- 6,149
- 325
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2008
ps... gave you kudos just from the fact that you were trying...... gtgt work now i'll be back on later........suggestion for the time being: know yourfacts! i'll come back and see what nonsense you put on
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Vidasman
YOU gotta see that youre asking a board that mostly consists of youngsters who are under the age of 25 or 21 for that part and most are going to base thier answers off of todays modern movies, toys, cool looks and popularity... that will mainly go to MARVEL, they have had better movies, toys and more popularity with getting thier own movie production rights MARVEL STUDIOS.. before youd see the MARVEL tied in with like paramount pictures but now that MARVEL is on its own, they can do whatever the heck they want and that means for sure movies like
*CAPTAIN AMERICA
* THOR
* THE AVENGERS..... (thats gonna be insane seeing IRON MAN and many others on ONE SCREEN)
BUT WAIT A MINUTE...... the comic life as a whole without a doubt has to go with DC in terms of storylines, consistancy and human relations to a reader. Without a doubt the FRONT RUNNER and MOST ICONIC hero, hands down is SUPERMAN
Originally Posted by GL Rayner
Although I like DC, its really hard to put one Brand over the other. Marvel and DC have had their periods where both struggled with their storylines and characters.
Superman Blue and Red
Cap-Wolf
So many incarnations of Wolverine
Ben Reilly Spiderman
The Marvel phase of Hologram Covers
Hal Jordan becoming the Spectre
Spiderman/Mary-Jane making a deal with the devil/Mephisto....
Wolverine in every comic and on 3-4 different teams at the same time
The list goes on and on.....
Originally Posted by Spidermachine916
yeah.... no one in both universes is smarter than a mere humanOriginally Posted by AJ23ToKB24
I can see your heartbeat is on the rise right nowOriginally Posted by Spidermachine916
Originally Posted by AJ23ToKB24
Easy choice: DC
Superman can single handedly beat ALL heroes and villains of Marvel.
Heck, even Batman who is the super genius of all the superheroes can beat all the members of Marvel.
/thread
.............he can't even deal with his OWN villians i mean LEX LUTHOR!!! he's a freakin human!!! he doesn't have what it takes to do the job right!...and hands down Hulk or juggernaught could wup that sap from here to kingdom come! hulks got what 800+ ppl he's killed... he would have no problem killing superman..........and you say batmans super smart huh? is he smarter than brainiac? mr fantastic?
you're just a fanboy what do you know?
,relax...![]()
Yes he is smarter than every Marvel member you name kid, and even your mom too!!!and about my heart... i'm passionate about comics.....you should take an interest in them too... don't just watch the movies and say: " hey i like that guy, from now on he's the best at everything... i'll go into discussions and just blurt out that he's better than everyone"![]()
![]()
Originally Posted by Spidermachine916
ps... gave you kudos just from the fact that you were trying...... gtgt work now i'll be back on later........suggestion for the time being: know your facts! i'll come back and see what nonsense you put on
Originally Posted by FIREPOWER23
Originally Posted by Vidasman
YOU gotta see that youre asking a board that mostly consists of youngsters who are under the age of 25 or 21 for that part and most are going to base thier answers off of todays modern movies, toys, cool looks and popularity... that will mainly go to MARVEL, they have had better movies, toys and more popularity with getting thier own movie production rights MARVEL STUDIOS.. before youd see the MARVEL tied in with like paramount pictures but now that MARVEL is on its own, they can do whatever the heck they want and that means for sure movies like
*CAPTAIN AMERICA
* THOR
* THE AVENGERS..... (thats gonna be insane seeing IRON MAN and many others on ONE SCREEN)
BUT WAIT A MINUTE...... the comic life as a whole without a doubt has to go with DC in terms of storylines, consistancy and human relations to a reader. Without a doubt the FRONT RUNNER and MOST ICONIC hero, hands down is SUPERMAN
QFT!!
Thank you! at last some one who knows what's up! ....I knew that the majority of NTers were gonna go with Marvel before I even looked in this thread, just because of the average age of this board.
& based on the movies, & even the current story arcs, I would say they are right! There is no question that Marvel's recent run of big budget Super hero flicks have been far more superior to any of the celluloid exploits that DC has put out in recent years.
But I have no doubt, that had DC & Warner Bros resolved their legal issues concerning the rights to the various Batman & Superman franchises, got their act together & put into production some of the Films that have been discussed for many years such as; Superman/Batman, JLA, Flash,Wonder Woman etc. .....& had executed them with the same continuity & style that Marvel has, then there would be a lot more DC fanboys /forwarding thread.
