- 7,833
- 4,832
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2003
You take evrey chance you can to bash ESPN, huh?
I like to call em as I see em.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You take evrey chance you can to bash ESPN, huh?
I like to call em as I see em.
You take evrey chance you can to bash ESPN, huh?
I like to call em as I see em.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Newbs24
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
Well when you look at the ESPN prediction thread, and everyone except Sheridan says the Knicks basically have no chance when they are clearly prolly going to end up with him, how is it hard not getting frustrated?
Obviously, no one has had any real clue from the start and 95% of the *%!+ has been BS, but ESPN went extra hard to play the Knicks franchise...IT's all good though, we'll have the last laugh.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Newbs24
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
Well when you look at the ESPN prediction thread, and everyone except Sheridan says the Knicks basically have no chance when they are clearly prolly going to end up with him, how is it hard not getting frustrated?
Obviously, no one has had any real clue from the start and 95% of the *%!+ has been BS, but ESPN went extra hard to play the Knicks franchise...IT's all good though, we'll have the last laugh.
whats with all the Knicks hate from you?Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Newbs24
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
whats with all the Knicks hate from you?Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Newbs24
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
Originally Posted by Do Be Doo
bijald0331 wrote:
Newbs24 wrote:
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
Originally Posted by Do Be Doo
bijald0331 wrote:
Newbs24 wrote:
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
whats with all the Knicks hate from you?Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Do Be Doo
bijald0331 wrote:
Newbs24 wrote:
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
whats with all the Knicks hate from you?Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Do Be Doo
bijald0331 wrote:
Newbs24 wrote:
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
whats with all the Knicks hate from you?Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Do Be Doo
bijald0331 wrote:
Newbs24 wrote:
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
Stop going into the KNICKS THREAD if you don't if you don't like it.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
whats with all the Knicks hate from you?Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Do Be Doo
bijald0331 wrote:
Newbs24 wrote:
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
Stop going into the KNICKS THREAD if you don't if you don't like it.
Just because those things didnt happen doesnt mean they werent close to happening. You really dont get how things work.
It's called credibility.
FACT: Broussard reported that Phil Jackson had interest in coaching in Chicago. In response to this report, Phil Jackson says flat out, he had no interest in coaching Chicago next year whatsover.
When you report a story that has no merit, you lose credibility. As a journalist, that is all you have.
Don't try to belittle me when YOU don't understand how it works.
Just because those things didnt happen doesnt mean they werent close to happening. You really dont get how things work.
It's called credibility.
FACT: Broussard reported that Phil Jackson had interest in coaching in Chicago. In response to this report, Phil Jackson says flat out, he had no interest in coaching Chicago next year whatsover.
When you report a story that has no merit, you lose credibility. As a journalist, that is all you have.
Don't try to belittle me when YOU don't understand how it works.
Says the salty Bulls fanOriginally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
whats with all the Knicks hate from you?Originally Posted by bijald0331
Originally Posted by Do Be Doo
bijald0331 wrote:
Newbs24 wrote:
Nobody has done a good job. It has been a cluster }÷» from the word go. Bucher is the worst tho. He and Joe Schad know zero when it comes to the hot topic.
This is what I'm getting at. Only reason Chris Broussard gets his own is because Knicks fans believe negative reports only indicate bias while positive reports are good journalism. Look through the Knicks thread. It's hilarious. They get upset by bad reports yet praise these same journalists when they report positively. Just ignore the media or take it seriously and everyone would be better off.
Stop going into the KNICKS THREAD if you don't if you don't like it.
It's too funny for me to not read those pages. Like I said in that cliff, I respect their loyalty and how that thread is lively everyday. However, Some of their opinions are incredibly biased, like this thread.