2025 NBA Draft Thread

Just preparing myself for the Thunder pick to end up like 11

Please just a legit shooter and/or an interior defending, athletic big

Bet everything I own we draft someone who shoots in the 20s from 3 tho

 


2023 NBA mock draft: When will projected No. 2 pick Scoot Henderson return to the G League Ignite?

Victor Wembanyama has cemented himself as the overwhelming favorite to be the No. 1 pick in the 2023 NBA draft behind an MVP-caliber season in France. But after him? Increasing uncertainty.

Scoot Henderson, the presumed No. 2 pick, hasn't played since Nov. 18 after spending three weeks in concussion protocol following a nasal fracture, causing him to miss the G League Winter Showcase, which was heavily attended by NBA decision-makers.

We had an opportunity to watch Henderson participate in three separate practices in Las Vegas, where he looked every bit the elite prospect he's billed as. G League officials said he is being held out due to an abundance of caution as the risk of soft tissue damage is exponentially higher after suffering a concussion and their performance staff wants "to protect his body for his long-term goals."

Several NBA executives in Las Vegas declared they would be surprised if Henderson played in another game this season because he's all but assured of being a top-3 pick.

That thinking was shot down emphatically by G League Ignite officials, who said Henderson is an elite competitor who refuses to entertain that type of discussion and will be back on the court soon.

Behind Henderson, the college basketball picture is even murkier, with injuries, absences and underwhelming or inconsistent play of several highly-regarded prospects muddying the picture significantly.

Arkansas freshman Nick Smith Jr. has once again been ruled out indefinitely, this time for "right knee management," an issue that already caused him to miss his team's first six games. Smith has played five games so far this season, shooting 39% from the field and struggling defensively but still showed significant flashes of what made him such a highly touted prospect coming out of high school. NBA teams are hopeful this isn't the last we see of him.

Fellow five-star freshmen Cam Whitmore, Brandon Miller, Cason Wallace, Jarace Walker, Keyonte George, Anthony Black, Kel'el Ware, Kyle Filipowski, Gregory Jackson II, Dillon Mitchell, Dariq Whitehead, Dereck Lively, Julian Phillips, Adem Bona, Jordan Walsh and Amari Bailey have all been up and down this season. With many prospects yet to play more than a handful of games against high-level competition, the conference schedules will go a long way in helping NBA executives determine how to rank prospects, a process that most say is still in an early stage.

While many prospects have work to do to shore up their standing, others have done well to make a case for themselves as legitimate first-round prospects. Here are a handful of players who caught our eye in December along with our latest mock draft.

