- Jan 5, 2004
- 16,407
- 5,164
Ya but we all know the 2009-2012 were still the numbered shoe even though they used the year instead. I mean if they stopped the main Jordan shoe all together.
Exactly.....which is why 28's aren't the 24's and etc.
Yea yea but they still aren't the numbered tho. They brought back the actual numbers for a reason.
Yeah but AJ obviously sees the yearly Jordans as an extension of the numbers... If not, then the xx8 would have been the 24...
I don't disagree. I'm just saying they def took a "break" from the numbers but they do acknowledge the years series for whatever reasons.
Basically what I was trying to say and forgot to say was
... If/when those shoes are retroed down the line... I'd be suprised if they were not referred to as AJ 24-27...