What you have to realise is, that without the creation of Superman ...there would be no comic book genre ...there wouldn't even be a Marvel! No Batman, Watchmen, etc! Of course, hypothetically, you could argue that the genre would have been created at sometime alomg the way & it may well have evolved, but in a different way.
But like I said before, Superman is the original & the best!!
Oh & the Hulk would beat Superman? ..........you must be smoking something green if you believe that!!![]()
Oh & the Hulk would beat Superman? ......image ....you must be smoking something green if you believe that!!
Let me get nerdy for a sec...
The Hulk gets stronger as he gets angrier. There is no cap on the Hulk's strength.
Plus, the Hulk lacks Superman's greatest weakness, which is Superman's inherent need to do good.
That is actually what makes Superman one of the weakest heroes around. Think of him as J.R. Smith... an incredibly gifted waste of talent.
Originally Posted by kingjamesvehs
no cartoon is better than the old fox kids x men
maybe u can put the spiderman
or maybe 90s batman up there
but seriously
xmen for the winrar
I'm sorry but Batman The Animated Series > All.
There is nothing like Paul Dini's writing in the Batman Animated Series.
Agreed.
The Fox X-Men Animated series was terrible.
The best X-Men cartoon was the one-shot Pryde of the X-Men. That was straight Byrne/Claremont era greatness. The worst part of that cartoon was Wolverine'sAustralian accent...
Originally Posted by jimmybeanz
ok dc stans fans,
after batman and superman, what else you got? nothing. that's what. no other compelling heroes.
and like my man kingjamesveh said, the cats are too heroey - meaning too damn goody goody.
marvel has NUMEROUS compelling characters (notice that i started with the villians first - villians ftw):
galactus
thanos
apocalypse
magneto
dr. doom
deadpool
venom
loki
incredible hulk
wolverine
spiderman
doctor strange
franklin richards
ETC. ETC. ETC
you want to know what's going on with these guys.
Originally Posted by GrimlocK
Originally Posted by FIREPOWER23
Originally Posted by Vidasman
YOU gotta see that youre asking a board that mostly consists of youngsters who are under the age of 25 or 21 for that part and most are going to base thier answers off of todays modern movies, toys, cool looks and popularity... that will mainly go to MARVEL, they have had better movies, toys and more popularity with getting thier own movie production rights MARVEL STUDIOS.. before youd see the MARVEL tied in with like paramount pictures but now that MARVEL is on its own, they can do whatever the heck they want and that means for sure movies like
*CAPTAIN AMERICA
* THOR
* THE AVENGERS..... (thats gonna be insane seeing IRON MAN and many others on ONE SCREEN)
BUT WAIT A MINUTE...... the comic life as a whole without a doubt has to go with DC in terms of storylines, consistancy and human relations to a reader. Without a doubt the FRONT RUNNER and MOST ICONIC hero, hands down is SUPERMAN
QFT!!
Thank you! at last some one who knows what's up! ....I knew that the majority of NTers were gonna go with Marvel before I even looked in this thread, just because of the average age of this board.
& based on the movies, & even the current story arcs, I would say they are right! There is no question that Marvel's recent run of big budget Super hero flicks have been far more superior to any of the celluloid exploits that DC has put out in recent years.
But I have no doubt, that had DC & Warner Bros resolved their legal issues concerning the rights to the various Batman & Superman franchises, got their act together & put into production some of the Films that have been discussed for many years such as; Superman/Batman, JLA, Flash,Wonder Woman etc. .....& had executed them with the same continuity & style that Marvel has, then there would be a lot more DC fanboys /forwarding thread.
What you have to realise is, that without the creation of Superman ...there would be no comic book genre ...there wouldn't even be a Marvel! No Batman, Watchmen, etc! Of course, hypothetically, you could argue that the genre would have been created at sometime alomg the way & it may well have evolved, but in a different way.
But like I said before, Superman is the original & the best!!
Oh & the Hulk would beat Superman? ..........you must be smoking something green if you believe that!!![]()
Superman is the most iconic comic book figure ever created...that is true. But him being the best...nope. Superman as a character sucks so hard compared to other companies characters and you know why...they made him out to be god, they gave him a wack rogue's gallery, dude had to be finally beaten by someone made out totally out of his one weakness, kryptonite.
