.

After watching Knicks in 60, it looks like we will be loads better defensively. I can foresee a scrappy, get after the ball type of team, but not necessarily alock down defense. That might be all we would need for the moment to take the next step.

However, I will not, cannot, get excited for an upcoming season until something actually happens. I've been down that road too many times. I know no onewas expecting anything from teams past, but the fan in you gets all giddy about the positives, and then those "teams" go out there squash all thatgiddiness to pulp.
 
Originally Posted by Al3xis

SF- Jeffries
PF- Al
just not sure where this comes from?
idk if im not miistaken i always saw Jeffries more of a natural 3 with his versatility and ability to guard positions from 1-4 effectively andbecause he is rarelyy in the post on offense, and i have always seen Al as a 3/4 but more of a natural 4
 
1. i'm loving toney douglas' game and all but i think jeff teague was the steal of the draft
2. i'm still not over us drafting jordan hill (yes i know season hasnt even started, but i still think derozan would have been amazing here)
3. rotation is set with duhon, chandler, al, jeffries, lee (starting 5) and nate, gallo, darko, toney
4. btw i read somewhere that we're projected to start the season 2-8 in our first 10 games
grin.gif
 
well, not sayin youre wrong, i just think D'Antoni has always penciled in jeffries as one of the bigs.

and al has a little more ability, (ballhandling specifically) on the wing.
 
It really doesn't matter if Jeffries or Al is the 3 or 4, in this system its interchangeable. We switch on screens like 80% of the time anyway because wehave a versatile athletic lineup.

All we need is Jeffries to keep playing at this level and some team running for a championship will try to trade for him. As for Curry, I heard he is bannedfrom team practices and workouts until he loses more weight. He can't get up and down the court without getting injured
indifferent.gif
. I don't see anyone everwanting to trade for Curry so we will probably have to ride out his contract.

This dude Hughes was in the lineup last night in crunch time with the rookies and nbdl players and still got outplayed
laugh.gif
. I think hes like 1-23 from thefield in preseason and you can tell when you watch him he is playing lazy.
 
Waived Hunter and Crawford.

So I guess LAndry has a spot?

happy he made it out of those guys, but cant tell me he's better or brings anything different than Pat JR would have *shrugs*
 
Originally Posted by Al3xis

happy he made it out of those guys, but cant tell me he's better or brings anything different than Pat JR would have *shrugs*
 
This is our next 10 game schedule

Upcoming Games
OctoberOpponentTimeLocal TVNat TVRadio
Wed 28 @ Miami 7:30pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
Fri 30 @ Charlotte 7:00pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
Sat 31 vs Philadelphia 7:30pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
NovemberOpponentTimeLocal TVNat TVRadio
Mon 02 vs New Orleans 7:30pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
Wed 04 vs Indiana 7:30pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
Fri 06 vs Cleveland 8:00pm MSG
broadcast_ESPN.gif
1050 ESPN Radio
Sat 07 @ Milwaukee 8:30pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
Mon 09 vs Utah 7:30pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
Wed 11 vs Atlanta 7:30pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
Fri 13 vs Golden State 7:30pm MSG 1050 ESPN Radio
I see us going 4-6 in our first 10 games.


Opponent
@ Miami W
@ Charlotte W
vs Philadelphia L
Opponent
vs New Orleans L
vs Indiana W
vs Cleveland L
@ Milwaukee W
vs Utah L
vs Atlanta L
vs Golden State L
 
it's a favorable start with 7 outa 10 at home. I'd say 5 or 6 wins
 
I'm not trying to sound like a bandwagon fan or something but the Knicks are now my default NBA squad cause of this man

j76sld.jpg


I hope he gets a decent amount of minutes.
 
5 wins seems reasonable, although its not good...
the thing is, i like darkos presence on court.
looking at the lineup of duhon, will, jefferies, al, and lee, we'll get dominated by bigger teams, or any team with a legit center.
imo, lineup of duhon-chandler-jefferies-lee-darko seems more balanced. IMO.
btw, anyone think nate is def. tradeable now with douglas?
i remember last year we passed on the chance of nate+jefferies for expirings.
 
as long as duhon+jefferies gets traded, who gives a damn?
pick&roll with duhon+lee + chandlers jumpshots, jefferies 3, darkos tip in should be enough till nate+al get in.
 
i feel sad for crawford. i would quit ball if i got waived
frown.gif


okay maybe not but damn . . the pain they gotta go through.










okay okay i know.
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by Al3xis

duhon-chandler-jefferies-lee-darko
offensively though, who's makin shots?

Sadly, Al Harrington still is this teams best player.
Agreed with all of that. There is no way we should have our 2 biggest scoring threats in Nate and Al come off the bench. And saying that probablyour 3rd as well cause Gallo may turn into that. That lineup would not score worth %*!%, and agreed as sad as it is Al Harrington is still our best player. Ithink D'Antoni knows all this and would no way have Al being on the bench to start the season. imo it is more likely to have Nate and Al both startingbefore both coming off the bench. Im all down for Darko starting to bring some interior defense... but a) it wont be right away... and b) it wont be in placefor Al it would be for Jeffries. We needs Al's scoring out there to start the game.

This dude Hughes was in the lineup last night in crunch time with the rookies and nbdl players and still got outplayed
laugh.gif
. I think hes like 1-23 from the field in preseason and you can tell when you watch him he is playing lazy.
laugh.gif
roll.gif
forreal, i think dude has overtaken Tim thomas as "Fugazi"... bum
laugh.gif
indifferent.gif


and mahh man Landry... congrats brotha i wish the best. Ever since i heard that story of him paying his own way to camp and %*!% ive been rooting for him, ilove the underdogs. Dude was a nonfactor
pimp.gif
 
if you guys are really that concerned about scoring, then a lineup of nate-chandler-jefferies-lee and darko.
i mean, we're obviously going to put jefferies in the lineup just to improve the chances of trading him, and darko, just because.
i guess im alone for putting darko in the lineup though...
 
Originally Posted by BangDak

if you guys are really that concerned about scoring, then a lineup of nate-chandler-jefferies-lee and darko.
i mean, we're obviously going to put jefferies in the lineup just to improve the chances of trading him, and darko, just because.
i guess im alone for putting darko in the lineup though...
nahh dog im with you and i think Darko will move into the lineup some point in this year, im just saying he wont opening night. I know thatD'Antoni likes his D as do we all, but dude hasnt started one preseason game its obviously a sign that its not gonna happen. I dont mind that lineup and iwant Nate to start. But it is wayyy more likely that D'Antoni will opt to have Duhon start over Nate rather than have Dako start over Al... yadigggz? Istill see Darko getting good minutes regardless though...

in unrelated news has anyone been able to find a vid of that promotional ad that was
pimp.gif
pimp.gif
from last nights game??
nerd.gif
 
hughes is much more of a bum than fugazi. Let him rot on the bench.

lebron only comes to the garden once this year, and it's in the very beginning of the season. Coincidence? I think not. Stern wants that talk quiet at theend of the year. Why the hell do we need to play lebron twice there?
 
Back
Top Bottom