- 4,830
- 5,939
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2002
Another comparison pic for those of you who are interested...FTL CG's and AR Concords...
Air Jordan XI Retro - White/Concord/Black - CONFIRMED - Holiday 2011
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by blondsoccerplyr,
- Start date
- 161
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
Can't verify on the Cards, but the flint xiii's I'm wearing have production dates of 6/10/10 - 7/27/10 and they came from ndc..
Don't think a short production date is necessarily a sign of fakes..
- 470
- 16
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2004
Can we have better pics of the carbon fiber?
- 602
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
these shoes look pretty good to me.. aint no major problem at all..
- 3,302
- 422
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
Your pair looks really good Dc30. Others not so much.
- 533
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
So here are the obvious differences I see so far from those who got their pairs. It's either a have or have not with the following. A checklist of sorts might help going forward.
Milky Toe
Clear Toe
Insole with blue stiching , no stamp, hole
Insole with white stiching, stamp, hole.
Im not including PL cut, cus weve seen so many variations of it, its hard to pinpoint what is right.
Please feel free to add...
Milky Toe
Clear Toe
Insole with blue stiching , no stamp, hole
Insole with white stiching, stamp, hole.
Im not including PL cut, cus weve seen so many variations of it, its hard to pinpoint what is right.
Please feel free to add...
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
Randy-clear cap (617)
Randy-clear cap (DC30)
Promo-Shoes--cloudy cap (oso23)
WHO DO WE BELIEVE!!!!!!
Randy-clear cap (DC30)
Promo-Shoes--cloudy cap (oso23)
WHO DO WE BELIEVE!!!!!!
- 533
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
Looks like all 3 have air units in them as well.
- 161
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
is that pair from AR already yellowing?
- 4,830
- 5,939
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2002
Is this ok?
- 4,812
- 640
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
^ yea and that Carbon Fiber sure does look off
- 470
- 16
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2004
^Is it just me or the carbon fiber looks different from what NoobLee posted a while back?
- 937
- 191
- Joined
- May 15, 2011
Just got caught up, man this thing's moving fast! got a couple thoughts:
1) The space jam "remake" is basically a large scale version of what everybody was doing in '95. taking concords and making them into space jams lol
2) You guys got alot of hate for Zyzz! The dude had a good experience with SDS, and he's just speaking his mind. Remember, he was the one who broke the news that the space jams were a remake and not from '09. He's not on Jay's **** or whatever.
3) I wouldn't be surprised if Nike decided to flip the right jumpman backwards also, to differentiate the retail version from these early production models.
if that happened, everybody who copped from air randy and sds would be rocking their pairs with jeans only haha
4) I went on SDS this morning and everything on there pertaining to space jams has mysteriously dissapeared. Strange. Maybe the dude is honest and didn't want to sell fakes. Yesterday it said he still had 35 pais, and with all the controversy I highly doubt he moved all those overnight.
And lastly, most of these concords people are getting look like $&@*! Low patent, wrikled ankle, weird $@! jumpman not a good look. I've seen a couple decent looking pairs from air randy, hope the sds and retail pairs are better.
1) The space jam "remake" is basically a large scale version of what everybody was doing in '95. taking concords and making them into space jams lol
2) You guys got alot of hate for Zyzz! The dude had a good experience with SDS, and he's just speaking his mind. Remember, he was the one who broke the news that the space jams were a remake and not from '09. He's not on Jay's **** or whatever.
3) I wouldn't be surprised if Nike decided to flip the right jumpman backwards also, to differentiate the retail version from these early production models.
if that happened, everybody who copped from air randy and sds would be rocking their pairs with jeans only haha
4) I went on SDS this morning and everything on there pertaining to space jams has mysteriously dissapeared. Strange. Maybe the dude is honest and didn't want to sell fakes. Yesterday it said he still had 35 pais, and with all the controversy I highly doubt he moved all those overnight.
And lastly, most of these concords people are getting look like $&@*! Low patent, wrikled ankle, weird $@! jumpman not a good look. I've seen a couple decent looking pairs from air randy, hope the sds and retail pairs are better.
- 4,830
- 5,939
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2002
In the picture it does, but in person it looks similar. This is my cell phone camera...as of now I don't have anything better to shoot pics with...but I'll try and get a better look.
- 1,056
- 219
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2000
Yup, all 3 do have the air unit indentations for sure which is great news..... proves they are using OEM Nike parts, Randys pairs look better than anticipated which is good news for everyone who ordered from him. I hope everyone is happy with their pairs.
zyzz can you get a update from sds for me on order 488, cant get a response to multiple tweets or emails thx
Nike reversing the jumpman on the left shoe the past few years is the dumbest design decision I have ever seen. It completely throws off the flow of the shoe
- 4,812
- 640
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
It looks different from carbon fiber JB leaked which is the only photo they have shown of the sneaker
- 504
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2005
Where's noob at???? We need to know wich are real and which are fake?
- 7,138
- 6,238
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2007
BigLescobar wrote:
Nike reversing the jumpman on the left shoe the past few years is the dumbest design decision I have ever seen. It completely throws off the flow of the shoe
I know exactly what you mean!!
- 444
- 41
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
Originally Posted by 617jordanhead
My pair from AR
Either its your phone or these look suspect to me. the 23 on the back looks like it was stickied . One jumpman is higher than the other, and the Patent leather just looks cheap In my honest opinion.
- 5,525
- 1,140
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
Originally Posted by teamfreshh
at that left jumpan
<a href="http://http://www.gifbin.com/982779"><img src="http://www.gifbin.com/bin/042009/1239883733_Angry_Video_Game_Nerd.gif" alt="funny gifs" /></a>
- 69
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2001
Not sure if it's the angle (doesn't look like it), but on the left shoe (right one in the picture) the toe cap is way off center.Originally Posted by 617jordanhead
My pair from AR
- 4,830
- 5,939
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2002
Better?
- 682
- 28
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2005
Yea the shoes are not great quality at all I will never buy early release shoes again
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
Originally Posted by bOba BaLLa
Not sure if it's the angle (doesn't look like it), but on the left shoe (right one in the picture) the toe cap is way off center.Originally Posted by 617jordanhead
My pair from AR
DAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMB !!!!!!!!!!
- 533
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
Originally Posted by bOba BaLLa
Not sure if it's the angle (doesn't look like it), but on the left shoe (right one in the picture) the toe cap is way off center.Originally Posted by 617jordanhead
My pair from AR
thats a good observation... that does look waaaay off.