You suckas are so stuck on the past it's not even funny...and Superman is only iconic because he was one of the first major blockbuster powered super-heroes to ever come out...would the comic book genre have still been the way it is today? No way, Superman did pave the way for new comic books, heroes, movies...on and on. But best believe if he never existed someone else would have created a Superman prototype figure for the masses and then you guys would want to argue why he was the best.
As to whether who's better I gotta give it to Marvel and this isn't a biased opinion, i've read alot from both Marvel, DC, Image, Dark Horse, etc... And Marvel while they have had their crappy storylines which really sucked (ben reilly, operation galactic storm, onslaught saga...) they still had quality artists and creative writers and House of Ideas to lean on, DC did as well and Image certainly did when the first started up but to me not as much as Marvel.
You suckas are so stuck on the past it's not even funny...and Superman is only iconic because he was one of the first major blockbuster powered super-heroes to ever come out...would the comic book genre have still been the way it is today? No way, Superman did pave the way for new comic books, heroes, movies...on and on. But best believe if he never existed someone else would have created a Superman prototype figure for the masses and then you guys would want to argue why he was the best.
WOW you totally contradict yourself and NO hate on you believe me, you do make some good points but this has to bethe one that takes away everything smart you said.... SUPERMAN- WAS, IS and WILL be the ICONIC figure for heroism all over when it comes to comics.. He wasoriginated for the AMERICAN way during the world war eras,,, DID you see SPIDEY in any american campaigns when it came to the war, or the INCREDIBLE HULKduring the Great Depression???? NO, not one, bit.. When you see campaigns back in the troubled times of AMERICA, people looked to SUPERMAN comics and beinglike the savior not because he can shoot webs out of his hands, or because he was green with ANGER or to compare to batman, he didnt have wings and pointyears. What Im saying is that SUPERMAN represents the AMERICAN WAY and alot of you youngsters may not like the american way but it is what it is.. To this daywhen it comes to war in IRAQ, Terrorism from 911, you see SUPERMAN as the Symbol for the US as taking on all foes as in his saying goes "TRUTH, JUSTICE,and the AMERICAN WAY" those words will be iconic for many years to come weather you like it or not. Dont get me wrong, I like Marvel alot and many ofthier characters but OP asked who is better and im saying when it comes to the figure that will is without a doubt ICONIC youre gonna see SUPERMAN logoseverywhere. Todays superheroes are cool in the sense they can teleport into walls, grow Claws outta thier hands, but NONE of them were ever created out theimage of the every day AMERICAN... the ICON the world leader = SUPERMAN.. sorry but thats truth for ya so to answer your question
NO the Comic world, hero world WOULD not be the same if it wasnt for SUPERMAN, sure it would be around and toys, n movies would still be selling but not nearlyas a huge if it wasnt any SUPERMAN..
**Oh & to MrTracerBullet ....Supes would just fly Hulk into space where he would have no oxygen & would pass into unconscienceness, therefore reverting him back to B. Banner & rendering him defenceless! image /game over!
You are assuming that Supes knows that Hulk is Banner. Supes isn't the brightest hero in DC. If it were Bats, then yes. Supes, not so much.
Plus what makes you think that the Hulk would let Supes fly him into space? You are assuming that Supes would use his powers to his advantage which hedoesn't. Ever. If he did, all Supes would do against his foes would to fly super fast while heat vision blasting them from afar, then super punching themto oblivion. But Supes would never do that. Supes always holds back. The Hulk on the other hand, would get annoyed by Supes irritating methods, Hulk-up to thenth degree pound the living crapola outta him.
The only way Supes would beat Hulk, was if we were talking about Pre-Crisis Supes with no conscience whatsoever. Maybe Superboy(man)-Prime.
Originally Posted by MrTracerBullet
**Oh & to MrTracerBullet ....Supes would just fly Hulk into space where he would have no oxygen & would pass into unconscienceness, therefore reverting him back to B. Banner & rendering him defenceless! image /game over!
Originally Posted by CB94
Originally Posted by Barack 0drama
Yea, But DC's flagship, franchise characters are Gods, And that's the main reason I don't like them too much.Originally Posted by Falcon4567
Marvel has over a 1000+ plus parallel worlds it just uses them for humor, the only series that takes advantage of that is Exiles. DC only has 52 (less after Final Crisis) and actually uses them to tell really grand metafictional stories. And Marvel has tons of god-like beings - you have three actual gods as superheroes for cripes sake.
http://www.bamkapow.com/b...-always-suck-1189-p.html
That article pretty much sums up how I feel about Superman, And you can almost apply it to Diana and GL too.
