D
Deleted member 37754
Guest
Dude needs to relax with the P E D's man. He looks like a cartoon character.
That’s the point, He’s about to be, next role is Black Adam.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Dude needs to relax with the P E D's man. He looks like a cartoon character.
Is Ms Divine gonna not mention her illustrious pRon career that happened in between these pics?..Shame..
Meteora is my favorite project from them
Case
King of Trash Style
WWE Hall of Famer Booker T takes a shot at Sasha Banks and Bayley
WWE Hall of Famer Booker T takes a shot at Sasha Banks and Bayley
Sasha Banks and Bayley are not on the good side of WWE Hall of Famer Booker T. Booker T put a stop to Sasha Banks comparing herself and Bayley with Harlem Heat.www.sportskeeda.com
As of today, which belt is the Main Title?
WWE or Universal?
So at any point, do the owners of said titles influence the importance of the belt?I stick by what I said.....WWE title.
So at any point, do the owners of said titles influence the importance of the belt?
So there is nothing the Universal Title can do nor is thereanyone that can hold it to elevate it to be the #1 title?Sure, but doesn’t mean it’s going to be more important than another title.
So there is nothing the Universal Title can do nor is thereanyone that can hold it to elevate it to be the #1 title?
No judgement just asking a clarifying question.
If it’s unified with the WWE title and they stick with the universal title name, then yes. Or if it’s thrown in the trash like the women’s title was on nitro.
In my opinion, it would take decades of the WWE title being trashed (no pun intended) and decades of the universal title being up lifted. Sounds crazy I know, but that’s how I feel.
It doesn't sound crazy.
But I just wonder why it is a STATIC thing when everything else in wrestling is dynamic and ever changing.
Why does it have to take decades?
Why can't the Universal Title be more prestigious now and the WWE title take that crown 18 months from now based on what is happening in the (future) moment?
Not arguing, just trying to understand the reasoning.
I guess because in my mind it’s a history thing. It has this long and great lineage, while the universal title doesn’t have that yet. Not any fault of its own since it hasn’t been around nearly as long. However, you’re right about things ever changing in wrestling though. I guess it’s just one of those things I haven’t come to except yet.
Do you still believe the universal belt is still the top title?
The biggest stars (Brock/Roman) of the company have been holding the Universal title. (Recent title holders)
Fox or WWe selected the Universal belt to be on the most important show. (Smackdown)
I can't see any rational argument, other than length of existence, that supports the idea of the Wwe title being #1.
I'll check back in with you when the Miz wins the title or some other unworthy bum like Ginger Mahal.Those are valid points, but I think we’ll agree to disagree.
I'll check back in with you when the Miz wins the title or some other unworthy bum like Ginger Mahal.
Doing all that at @ 230 was so damn impressive. We talk about him every now and then but he was ahead of his time with the FLippy Stuff.
Even danger style 's man Hayabusa has spoken highly about him having stealing the FireBird SPlash (450)
But, some folks credit