First round

1. Detroit Pistons
Victor Wembanyama | Metropolitans 92 | PF/C | Age: 18.9
2. Houston Rockets
Scoot Henderson | G League Ignite | PG | Age: 18.8
3. San Antonio Spurs
Amen Thompson | Overtime Elite | PG/SG | Age: 19.9
4. Charlotte Hornets (to Atlanta if 17-30)
Nick Smith Jr. | Arkansas | PG/SG | Age: 18.6
5. Oklahoma City Thunder
Ausar Thompson | Overtime Elite | SG/SF | Age: 19.9
6. Orlando Magic
Cam Whitmore | Villanova | SF/PF | Age: 18.4
7. Washington Wizards
Brandon Miller | Alabama | SF | Age: 20.0
8. New Orleans Pelicans (from Los Angeles Lakers)
Jarace Walker | Houston | PF | Age: 19.3
9. Orlando Magic (from Chicago Bulls)
Cason Wallace | Kentucky | PG/SG | Age: 19.1
10. Indiana Pacers
Jett Howard | Michigan | SG/SF | Age: 19.2
11. Utah Jazz (from Minnesota Timberwolves)
Keyonte George | Baylor | SG | Age: 19.1
12. Toronto Raptors
Anthony Black | Arkansas | PG/SG | Age: 18.9
13. Golden State Warriors
Kel'el Ware | Oregon | C | Age: 18.6
14. LA Clippers
Kyle Filipowski | Duke | PF/C | Age: 19.1
15. Miami Heat
Gregory Jackson II | South Carolina | PF/C | Age: 18.0
16. Atlanta Hawks
Dillon Mitchell | Texas | PF | Age: 19.2
17. Portland Trail Blazers
Gradey **** | Kansas | SG/SF | Age: 19.0
18. Sacramento Kings
Rayan Rupert | New Zealand Breakers | SG/SF | Age: 18.5
19. Utah Jazz
Dariq Whitehead | Duke | SG/SF | Age: 18.3
20. New York Knicks
Terquavion Smith | NC State | SG | Age: 19.9
21. Los Angeles Lakers (from New Orleans Pelicans)
James Nnaji | Barcelona | C | Age: 18.3
22. New York Knicks (from Dallas Mavericks)
Dereck Lively II | Duke | C | Age: 18.8
23. Charlotte Hornets (from Denver Nuggets)
Taylor Hendricks | UCF | PF | Age: 19.0
24. Brooklyn Nets
Brice Sensabaugh | Ohio St. | SF/PF | Age: 19.1
25. Phoenix Suns
Sidy Cissoko | G League Ignite | SG/SF | Age: 18.7
26. Memphis Grizzlies
Leonard Miller | G League Ignite | SF/PF | Age: 19.0
27. Utah Jazz (from Philadelphia 76ers)
Maxwell Lewis | Pepperdine | SF | Age: 20.4
28. Houston Rockets (from Milwaukee Bucks)
Nikola Durisic | Mega MIS | SG/SF | Age: 18.8
29. Indiana Pacers (from Cleveland Cavaliers)
Jaime Jaquez Jr. | UCLA | SF | Age: 21.8
30. Indiana Pacers (via Boston Celtics)
Coleman Hawkins | Illinois | PF | Age: 21.0

Second round

31. Detroit Pistons
Marcus Sasser | Houston | PG/SG | Age: 22.2
32. Boston Celtics (from Houston Rockets)
Reece Beekman | Virginia | PG | Age: 21.2
33. San Antonio Spurs
Terrence Shannon Jr. | Illinois | SG/SF | Age: 22.4
34. Philadelphia 76ers (from Charlotte Hornets)
Kris Murray | Iowa | PF | Age: 22.3
35. Oklahoma City Thunder
Noah Clowney | Alabama | PF | Age: 18.4
36. Orlando Magic
Julian Phillips | Tennessee | SF | Age: 19.1
37. Charlotte Hornets (from Washington Wizards)
Ousmane Ndiaye | Baskonia | PF/C | Age: 18.7
38. Los Angeles Lakers
Colby Jones | Xavier | SF | Age: 20.5
39. Los Angeles Lakers (from Chicago Bulls)
Ricky Council IV | Arkansas | SG/SF | Age: 21.3
40. Sacramento Kings (from Indiana Pacers)
Jordan Hawkins | Connecticut | SG | Age: 20.6
41. Memphis Grizzlies (from Minnesota Timberwolves)
Keyontae Johnson | Kansas St. | SF | Age: 22.5
42. Toronto Raptors
Julian Strawther | Gonzaga | SF | Age: 20.6
43. Indiana Pacers (from Miami Heat)
Adem Bona | UCLA | C | Age: 19.7
44. Cleveland Cavaliers (from Golden State Warriors)
Jordan Walsh | Arkansas | SF/PF | Age: 18.8
45. Brooklyn Nets (from Atlanta Hawks)
Andre Jackson | Connecticut | SG/SF | Age: 21.1
46. LA Clippers
Jalen Wilson | Kansas | SF/PF | Age: 22.1
47. Boston Celtics (from Portland Trail Blazers)
Emoni Bates | Eastern Michigan | SG/SF | Age: 18.9
48. Sacramento Kings
Amari Bailey | UCLA | PG | Age: 18.8
49. Charlotte Hornets (from Utah Jazz)
Mouhamed Gueye | Washington State | PF/C | Age: 20.1
50. Minnesota Timberwolves (from New York Knicks)
Ryan Kalkbrenner | Creighton | C | Age: 20.9
51. Atlanta Hawks (from New Orleans Pelicans)
Matthew Murrell | Mississippi | SG | Age: 21.0
52. Denver Nuggets (from Dallas Mavericks)
Azuolas Tubelis | Arizona | PF/C | Age: 20.7
53. Atlanta Hawks (from Brooklyn Nets)
Kevin McCullar Jr. | Kansas | SF | Age: 21.7
54. Phoenix Suns
Oscar Tshiebwe | Kentucky | C | Age: 23.0
55. Memphis Grizzlies
Jaylen Clark | UCLA | SG/SF | Age: 21.2
56. Milwaukee Bucks
Juan Nunez | Ratiopharm Ulm | PG | Age: 18.5
57. Milwaukee Bucks (from Cleveland Cavaliers)
Caleb Love | North Carolina | SG | Age: 21.2
58. Boston Celtics
Zach Edey | Purdue | C | Age: 20.6
Note: The Chicago Bulls and Philadelphia 76ers forfeited a 2023 second-round draft pick.