Marvel's characters are more relatable to me...Story arcs less convulted too.
You know what my __, this was so spot on I had to post it for you....
[h1]BK FEATURE: Why Superman Will Always Suck[/h1]
The title is all the intro you should need.
Indestructibility
![]()
It almost goes without saying, but if your hero cannot possibly be killed in any instance which does not somehow involve an incredibly rare space-rock, then you've got one boring-*+# hero. It's sort of like watching Neo fight all the agent Smiths in The Matrix Reloaded: we know our hero can't possibly die, and he doesn't act like he's in any danger whatsoever, so the entire fight is a foregone conclusion and the audience becomes bored out of their skulls.
I mean, yeah - we obviously go into most superhero stories more or less positive that the hero won't die, but they still entertain us because the hero doesn't know that. Spidey is always scared, even if only a little, that one of the Green Goblin's pumpkin bombs will be the end of him; Daredevil is fully aware that a well-placed projectile from Bullseye could kill him. As a result, these characters act with restraint and forethought; since Superman knows nothing bad can happen to him no matter what, he acts with no such subtlety. He flies headlong into every conflict, fists thrust forward, because he knows he's in no immediate danger. Thus, we know he's in no immediate danger, and we get bored out of our %*!@!%% skulls.
Moral absolutism
![]()
Superman sez: all criminals are bad. All lawbreakers deserve punishment. If Superman were in charge of the DEA, roughly 70% of college students across the country would be serving time in prison right now.
Superman has no values of his own, so he's content to just uphold the values of the ruling class; this prevents him from becoming a dangerous vigilante a la Frank Castle, but it also means he has no legitimate opinions of his own where crime is concerned. In Paul Dini's storybook series on DC superheroes, Batman had to deal with gangland violence, Wonder Woman fights terrorism, and Superman tries to end world hunger. This is no accident - Superman is way too morally simplistic to deal with complex things like the "wars" on drugs or terror. In Batman: War on Crime, Bats comes up against a young boy holding a gun on him. Batman, understanding the complexity of crime and the reasons for its existence, talks the kid into dropping the gun and giving up a life of violence.
Superman would probably just use his heat-vision to melt the gun, then put the kid in prison where he'd become a hard-bitten thug who'd murder somebody a few months after getting out.
Truth, justice, and the Kryptonian way
![]()
While Superman represents and upholds the values of right-wing America, he never really earned the right to do so. The dude's a foreigner who took it upon himself to act as mankind's savior when, generally, mankind shouldn't need him (note, of course, that a significant number of the catastrophes which assault Metropolis on a weekly basis are initiated with the intent of fighting Superman - if Supes wasn't around, a lot of the criminal #*#@!*$! wouldn't be, either).
In the movie Superman Returns, Lois Lane writes an article explaining why mankind doesn't need Superman because we should be able to take care of ourselves, and the presence of an omnipotent superhero basically takes all responsibility off the human race and turns us into a bunch of helpless sheep, powerless to do anything but scream for help from our savior in times of crisis. She eventually decides this viewpoint is incorrect if only because she wants to bone Superman so badly, but the argument remains relevant no matter what.
Really, what lessons do the Superman comics teach? It says that mankind is full of dull, pointless weaklings and evildoers who can only be stopped by a white ubermensch from another planet, who didn't work a day in his life in order to achieve his powers. Yeah, you could say he's a symbol of "hope," but not hope in human nature - hope in an all-powerful alien who saves the world daily so you don't have to get off your butt and act like a moral person. What sort of message is that?
Powers given < powers earned
![]()
What's the virtue in acting like a badass hero if you were born with the ability to be a badass hero? What's more impressive: the football player who trains for years and years just to play one game of pro football, or the guy who was born with innate athletic talent?
The answer is obvious, of course - powers earned are infinitely more impressive than intrinsic superpowers. Even though many superheroes do not "choose" their powers - from Spider-Man to Green Lantern, it's usually just happy accident that these normal schlubs get turned into superheroes - it's still a hell of a boring cop-out to simply be born with the ability to leap tall buildings in a single bound. It's just not terribly impressive, and requires zero effort. If Superman is capable of catching bullets with his teeth mere moments after landing on Earth, isn't that a lot more boring than Bruce Wayne training for years and years, and using most of his fortune, to become Batman?
