- May 2, 2012
- 27,111
- 14,584
- Aug 27, 2014
- 3,995
- 4,930
gonna be alot of "down" whitegirls on that app best belieb
- Apr 21, 2007
- 7,815
- 14,264
- May 2, 2012
- 27,111
- 14,584
- May 2, 2012
- 27,111
- 14,584
- Jul 22, 2012
- 6,273
- 14,131
THIS! Repped both of you! I've learned to do this. Trying to have a discussion about what's really going in America with some of these Fox News watchers is pointless.
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,868
- 61,609
[h1]Unemployment rate for black Americans at 7-year low[/h1]
The unemployment rate for black Americans fell to single digits in April for the first time in nearly seven years. At the same time, the jobless rate among Asian-Americans rose for the first time in six months.
The black unemployment rate in April was 9.6 percent, the lowest level since June 2008. During the financial crisis and recession, the rate had risen as high as 16.8 percent.
Despite the latest improvement, the employment gap by race remains stubbornly wide. The jobless rate for blacks is more than twice that of whites.
Meanwhile, the Asian-American unemployment rate climbed to 4.4 percent from 3.2 percent in March. It was the first such increase since October.
The data for various demographic groups came from a survey of households that is part of the Labor Department's monthly jobs data.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/unemployment-rate-black-americans-7-164953019.html
The unemployment rate for black Americans fell to single digits in April for the first time in nearly seven years. At the same time, the jobless rate among Asian-Americans rose for the first time in six months.
The black unemployment rate in April was 9.6 percent, the lowest level since June 2008. During the financial crisis and recession, the rate had risen as high as 16.8 percent.
Despite the latest improvement, the employment gap by race remains stubbornly wide. The jobless rate for blacks is more than twice that of whites.
Meanwhile, the Asian-American unemployment rate climbed to 4.4 percent from 3.2 percent in March. It was the first such increase since October.
The data for various demographic groups came from a survey of households that is part of the Labor Department's monthly jobs data.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/unemployment-rate-black-americans-7-164953019.html
- Jun 21, 2005
- 9,997
- 11,459
While that's good news, its sad that it getting under 10% is an improvement.
- May 2, 2012
- 27,111
- 14,584
http://t.co/GVDA692W6tWhite supremacists arrested for terrorist plot in Florida. Not reported on CNN/Fox News
- May 2, 2012
- 27,111
- 14,584
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,868
- 61,609
^^ who does that tho?
blco02
Banned
- Apr 21, 2001
- 3,932
- 1,281
These unemployment numbers put out by the government are a joke. They don't count people who are working part time or have stopped looking for a job. By their definition, if you aren't actively looking for a job you aren't unemployed. This country has almost 93 million people not currently in the workforce, the highest percentage in 37 years.
- Dec 1, 2011
- 4,323
- 4,705
- Mar 31, 2005
- 5,712
- 1,019
And how did you get 93 million? From Right Wing websites... a stat from 2013 Fox News talking points... shaking my head
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-million-americans-not-working-or-looking-wo/
By Louis Jacobson on Tuesday, July 30th, 2013 at 4:03 p.m.
Our ruling
Bloggers and pundits have said that 90 million Americans either aren’t working or aren’t looking for work. That’s a real number, but it includes high schoolers, college students and retirement-age Americans, leaving perhaps 20 million a better approximation. We rate the claim Mostly False.
View media item 1530536
Last edited:
blco02
Banned
- Apr 21, 2001
- 3,932
- 1,281
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,408
- 44,321
- Mar 31, 2005
- 5,712
- 1,019
Did you not read the PolitiFACT link?
Who is not in the labor force?
As mentioned previously, the labor force is made up of the employed and the unemployed. The remainder—those who have no job and are not looking for one—are counted as not in the labor force. Many who are not in the labor force are going to school or are retired.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
Last edited:
blco02
Banned
- Apr 21, 2001
- 3,932
- 1,281
Did you not read the PolitiFACT link?
Who is not in the labor force?
As mentioned previously, the labor force is made up of the employed and the unemployed. The remainder—those who have no job and are not looking for one—are counted as not in the labor force. Many who are not in the labor force are going to school or are retired.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
A) Politifact is a well known left leaning site. They are a self proclaimed "fact-checking" site but you really shouldn't look to them for unbiased reporting.
B) Unemployed Americans, however you want to classify them and even if what you say is true, have increased from 80 million to 93 million in the past 6 years as you can see in the chart below taken from the BLS report. Unemployment is not down no matter what propaganda the government is putting out there. How can unemployment be down if less people are working? Don't believe everything the government tells you.
View media item 1530674
Last edited:
- Mar 31, 2005
- 5,712
- 1,019
This guy thinks 'Unemployment' is the same as 'Not in Labor Force' (The chart you posted)
So my 80 year old great grandmother whose obviously retired, and collecting social security = she's unemployed according to you!
