- 14,054
- 14,243
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
maybe a good idea?I probably need to try on my 33's to see what the complaints are
![Nerd :nerd: :nerd:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/nerd.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
maybe a good idea?I probably need to try on my 33's to see what the complaints are
Elephant print on the heel would've been a nice touch, or at least cement grey with no elephant print.
this is the sentiment every year and pretty much has been since the 15...
I mean, think about it. they gave us absolutely amazing, classic, innovative, timeless and groundbreaking designs for the 1st 14 YEARS STRAIGHT, which is more than pretty much any other footwear company can probably say. but it's been all downhill since then with the exception of the 20. so that's 20 years straight of mediocre, lackluster. so I don't know that we should be getting our Hope's up, expecting different when it comes to sig Js moving forward.
Speak for yourself.this is the sentiment every year and pretty much has been since the 15...
but it's been all downhill since then with the exception of the 20. so that's 20 years straight of mediocre, lackluster.
Man you old farts need to quit trashing anything/everything post 14s lol. Ya the 15s were weak, but then 16-18 were all great. The only shoes that are straight garbage are all the non numbered, I wish they would erase all history of those and pretend they didn’t exist. But then after that they’ve been back making pretty nice stuff IMO. I would put my 33s near the top of my list comfort wise, great arch support and super snug fit. They do feel a little different than most Airs on foot but I couldn’t be happier with them overall. Personally they’re my favorites since prolly the 21s.
You're definitely in the minority with that sentiment. Some were a miss but overall, most models after the 14 were successful. The 33's are no different. You just have to give them time to break in. The only two gripes I have about the shoe is I wish they would loosen up little more when you pull the eject cord and the difficulty in slipping them on. Neither of which would prevent me from wearing them or purchasing another pair in the right color way.this is the sentiment every year and pretty much has been since the 15...
I mean, think about it. they gave us absolutely amazing, classic, innovative, timeless and groundbreaking designs for the 1st 14 YEARS STRAIGHT, which is more than pretty much any other footwear company can probably say. but it's been all downhill since then with the exception of the 20. so that's 20 years straight of mediocre, lackluster. so I don't know that we should be getting our Hope's up, expecting different when it comes to sig Js moving forward.
So you saying the 23’s were trash that shoe was very unique in it on waythis is the sentiment every year and pretty much has been since the 15...
I mean, think about it. they gave us absolutely amazing, classic, innovative, timeless and groundbreaking designs for the 1st 14 YEARS STRAIGHT, which is more than pretty much any other footwear company can probably say. but it's been all downhill since then with the exception of the 20. so that's 20 years straight of mediocre, lackluster. so I don't know that we should be getting our Hope's up, expecting different when it comes to sig Js moving forward.
Y’all gonna put some respect on the 17s
I never played in either or had either. Just from a looks standpoint, the 17 I like--mostly the OG royal blue colorway and also the Carolina lows. Regret not ever buying them back then. As mentioned, the idea of $200 was insane. Plus, I hadn't come to terms with the main Air Jordan being white and blue LOL. But I'd welcome them now; they look like an Air Jordan to me all these years later. I don't remember why I never bought the lows.17's and 18's get consistently crapped on and I will never understand it. Both those shoes were incredible hoop shoes.
Weartesters just did a vid focusing on the 16.5 and other .5 Jordans.
I really like the 16 and 17, 18 is alright.
Y’all gonna put some respect on the 17s
17 was top 5 hoop shoe for me. I used em indoor an outdoor. Beast on both courts. Recently copped 2 pair of trophy room 16s. An got a pair of 17bulls on the way from goat. 17s my fave J period.17's and 18's get consistently crapped on and I will never understand it. Both those shoes were incredible hoop shoes.
Copped all blk 17s 2weeks after release day from world of footlocker for $100. Cause no1 want em. Every1 wanted bulls n wizards CWs back than. An anything al grey lol16,17,18
Was imo the era of JB making luxury basketball kicks that still had high-performance level tech no one at that I time as i remember it no other sig/brand could match that off/on the court look.
If you didn’t have the $200 to drop on the 17s back in ‘01-02 you could appreciate seeing them on someone elses feet. Cause everyone thought that msrp was outrageous. Today not so much cause “everybody is sneakerhead” now.
![]()