Hell, for that matter:
Batman > Superman
![]()
Batman had a much more tragic childhood (watching your parents die is infinitely worse than hearing your biological parents died without ever having met them), his crimefighting style is based more on intelligence and planning that Superman's brute force, and he's actually kicked the living $#@# out of Superman at least twice. Batman exhibits more moral maturity than Superman: Superman always upholds the status quo, but in Year One Batman goes on a crusade against Gotham's corrupt elite. Batman is a detective, a scientist, a master of disguise, and a martial arts expert; Superman is a burly $#!*%%% in a red cape with big muscles.
And it's not even a matter of Batman being a necessarily darker character than Superman, at least where it really counts. Both characters steadfastly refuse to kill their enemies under any circumstances; it's just a hell of a lot harder for Batman, which makes his attitude toward mercy all the more admirable. It's no problem at all for Superman to fly into the air holding a criminal by the scruff of their neck as their bullets bounce off him, but Batman has to disarm his baddies, then incapacitate them, then give them to the police, all while avoiding their knives and gunfire and explosives. It's five times harder for Batman to do anything which Superman takes for granted on a daily basis, yet he often does it a hell of a lot better.
And let's not forget The Dark Knight Returns, wherein Batman brilliantly beat Clark Kent almost to death (pausing only to fake his own) by using a mixture of planning and ingenuity that even Lex Luthor isn't really capable of. Even if we were to judge superhero quality solely by who could beat who in a fight, then Batman still wins, hands down.
To fix these problems is to turn him into another superhero altogether
![]()
I used to be okay with Superman, if only because I believed that, one day, a writer might come along and turn Superman into a complex, three-dimensional being with flaws. A superhero with legitimate, kryptonite-unrelated weaknesses. A superhero who, every once in a while, actually loses.
Then I read the above strip from Dinosaur Comics and realized the futility of it all.
Superman represents hope and indefatigable strength, and any attempt to complicate these issues would no longer make him Superman. By definition, Superman has to be boring and morally absolute because if he isn't, he ain't Superman. I mean, in Kingdom Come he's momentarily called to task for getting angry at the UN and threatening to kill the world leaders for killing Captain Marvel, but he's talked down from doing anything irrational within, like, two pages of initially getting the idea to %%** up the United Nations. Heck, Superman's arc in Kingdom Come isn't even anything deeper than "America has forgotten me and I them, and we need to restore faith in one another." Wow - real interesting. While you're doing that, Batman will be over in the corner, contemplating suicide.
Originally Posted by FIREPOWER23
Originally Posted by GrimlocK
Originally Posted by FIREPOWER23
Originally Posted by Vidasman
YOU gotta see that youre asking a board that mostly consists of youngsters who are under the age of 25 or 21 for that part and most are going to base thier answers off of todays modern movies, toys, cool looks and popularity... that will mainly go to MARVEL, they have had better movies, toys and more popularity with getting thier own movie production rights MARVEL STUDIOS.. before youd see the MARVEL tied in with like paramount pictures but now that MARVEL is on its own, they can do whatever the heck they want and that means for sure movies like
*CAPTAIN AMERICA
* THOR
* THE AVENGERS..... (thats gonna be insane seeing IRON MAN and many others on ONE SCREEN)
BUT WAIT A MINUTE...... the comic life as a whole without a doubt has to go with DC in terms of storylines, consistancy and human relations to a reader. Without a doubt the FRONT RUNNER and MOST ICONIC hero, hands down is SUPERMAN
QFT!!
Thank you! at last some one who knows what's up! ....I knew that the majority of NTers were gonna go with Marvel before I even looked in this thread, just because of the average age of this board.
& based on the movies, & even the current story arcs, I would say they are right! There is no question that Marvel's recent run of big budget Super hero flicks have been far more superior to any of the celluloid exploits that DC has put out in recent years.
But I have no doubt, that had DC & Warner Bros resolved their legal issues concerning the rights to the various Batman & Superman franchises, got their act together & put into production some of the Films that have been discussed for many years such as; Superman/Batman, JLA, Flash,Wonder Woman etc. .....& had executed them with the same continuity & style that Marvel has, then there would be a lot more DC fanboys /forwarding thread.
What you have to realise is, that without the creation of Superman ...there would be no comic book genre ...there wouldn't even be a Marvel! No Batman, Watchmen, etc! Of course, hypothetically, you could argue that the genre would have been created at sometime alomg the way & it may well have evolved, but in a different way.
But like I said before, Superman is the original & the best!!
