- Jul 6, 2008
- 9,063
- 57
my head hurts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]"even when we can't add the[/color]Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
You applied it the wrong way.
Because i don't have a parenthetical symbol around 18 and 6. Read the bolded red above.
When you apply the distributive property, after the fact, the parenthesis vanishes because there's no need for them anymore. You've distributed into the function so what's the purpose of still having them.
Point is, using the Dis.property yields 2 different answers:
2 if you keep the parenthesis (which you are not supposed to, anyway)
and
8.666 if you lose the parenthesis.
The fact that you have 2 different answers using the same process is evidence that the process is FLAWED.
...Code:terms inside them."
Code:Code:But you can and you should have before multiplying them by 2
Code:
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]"even when we can't add the[/color]Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
You applied it the wrong way.
Because i don't have a parenthetical symbol around 18 and 6. Read the bolded red above.
When you apply the distributive property, after the fact, the parenthesis vanishes because there's no need for them anymore. You've distributed into the function so what's the purpose of still having them.
Point is, using the Dis.property yields 2 different answers:
2 if you keep the parenthesis (which you are not supposed to, anyway)
and
8.666 if you lose the parenthesis.
The fact that you have 2 different answers using the same process is evidence that the process is FLAWED.
...Code:terms inside them."
Code:Code:But you can and you should have before multiplying them by 2
Code:
Originally Posted by Carver
This dude went and sig thatOriginally Posted by snakeyes17
Juxtaposition isn't a definite reasoning however...
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]TEAM[/color][color= rgb(0, 0, 255)]288[/color]
Originally Posted by Carver
This dude went and sig thatOriginally Posted by snakeyes17
Juxtaposition isn't a definite reasoning however...
[color= rgb(255, 0, 0)]TEAM[/color][color= rgb(0, 0, 255)]288[/color]
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]"even when we can't add the[/color]Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Because i don't have a parenthetical symbol around 18 and 6. Read the bolded red above.
When you apply the distributive property, after the fact, the parenthesis vanishes because there's no need for them anymore. You've distributed into the function so what's the purpose of still having them.
Point is, using the Dis.property yields 2 different answers:
2 if you keep the parenthesis (which you are not supposed to, anyway)
and
8.666 if you lose the parenthesis.
The fact that you have 2 different answers using the same process is evidence that the process is FLAWED.
...Code:terms inside them."
Code:Code:But you can and you should have before multiplying them by 2
Code:
Wow...
I guess y'all the "baby-steps" type....
Ok here goes:
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) = 48 ÷2(12)
2 (12) = 2 x 12
therefore
48 ÷2(12) = 48 ÷2 x 12.
Because the multiplication and division sign have the same precedence and/or are of equal rank, you just solve the equation from left to right:
48/2 = 24 x 12 = 288.
This is the correct answer.
Now using the DISTR. property, you get:
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) =
48 ÷ (2x 9) + (2x3) =
48 ÷ 18 + 6
Applying PEMDAS results in: 48/18 = 2.666 + 6 = 8.6666.
OR
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) =
48 ÷ (18+6) =
48/24 = 2
See here we have two different answers when you use the distr.property and that why it's the wrong way to go. You can't just choose to accept the answer you agree with and disregard the one you don't agree with even though you're using the same process.
Y'all problem is the fact that y'all not even using the distributive property correctly. After distributing, the parenthesis vanishes. You don't keep it. It doesn't stay.
How y'all arguing for a property and don't even know the governing dynamics......
In either case, whatever answer you get is still WRONG as the correct answer is 288.
...
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]"even when we can't add the[/color]Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Because i don't have a parenthetical symbol around 18 and 6. Read the bolded red above.
When you apply the distributive property, after the fact, the parenthesis vanishes because there's no need for them anymore. You've distributed into the function so what's the purpose of still having them.
Point is, using the Dis.property yields 2 different answers:
2 if you keep the parenthesis (which you are not supposed to, anyway)
and
8.666 if you lose the parenthesis.
The fact that you have 2 different answers using the same process is evidence that the process is FLAWED.
...Code:terms inside them."
Code:Code:But you can and you should have before multiplying them by 2
Code:
Wow...
I guess y'all the "baby-steps" type....
Ok here goes:
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) = 48 ÷2(12)
2 (12) = 2 x 12
therefore
48 ÷2(12) = 48 ÷2 x 12.
Because the multiplication and division sign have the same precedence and/or are of equal rank, you just solve the equation from left to right:
48/2 = 24 x 12 = 288.
