bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,582
- 21,771
but the fire red 3s didn't sit tho.... there was just a ton to go around.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have seen the Fire Red III's. My brother has them in his room and I'm convincing him to return them.
While we can say a particular release may be better than another in terms of the defects or quality issues it has, the aesthetics will always remain virtually the same. Fire Red III's from 2013 are almost identical to previous retro (I know about the elephant print).
I also don't care much for whether a colorway is original or not, or who wore it, or what shot was hit in it. I'm judging the shoe strictly off how it looks.
So for me: WC III's > BCIII's > True Blues > Green Glow IV's >>> Fire Red III's. It seems like the masses agree with me, since I've still seen Fire Red III's in store, but the same can't be said for the Green Glows.
but the fire red 3s didn't sit tho.... there was just a ton to go around.
It's a case of the ignorant choosing to stay in the dark & remain ignorantbut the fire red 3s didn't sit tho.... there was just a ton to go around.
No matter how many times we say this (over several releases), they just don't get it.
when i look at my white 3s i think of some people in the 80s playin tennis... It looks really datedBred 11/Toro 4 was produced more... Those didn't sit like the FR3s. FR3 was sitting in almost every store with FSR later on the day.
Bred 11/Toro 4 was produced more... Those didn't sit like the FR3s. FR3 was sitting in almost every store with FSR later on the day.
Bred 11/Toro 4 was produced more... Those didn't sit like the FR3s. FR3 was sitting in almost every store with FSR later on the day.
i disagree and thats what so good about it everyone is differentCrimson and Joker III's are absolutely awful and terrible.
selling 300K in a week isn't sitting bruh.... not sure how you can rationalize what you are saying.
selling 300K in a week isn't sitting bruh.... not sure how you can rationalize what you are saying.
selling 300K in a week isn't sitting bruh.... not sure how you can rationalize what you are saying.
Yea in a week... I was referring to pairs sitting later on the actual release date. I walked in to about 4-5 shoe spots in NYC later on that day. All of them had FSR sitting. All of them said it was low key hype release. I came back to the bay 2-3 days later and some stores still had sizes sitting. I understand all Retros sells out eventually no matter of the hype.
So if Jordan would have worn the Green Glows in 1989, you would have loved them?The masses don't agree with you. They clearly produced more FR3's than the did GG4's. So your "since they sold out faster" argument means absolutely nothing.
"I also don't care much for whether a colorway is original or not, or who wore it, or what shot was hit in it. I'm judging the shoe strictly off how it looks."
This is exactly what's wrong with the sneaker culture today. Kids like you don't give a **** about the brand or the history of the shoe... They just wanna buy it because it "looks cool" and it's in style.
SMH
can I ask why are we so concerned about what shoes sat for how long, or which sold more pairs, etc ... unless you are the one collecting revenue off these shoes then who the F... cares. I feel like some of you try to justify your reasoning for buying a certain pair based off how well it sells, as well as trying to convince others of why they should or shouldnt have bought xxx pair
If it sold out in minutes-hours = excellent buy (people will want these at some point, hopefully)
If it sold out in a day = great buy (i think i did good since they were none left from what i hear on NT)
Took the weekend to sell out = maybe i could have passed
Sat for the weekend and into the week then sold out = should have passed
Didnt sell out at all = wtf was i thinking, return these, and s*** talk them
lol i was thinking the same thing.So if Jordan would have worn the Green Glows in 1989, you would have loved them?
YUP. I guarantee the FR3 will be the best seller #s wise this month. They made a ton, and plenty for everyone. great release imo.but the fire red 3s didn't sit tho.... there was just a ton to go around.
Where are y'all getting numbers from?Bred 11/Toro 4 was produced more... Those didn't sit like the FR3s. FR3 was sitting in almost every store with FSR later on the day.
selling 300K in a week isn't sitting bruh.... not sure how you can rationalize what you are saying.
So if Jordan would have worn the Green Glows in 1989, you would have loved them?
can I ask why are we so concerned about what shoes sat for how long, or which sold more pairs, etc ... unless you are the one collecting revenue off these shoes then who the F... cares. I feel like some of you try to justify your reasoning for buying a certain pair based off how well it sells, as well as trying to convince others of why they should or shouldnt have bought xxx pair
If it sold out in minutes-hours = excellent buy (people will want these at some point, hopefully)
If it sold out in a day = great buy (i think i did good since they were none left from what i hear on NT)
Took the weekend to sell out = maybe i could have passed
Sat for the weekend and into the week then sold out = should have passed
Didnt sell out at all = wtf was i thinking, return these, and s*** talk them
they released 4 days ago ..............Any word on a restock I wanna get the green glows pretty bad