My 16 year old nephew in high school who doesn't even have a driver's license = he's unemployed according to you!
Last edited:
blco02
Banned
- Apr 21, 2001
- 3,932
- 1,281
This guy thinks 'Unemployment' is the same as 'Not in Labor Force' (The chart you posted)
So my 80 year old great grandmother whose obviously retired, and collecting social security = she's unemployed according to you!
My 16 year old nephew in high school who doesn't even have a driver's license = he's unemployed according to you!
So the only reason those not in the labor force has risen 13 million in the past 6 years is because of the increase of 16 and 80 year olds?
Ok keep thinking that.
Last edited:
- May 4, 2014
- 144
- 85
You ever notice that white supremacist are usually fat and unattractive. just saying
- Mar 31, 2005
- 5,712
- 1,019
So the only reason those not in the labor force has risen 13 million in the past 6 years is because of the increase of 16 and 80 year olds?
Ok keep thinking that.
Yes due to retirees, students, and the disabled!
How old are you to not understand this? It even states it on the website.From 2000 - to 2008... it grew 11 million.. the explanation for that growth during the GW Bush era is the same answer as it is today.
Year
2000 69142 69120 69338 69267 69853 69876 70398 70401 70645 70782 70579 70488
2001 70088 70409 70381 70956 71414 71592 71526 72136 71676 71817 71876 72010
2002 72623 72010 72343 72281 72260 72600 72827 72856 72554 73026 73508 73675
2003 73960 74015 74295 74066 74268 73958 74767 75062 75249 75324 75280 75780
2004 75319 75648 75606 75907 75903 75735 75730 76113 76526 76399 76259 76581
2005 76808 76677 76846 76514 76409 76673 76721 76642 76739 76958 77138 77394
2006 77339 77122 77161 77318 77359 77317 77535 77451 77757 77634 77499 77376
2007 77506 77851 77982 78818 78810 78671 78904 79461 79047 79532 79105 79238
2008 78554 79156 79087 79429 79102 79314 79395 79466 79790 79736 80189 80380
2000 69142 69120 69338 69267 69853 69876 70398 70401 70645 70782 70579 70488
2001 70088 70409 70381 70956 71414 71592 71526 72136 71676 71817 71876 72010
2002 72623 72010 72343 72281 72260 72600 72827 72856 72554 73026 73508 73675
2003 73960 74015 74295 74066 74268 73958 74767 75062 75249 75324 75280 75780
2004 75319 75648 75606 75907 75903 75735 75730 76113 76526 76399 76259 76581
2005 76808 76677 76846 76514 76409 76673 76721 76642 76739 76958 77138 77394
2006 77339 77122 77161 77318 77359 77317 77535 77451 77757 77634 77499 77376
2007 77506 77851 77982 78818 78810 78671 78904 79461 79047 79532 79105 79238
2008 78554 79156 79087 79429 79102 79314 79395 79466 79790 79736 80189 80380
I am done explaining simple economics to you.
Here... educate yourself
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...6/the-incredible-shrinking-labor-force-again/
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,408
- 44,321
Bruh....yall don't see the elephant?
...I'm bout to hit that button..
...I'm bout to hit that button..
- Jun 21, 2005
- 9,997
- 11,459
Why are you in a black culture discussion when you're clearly A.) Not black and B.) Don't give a damn about the advancement of black culture?
Clowns.
Clowns.
blco02
Banned
- Apr 21, 2001
- 3,932
- 1,281
Yes due to retirees, students, and the disabled!
From 2000 - to 2008... it grew 11 million.. the explanation for that growth during the GW Bush era is the same answer as it is today.
Year
2000 69142 69120 69338 69267 69853 69876 70398 70401 70645 70782 70579 70488
2001 70088 70409 70381 70956 71414 71592 71526 72136 71676 71817 71876 72010
2002 72623 72010 72343 72281 72260 72600 72827 72856 72554 73026 73508 73675
2003 73960 74015 74295 74066 74268 73958 74767 75062 75249 75324 75280 75780
2004 75319 75648 75606 75907 75903 75735 75730 76113 76526 76399 76259 76581
2005 76808 76677 76846 76514 76409 76673 76721 76642 76739 76958 77138 77394
2006 77339 77122 77161 77318 77359 77317 77535 77451 77757 77634 77499 77376
2007 77506 77851 77982 78818 78810 78671 78904 79461 79047 79532 79105 79238
2008 78554 79156 79087 79429 79102 79314 79395 79466 79790 79736 80189 80380
I am done explaining simple economics to you.
Here... educate yourself
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...6/the-incredible-shrinking-labor-force-again/
No matter what you say, the economy sucks and everyone should know it by now. In 2007, median household income was $56, 436, today it's $54, 332.(source-census department). The unemployment rate is still way too high. But I've been told I'm not welcome in here because I'm not black so I'm out.
