- Jul 27, 2012
- 648
- 456
Need i say more?
Air Jordan V 5 Retro Fire Red "Black Tongue" 8/31
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by locobans,
- Start date
- Jun 23, 2009
- 42,908
- 43,487
06 and 13 comparison
- Dec 23, 2003
- 18,412
- 5,848
besides the blue tint i don't see a difference from the 2006 to the 2013 pair
- Jun 23, 2009
- 42,908
- 43,487
Really?The netting,the tongue height,and the jumpman on the back and tongue.
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,087
- 8,629
Don't forget about the red. The 13 version has a varsity red look while the 06 has the fire red look. The netting on the 13s is smaller than the 06 and the 13 is a bit higher than the 06
quise2024
Banned
- Feb 16, 2013
- 20,741
- 4,690
tongue height, blue tint, 23 sits higher, jumpman on back, jumpman on tongue, shades of red, jordan tag height on tongue, netting, & the padding area on the ankle of the '13 pair looks bigger/lower
still getting a pair though, missed out on the '06
Last edited:
- May 24, 2013
- 392
- 131
post these pics here a couple years ago and you'd swear this was authentic vs replica comparison.06 and 13 comparison
- Apr 4, 2004
- 4,515
- 1,300
Geez ^^ 
- Feb 22, 2013
- 5,858
- 9,404
- Jul 25, 2012
- 164
- 108
^^^ It's all good in the hood.
- Mar 11, 2013
- 11,177
- 1,537
- May 15, 2003
- 56,736
- 65,811
Glad I have the 06's, but I'll get these also
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,087
- 8,629
They are minor changes but I do like the smaller netting. Even though I don't mind yellowing i like having a fresh pair of jordans without yellowing
quise2024
Banned
- Feb 16, 2013
- 20,741
- 4,690
The changes honestly arent even substantial enough to notice especially not on foot. given the time u have to look at the pictures and compare then yes the changes are noticeable but the only thing that sticks out is the blue tint of the sole.
For the worse ... no
For the better ... no
- Dec 23, 2003
- 18,412
- 5,848
i dont see a difference
these little differences don't warrant a second pair unless i can get one at retail without putting in work
Last edited:
- Jan 3, 2009
- 13,331
- 11,579
Yeah those are just little differences, definitely not a big deal in my book. I can't wait to get my hands on these. I never owned this CW before.
- May 9, 2013
- 3,410
- 938
i need two of dese. one to rock da S out of dem, and da other to stock for some time den rock da living S out of dem too.
- Jan 15, 2013
- 4,044
- 2,856
Not because i already have them, but I think the 06's look better.
- Feb 17, 2010
- 11,459
- 15,619
- Feb 17, 2010
- 11,459
- 15,619
The 06 look better because those had more of a bulk compared to these but the leather on the 06 was terrible
2 of these and 2 of the playoff 8's plus 1 fire red 4's for my summer line up. Damn so much red coming out....
But I need them!!!
View media item 440208
Last edited:
- May 15, 2003
- 56,736
- 65,811
I think the 06's are definitely better.
IMO they aren't that big, but they are noticeable. Mainly the toe box, the shape and the floating 23.
- Apr 17, 2013
- 41
- 12
Lmao!! "This the 5 o'clock free 5's give away"
- Apr 17, 2013
- 41
- 12
Lmao!! "This the 5 o'clock free 5's give away"
- Jun 14, 2003
- 4,292
- 4,638
the 23 on the '13 is do damn crooked 