Taylor Hendricks | 6-9 | PF | Age: 19.0 | UCF | No. 23 in Top 100
Hendricks has emerged as one of the most productive freshmen in college basketball, leading UCF in scoring at 15.3 points per game while shooting 46% from 3. At 6-foot-9 with long arms and a strong combination of mobility and explosiveness, he has a clear NBA physical profile and brings coveted floor spacing and high-energy defense, and crashes the offensive glass.

Hendricks has some questions to answer: His two worst games have come against the best teams UCF has faced in Miami and Missouri -- and he doesn't appear to be much of a shot-creator or passer, while at times the game moves too fast for him on both ends. Games against the likes of Houston and Memphis will be studied closely by NBA executives in the coming weeks.

Still, Hendricks' combination of physical tools, intensity, perimeter shooting and potential defensive versatility is highly intriguing, especially considering he just turned 19 a month ago.

Brice Sensabaugh | 6-6 | SF/PF | Age: 19.1 | Ohio State | No. 24 in Top 100
At 29 points per 40 minutes, Sensabaugh isn't just the best per-minute scorer in this freshman class, he's one of the most dangerous offensive players in college basketball. After initially limiting his playing time because of defensive concerns, Ohio State inserted him into its starting lineup earlier this month. He had his best performance of the season at the CBS Sports Classic at Madison Square Garden, where NBA executives saw him explode for 22 points, eight rebounds and three assists against North Carolina, including the potential game-winning shot over one of the best defenders in the country in 23-year-old Leaky Black.

Sensabaugh doesn't look like a potential one-and-done prospect at first glance as he's undersized for the power forward position he often plays at 6-6 with wide hips, thick legs and average length. He clearly needs to continue to improve his conditioning, something he has started to address since leading the Nike EYBL in per-minute scoring at 38.5 points per 40 minutes in summer 2021.

But he's a better athlete than he gets credit for, possessing impressive body control and some underrated explosiveness as a finisher around the basket.

Sensabaugh is an elite perimeter shooter, converting 49% of his 3-point attempts this season. He's dynamic with his shot-making ability, showing the ability to hit pull-up jumpers, relocate off shot fakes for difficult side-step attempts, and he has a quick release and polished footwork getting into spot-up 3-pointers. He's also capable of creating offense for himself in the post, elevating in midrange spots or attacking the rim aggressively with his strong frame and solid ballhandling ability.

After looking somewhat like a black hole early in the season, Sensabaugh has shown some passing chops in small doses, posting 10 assists in his past two games after generating just two assists in the first month of the season.

Defensively is where the biggest questions remain, as Sensabaugh often looks lost off the ball, rarely gets in a defensive stance, shows bad closeout technique and gets scored on frequently in the post. His lack of size, length and quickness is an issue, but so is his lack of intensity. He generates very few steals, blocks or rebounds to complement his incredible scoring prowess. He has struggled with foul trouble in some of the toughest games he has played in thus far, something that could be a bigger issue now that he's receiving starting-caliber minutes going into Big Ten play.

