- 18,083
- 8,618
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
Am I the only one that really likes the DMP version? Idk why but I love them a lot
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
2012 couldn't have been ashy because they were durabuck. Nubuck is the ashy stuff. Some of y'all will call anything ashy smh2012 model was solid as hell the go's had better color blocking but looked ashy Imo now y'all are tripping the 2015 hares were water especially with the NA on the insole and the FTLOTG olympic 7s held up better than my 2012s and 2004s easily
View media item 2482125View media item 2482126
I think it's because the contrast really makes the shoe look better imo. The 2012s and to some extent the 2002s just look too blandMy dmps are still going strong. They feel great. When I look down at them, takes me back to 92 for sure. My 2012 don't do that. Had the 02s years ago, they remind me of the 2012s.
yepI think it's because the contrast really makes the shoe look better imo. The 2012s and to some extent the 2002s just look too bland
Just got my 02 pair in, definitely prefer the two tone upper compared to the solid black 2012 version
I would go to google for a comparison. generally jordans 10+ years old are to be avoided unless collecting.I know its not the right thread exactly, but thought maybe I could get some info here regardless.
Im looking to start adding a few 7s to my collection.
Haven't owned a pair since I was in grade school.
So im a little unfamiliar with quality and craftsmanship on the retro releases.
First shoe I have been eyeing is the Olympics.
2004 vs 2012. Is the '04 wearable?
Is it closer to the OG also than the '12?
Any help would be appreciated
I would go to google for a comparison. generally jordans 10+ years old are to be avoided unless collecting.
Thanks. I did some research prior to the post.
Was hoping for someone who has both pairs to give a more personal opinion.
I know it's a long shot. Seems like the '12s is what I'll go with,
Just wasn't sure if the materials were trash.
I have a lot of 13s from the 04-05 time period that I can still wear.
Didn't know about the material makeup on the older 7s though.
2010-2015 before Bordeaux 7s were awful as far as shape. Wings were low and they looked weird. 2010 is when they ruined the shape of the 5s, 7s, and 9s. 7s have only slightly recoveredDude you're fine wearing 04 7s! The midsole son those tend to hold up just fine. Just make sure the shoes weren't like stored in the desert or something crazy. I would always recommend 2004 7s over 2012, you get more of that long forgotten original aj7 "cartoon" look where the wings are still sky high and the toe box is money. I still wear my 02 charcoals from time to time, granted I've had them since release day and have worn them regularly.
You won't believe this but I also have a 100% wearable pair of 1992 cardinal 7s. I have no idea how the previous owner stored them, but apparently his methods are perfect lol. Hope this helps man!
Dude you're fine wearing 04 7s! The midsole son those tend to hold up just fine. Just make sure the shoes weren't like stored in the desert or something crazy. I would always recommend 2004 7s over 2012, you get more of that long forgotten original aj7 "cartoon" look where the wings are still sky high and the toe box is money. I still wear my 02 charcoals from time to time, granted I've had them since release day and have worn them regularly.
You won't believe this but I also have a 100% wearable pair of 1992 cardinal 7s. I have no idea how the previous owner stored them, but apparently his methods are perfect lol. Hope this helps man!
Probably right. Dont really want to wait that long.These won't drop until 2022. 30 year anniversary.
The dmp had it. And everyone hated on it.Contrast upper really makes this shoe, can't stress it enough. That's why I don't like the 2012 pair.