Oh & the Hulk would beat Superman? ..........you must be smoking something green if you believe that!!![]()
Superman is the most iconic comic book figure ever created...that is true. But him being the best...nope. Superman as a character sucks so hard compared to other companies characters and you know why...they made him out to be god, they gave him a wack rogue's gallery, dude had to be finally beaten by someone made out totally out of his one weakness, kryptonite.
You suckas are so stuck on the past it's not even funny...and Superman is only iconic because he was one of the first major blockbuster powered super-heroes to ever come out...would the comic book genre have still been the way it is today? No way, Superman did pave the way for new comic books, heroes, movies...on and on. But best believe if he never existed someone else would have created a Superman prototype figure for the masses and then you guys would want to argue why he was the best.
As to whether who's better I gotta give it to Marvel and this isn't a biased opinion, i've read alot from both Marvel, DC, Image, Dark Horse, etc... And Marvel while they have had their crappy storylines which really sucked (ben reilly, operation galactic storm, onslaught saga...) they still had quality artists and creative writers and House of Ideas to lean on, DC did as well and Image certainly did when the first started up but to me not as much as Marvel.
lol, you obviously didn't read my quote properly, I actually stated that the comic book genere would always have evolved eventually & yes, you're right a Superman/god like carachter would have been created. ...but the point is, it wasn't! It evolved the way it did.
As for Superman having a weak rogue's gallery, I will agree. Well ...he was created in 1938 for goodness sake! Obviously characters that were created after, evolved & had a more intelligent creation process behind them, as well as more real world influence to the artists & writers behind them, (2nd World War, the Cold War, womens rights & Nuclear power all feature heavily in the themes of some of the greatest comics ever written)
Don't get it twisted, I'm not hating on Marvel, far from it, I love Marvel ...I love comics period! & as you mention Dark Horse & Image are just as good & as important to the genre! Not even counting 2000AD!It's just for me, personally DC struck a nerve at an early age & I guess it stuck.![]()
Like, I said in my first post in this thread, I have been reading both Marvel & DC comics for over 25 years! So I think I am in a position to have a balanced view of both.
Everybody has their own opinions, favourites & influences ....that's what makes it all so enjoyable.![]()
**Oh & to MrTracerBullet ....Supes would just fly Hulk into space where he would have no oxygen & would pass into unconscienceness, therefore reverting him back to B. Banner & rendering him defenceless!/game over!![]()
WOW you totally contradict yourself and NO hate on you believe me, you do make some good points but this has to be the one that takes away everything smart you said.... SUPERMAN- WAS, IS and WILL be the ICONIC figure for heroism all over when it comes to comics.. He was originated for the AMERICAN way during the world war eras,,, DID you see SPIDEY in any american campaigns when it came to the war, or the INCREDIBLE HULK during the Great Depression???? NO, not one, bit.. When you see campaigns back in the troubled times of AMERICA, people looked to SUPERMAN comics and being like the savior not because he can shoot webs out of his hands, or because he was green with ANGER or to compare to batman, he didnt have wings and pointy ears. What Im saying is that SUPERMAN represents the AMERICAN WAY and alot of you youngsters may not like the american way but it is what it is.. To this day when it comes to war in IRAQ, Terrorism from 911, you see SUPERMAN as the Symbol for the US as taking on all foes as in his saying goes "TRUTH, JUSTICE, and the AMERICAN WAY" those words will be iconic for many years to come weather you like it or not. Dont get me wrong, I like Marvel alot and many of thier characters but OP asked who is better and im saying when it comes to the figure that will is without a doubt ICONIC youre gonna see SUPERMAN logos everywhere. Todays superheroes are cool in the sense they can teleport into walls, grow Claws outta thier hands, but NONE of them were ever created out the image of the every day AMERICAN... the ICON the world leader = SUPERMAN.. sorry but thats truth for ya so to answer your question
NO the Comic world, hero world WOULD not be the same if it wasnt for SUPERMAN, sure it would be around and toys, n movies would still be selling but not nearly as a huge if it wasnt any SUPERMAN..
Really? Superman was the only one to represent the American way? What was that guys name from Marvel...damn dude really looked colorful...Ithink back in the day they had him fight Hitler...oh that's right:
![]()
Part of dude's name is AMERICA.
Superman used during the great depression? Didn't the depression in America in in the early 30's while Supes was created in '38 or '39?
I give Superman his credit he was the first major face of Comic-Books, was he the greatest Hereo or character...no way. The absolute best character that DCcreated and has continually provided is Batman.