This is the correct answer.
Now using the DISTR. property, you get:
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) =
48 ÷ (2x 9) + (2x3) =
48 ÷ 18 + 6
Applying PEMDAS results in: 48/18 = 2.666 + 6 = 8.6666.
OR
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) =
48 ÷ (18+6) =
48/24 = 2
See here we have two different answers when you use the distr.property and that why it's the wrong way to go. You can't just choose to accept the answer you agree with and disregard the one you don't agree with even though you're using the same process.
Y'all problem is the fact that y'all not even using the distributive property correctly. After distributing, the parenthesis vanishes. You don't keep it. It doesn't stay.
How y'all arguing for a property and don't even know the governing dynamics......
In either case, whatever answer you get is still WRONG as the correct answer is 288.
...
Originally Posted by pacmagic2002
Is this what people are trying to say when they say its 2???
Originally Posted by pacmagic2002
Is this what people are trying to say when they say its 2???
Originally Posted by Rocky437
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
2
The brackets dont disappear. You have to do the 2*12 first.
Originally Posted by Rocky437
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
2
The brackets dont disappear. You have to do the 2*12 first.
Originally Posted by Rocky437
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
2
The brackets dont disappear. You have to do the 2*12 first.
Originally Posted by Rocky437
48÷2(9+3)
48÷2(12)
48÷24
2
The brackets dont disappear. You have to do the 2*12 first.
Originally Posted by do work son
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]"even when we can't add the[/color]Code:terms inside them."
Code:Code:But you can and you should have before multiplying them by 2
Code:
Wow...
I guess y'all the "baby-steps" type....
Ok here goes:
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) = 48 ÷2(12)
2 (12) = 2 x 12
therefore
48 ÷2(12) = 48 ÷2 x 12.
Because the multiplication and division sign have the same precedence and/or are of equal rank, you just solve the equation from left to right:
48/2 = 24 x 12 = 288.
This is the correct answer.
Now using the DISTR. property, you get:
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) =
48 ÷ (2x 9) + (2x3) =
48 ÷ 18 + 6
Applying PEMDAS results in: 48/18 = 2.666 + 6 = 8.6666.
OR
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) =
48 ÷ (18+6) =
48/24 = 2
See here we have two different answers when you use the distr.property and that why it's the wrong way to go. You can't just choose to accept the answer you agree with and disregard the one you don't agree with even though you're using the same process.
Y'all problem is the fact that y'all not even using the distributive property correctly. After distributing, the parenthesis vanishes. You don't keep it. It doesn't stay.
How y'all arguing for a property and don't even know the governing dynamics......
In either case, whatever answer you get is still WRONG as the correct answer is 288.
...
it only vanishes after you have collected the like terms that derive from that distribution. it isnt 48/ 18 + 6, its 48/ (18+6)
From another site:
Code:And so the DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY allows us to at leasteliminate the parentheses
...
...
Originally Posted by do work son
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Originally Posted by kingcrux31
[color= rgb(255, 255, 255)]"even when we can't add the[/color]Code:terms inside them."
Code:Code:But you can and you should have before multiplying them by 2
Code:
Wow...
I guess y'all the "baby-steps" type....
Ok here goes:
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) = 48 ÷2(12)
2 (12) = 2 x 12
therefore
48 ÷2(12) = 48 ÷2 x 12.
Because the multiplication and division sign have the same precedence and/or are of equal rank, you just solve the equation from left to right:
48/2 = 24 x 12 = 288.
This is the correct answer.
Now using the DISTR. property, you get:
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) =
48 ÷ (2x 9) + (2x3) =
48 ÷ 18 + 6
Applying PEMDAS results in: 48/18 = 2.666 + 6 = 8.6666.
OR
48 ÷ 2 (9+3) =
48 ÷ (18+6) =
48/24 = 2
See here we have two different answers when you use the distr.property and that why it's the wrong way to go. You can't just choose to accept the answer you agree with and disregard the one you don't agree with even though you're using the same process.
Y'all problem is the fact that y'all not even using the distributive property correctly. After distributing, the parenthesis vanishes. You don't keep it. It doesn't stay.
How y'all arguing for a property and don't even know the governing dynamics......
In either case, whatever answer you get is still WRONG as the correct answer is 288.
...
it only vanishes after you have collected the like terms that derive from that distribution. it isnt 48/ 18 + 6, its 48/ (18+6)
From another site:
Code:And so the DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY allows us to at leasteliminate the parentheses
...
...