- 361
- 10
hope i don't get stabbed walking out the store with these lol its gonna be HOT where ever you decide to go haha.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by nflowshoe
Some one in the line might show up with this on
Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Honestly, the pic of the 95' OGs must be from a small sized shoe. the proportion looks like somethingOriginally Posted by sneakergameinsane
95
01
11
The patten leather is like a receding hairline...
smaller than a size US 9. I remember that MJ's XI looked rather like the 2011 in terms of shape.
From these 3 models, the 2000 retro looks the best.
Indeed the mid section of the 2011 shoe has less patent than the previous models.
Overall i don't know why some are already whining again. I'm glad they have the
bluetinted outsole and not the icy one like teh 2011 SpaceJams.
From what i can see, the black patent is black-based, so no more white lining at the edges,
while the 2000 retro had the white-based black patent leather like the OG concords and
OG black/reds.
Originally Posted by Kalon2000
yall dudes need to realize that things change. nike air is not coming back, and the factories, workers, and procedures have all changed.
what, do yall think that they have OG shoes of every shoe to copy off of? if they did, still nothing is ever perfectly replicated.
Originally Posted by El Bro
Originally Posted by Kalon2000
yall dudes need to realize that things change. nike air is not coming back, and the factories, workers, and procedures have all changed.
what, do yall think that they have OG shoes of every shoe to copy off of? if they did, still nothing is ever perfectly replicated.
I dont expect unnecessary changes from a company who charges 180 for a shoe. I expect, with todays technology, the top grossing shoe company in the world to be able to exactly replicate a 20 year old shoe, regardless if the factories have changed. With their resources, it doesnt take a fking genius to take an old shoe and have it exactly remade. Got Damn, take pride in your fking product. Its sad that greed has taken over the heart and soul of this company.
WOW, you have the OG XI black/redsOriginally Posted by JFMartiMcDandruff
Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Honestly, the pic of the 95' OGs must be from a small sized shoe. the proportion looks like somethingOriginally Posted by sneakergameinsane
95
01
11
The patten leather is like a receding hairline...
smaller than a size US 9. I remember that MJ's XI looked rather like the 2011 in terms of shape.
From these 3 models, the 2000 retro looks the best.
Indeed the mid section of the 2011 shoe has less patent than the previous models.
Overall i don't know why some are already whining again. I'm glad they have the
bluetinted outsole and not the icy one like teh 2011 SpaceJams.
From what i can see, the black patent is black-based, so no more white lining at the edges,
while the 2000 retro had the white-based black patent leather like the OG concords and
OG black/reds.
True, these are my size 8.5 Originals
I personally believe the recent Cool Grey retros were great...i was satisfied, mad i didn't get a pair.
The 2011 Concords in that photo looks like the 09 Space Jams which i hated...weird shape, and that dreaded patent cut
Edit: Those concord pics ain't real? Thank goodness...hope so
I couldn't agree more el bro, dude up there making pathetic excuses for this company is lame.Originally Posted by El Bro
Originally Posted by Kalon2000
yall dudes need to realize that things change. nike air is not coming back, and the factories, workers, and procedures have all changed.
what, do yall think that they have OG shoes of every shoe to copy off of? if they did, still nothing is ever perfectly replicated.
I dont expect unnecessary changes from a company who charges 180 for a shoe. I expect, with todays technology, the top grossing shoe company in the world to be able to exactly replicate a 20 year old shoe, regardless if the factories have changed. With their resources, it doesnt take a fking genius to take an old shoe and have it exactly remade. Got Damn, take pride in your fking product. Its sad that greed has taken over the heart and soul of this company.
EuGeNiLe GTS wrote:
damn, if they look like the ones posted on VM, those look weak....
but guess what, people still buying, and so will i. hate to say it, even with price hikes and crap quality we still going to buy it.
for those who say they won't, all good, just gives the endless amount of those who want it a chance.
i have the 01s, had the ogs they were beat to crap, not so much hype for me, but a lot of significance in my fav shoe, era player, team, etc.
BAY AREA folks who are lining up, just hope your not in the same line that the SHOE PALACE DOOD and his crew go to. you hear stories about what he does on hype/big releases.
Don't line up at the Hilltop shoe palace. The SP dude is the manager there. Im sure he'll have 2 pairs for sale come release day.
Yes as do I those OG Breds are fresh manOriginally Posted by jumpman cbt2
WOW, you have the OG XI black/redsOriginally Posted by JFMartiMcDandruff
Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Honestly, the pic of the 95' OGs must be from a small sized shoe. the proportion looks like something
smaller than a size US 9. I remember that MJ's XI looked rather like the 2011 in terms of shape.
From these 3 models, the 2000 retro looks the best.
Indeed the mid section of the 2011 shoe has less patent than the previous models.
Overall i don't know why some are already whining again. I'm glad they have the
bluetinted outsole and not the icy one like teh 2011 SpaceJams.
From what i can see, the black patent is black-based, so no more white lining at the edges,
while the 2000 retro had the white-based black patent leather like the OG concords and
OG black/reds.
True, these are my size 8.5 Originals
I personally believe the recent Cool Grey retros were great...i was satisfied, mad i didn't get a pair.
The 2011 Concords in that photo looks like the 09 Space Jams which i hated...weird shape, and that dreaded patent cut
Edit: Those concord pics ain't real? Thank goodness...hope soI only had the 2001 retros and i sold my pair because the patent at the toe area was cut much
shorter than all my other XI retros, having an very ugly crease on one side and the outsole with the varsity red looked too dark compared
to the vibrant True red from the OGs. Envy you ^^
better comparisonOriginally Posted by nflowshoe
I would express my feelings but dont want to the JB loyalist to jump down my throat............
the 2011 Concord Retro remains pretty faithful to the original with the addition of the Blue tinted icy outsole.
MaZe out of all people said this? blasphemy
Originally Posted by NobleKane
Originally Posted by Jewelzm3
I couldn't agree more el bro, dude up there making pathetic excuses for this company is lame.Originally Posted by El Bro
I dont expect unnecessary changes from a company who charges 180 for a shoe. I expect, with todays technology, the top grossing shoe company in the world to be able to exactly replicate a 20 year old shoe, regardless if the factories have changed. With their resources, it doesnt take a fking genius to take an old shoe and have it exactly remade. Got Damn, take pride in your fking product. Its sad that greed has taken over the heart and soul of this company.
qft
Originally Posted by jordanize84
Perhaps whether or not you know this, those VMV inc photos of the Concords were actually photoshoped. But they look pretty good though. The actual images are on Counterkicks.com but they're just teasers of the shoes. Parts of the soles taken.