barerra also beat Erik Morales in his prime, twice, he's an all time great at that weight class.
As for the Willis, Larry and Jalen comparison, yeah Willis and Larry were much better players, but anybody that knows basketball would never fix their mouth to say Jalen is "not a real baller", unless they were just a hater. The idea of being "not a real boxer" and doing what Hamed did is ridiculous. If you said overrated I could understand that, his accomplishments were kinda overshadowed by his flashiness and personality. If you didn't like his style and thought he was too arrogant, that's fair enough too. But "minimally talented" and "not a real boxer"? Eh. That's hating. No disrespect, but I would assume that
you would fit in the category of minimally talented and not a real boxer, and I put money you wouldn't last a single round with Hamed or any of his opponents. I've trained with talented amateurs, golden gloves fighters that would wreck the average minimally talented guy, and yet they probably wouldn't have lasted 12 rounds with Hamed. Your definition of minimal talent is a little off I think. He wasn't the greatest for sure, but there's some hate in your analysis.