- Dec 29, 2003
- 10,122
- 35,376
These are a sample from 6 years ago. They won't look like this.
These look so cheap with leather.
Air Jordan 5 OG “Black Metallic” Reimagined 2025 !
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Jordanbball,
- Start date
These are a sample from 6 years ago. They won't look like this.
These look so cheap with leather.
- May 15, 2003
- 56,982
- 66,422
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,411
- 11,454
Transferred damn fine on the binsThose aren’t bad but just no please. There’s a reason why they weren’t originally released that way imo
- Aug 3, 2013
- 2,223
- 3,614
trappedintime
that’s a loose adaptation that took inspiration from how MJ wore his 5s on the court though, not a 1:1 reimagined version with leather. . . It did translate well but to me, the BIN shoe is in its own lane. No leather dammit!
- Apr 18, 2024
- 2,142
- 3,388
Im still lightweight mad they made the breds leather man smh. Thats a top 3 Jordan all time for me. I pray they dont do this to the 5's. God no. Black leather is just too shiny of a material
- Dec 29, 2003
- 10,122
- 35,376
- Mar 18, 2019
- 586
- 1,473
- Apr 11, 2019
- 872
- 1,308
I WISH the Reimagine was just a "23" added.
- Jul 21, 2020
- 254
- 453
Air Jordan 5 “Black Metallic Reimagined” Releases February 2025
Air Jordan 5 Black Metallic Reimagined HF3975-001 Release Date: February 15, 2025 Color: Black/White-Metallic Silver-Fire Red Price: $210 USD
sneakerbardetroit.com
I’m still in for a double up at this point, all-star weekend here we come baby
- Apr 18, 2024
- 2,142
- 3,388
they fix the toe box and the tongue then it’s a double. If it’s just the 2016’s again then I still need one pair regardless. Classics
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- Apr 11, 2008
- 61,868
- 23,650
In for a pair!
- Aug 21, 2010
- 11,352
- 17,571
The tongue was one of the reasons I sold my White/Fire Red. Hope they take it down a notch.
- Jan 2, 2010
- 83,339
- 119,509
- Dec 29, 2003
- 10,122
- 35,376
The reason, Nike puts OG on their boxes these days.
- Jul 26, 2014
- 688
- 1,225
delete
- Jul 11, 2024
- 67
- 131
These definitely need 23 on the side. That’s the main reason I so my 2016 pair.
- Jul 26, 2014
- 979
- 875
The exact reason I covet my 2011 pair.
- Aug 3, 2013
- 2,223
- 3,614
Man that pair stinks. That’s gotta be the worst retro of these ever lol
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- Nov 17, 2014
- 13,562
- 9,658
With the reflective stitching; I just hope the tongue is reflective as well!
- Jul 14, 2003
- 7,863
- 4,913
8 year mark for the 2016 release today (7/23)
Mine still DS but really can't believe the how the ice is holding up, hope the new versions keep this
Mine still DS but really can't believe the how the ice is holding up, hope the new versions keep this
- Aug 3, 2013
- 2,223
- 3,614
I just wore my 2016s a couple days ago. I love those and I just hope they don’t deviate too far from the OG pair in 2025 because I would really like to pick up a fresh pair.
- Feb 15, 2008
- 5,022
- 1,027
Team “No 23” on the heel over here
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- Nov 11, 2002
- 6,840
- 13,870
I didn’t even realize it was the anniversary but I wore mine today as well.
My netting is starting to break…
My netting is starting to break…
s dubl
Supporter
- Dec 3, 2006
- 30,092
- 30,469
Bruh… my 99 fire reds barely started to crumble a few years back…. Netting and soles still semi-clear. 2016s already falling apart?! Wild.