Maxwell Lewis | 6-7 | SG/SF | Age: 20.4 | Pepperdine | No. 28 in Top 100
Lewis took a circuitous route to Pepperdine, enrolling at four different high schools and then making a pit stop at the failed Chameleon BX program, a training program intended to prepare prospects for the NBA draft. He was forced to sit out his first six games at Pepperdine because of NCAA eligibility concerns but had some impressive showings in the WCC before suffering a season-ending wrist injury in February.

Now a sophomore, Lewis is in the midst of a highly productive season, posting 18.7 points, 5.8 rebounds, 2.3 assists, 1.3 blocks and 1.1 steals in 32 minutes per game, shooting 57% inside the arc, 39% for 3 and 85% from the free throw line, putting him firmly on the NBA radar despite his team stumbling to a 5-7 record against Division I competition.

Lewis looks the part of an NBA shooting guard, standing 6-7 with a 6-10 wingspan and a thin, but intriguing frame that should be able to carry plenty of weight. He's a fluid mover with long strides, smooth hesitation moves and a wide array of jab-step, rocker-step, crossover and behind-the-back moves that suggest significant talent he has yet to tap into. He finishes creatively around the basket, shows dynamic shot-making prowess inside and outside the arc and finds teammates unselfishly passing off a live dribble or making the right reads out of the pick-and-roll. Lewis makes a handful of tantalizing plays each game of which few prospects are capable.

But Lewis has plenty of question marks as well; he lacks a degree of physicality playing through contact, gets to the free throw line infrequently and turns the ball over excessively. He gets targeted mercilessly by low-major opponents, getting scored on so consistently that it suggests both apathy and a clear lack of awareness. Despite this, he can recover for blocks and steals thanks to his length and talent, but he is more or less a sieve.

Games against Gonzaga, Saint Mary's, San Francisco and BYU will be important for Lewis to solidify his standing, as his production has fallen off significantly against top-100-caliber competition this season.

Lewis' physical tools, scoring instincts and youthful demeanor suggest significant upside with a strong end of the season and pre-draft process, he might be someone a team will take a flyer on in the first round, hoping to eliminate some of his bad habits.

Jaime Jaquez Jr. | 6-6 | SF/PF | Age: 21.8 | UCLA | No. 30 in Top 100
Jaquez has been on NBA radars for what seems like forever, as a four-year starter who is on track to finish his UCLA career as a top-10 scorer in program history.

After a slow start, Jaquez has been playing like the All-American he was billed as when electing to return for his senior season, carrying UCLA to an 11-2 start that puts it firmly in contention for a return to the NCAA Final Four, which Jaquez helped propel the Bruins to in 2021.
Jaquez is playing a different role this season, tasked with significant offensive responsibility as UCLA's primary half-court creator. He sees his touches in various ways, alternating between the low post, midpost and the perimeter, where he plays a lot of pick-and-roll and is asked to create his own shot frequently in isolation. Playing exclusively off two feet with a wide array of jump-stops, pump-fakes, reverse pivot moves and bully-ball plays, Jaquez doesn't have the most aesthetically pleasing style. He relies heavily on his aggressiveness and physicality, bullying weaker opponents with polished footwork and creativity finishing around the basket. He's an excellent passer who can drive and dish and make intelligent skip passes, and he knows how to draw fouls, but he'll likely need to play a different style in the NBA than the one he does in college.

Jaquez is shooting fewer 3-pointers this season than ever before and has converted just 23% of his attempts, a significant dropoff from the 39% he made as a sophomore. He still shows shot-making prowess with strong mechanics and a polished midrange game, converting 49% of his attempts on decent volume, as well as 77% of his free throws. NBA teams will likely want to see his 3-point volume and accuracy rise but considering his heavy on-ball role for one of the most efficient offenses in college basketball, it's not clear that will happen.

On the other end of the floor, Jaquez remains one of college basketball's premier off-ball defenders, showing outstanding instincts and awareness rotating to help teammates, fighting over screens, busting up dribble handoffs, generating a significant amount of deflections and steals, and providing timely rim protection. Seeing most of his minutes at power forward, his below-average size and quickness renders him less effective as a one-on-one defender, especially when switched onto faster players. NBA teams will have some questions about his ability to transition into being more of a wing.

Jaquez is likely to be a polarizing prospect come draft time, as some teams might view him as a jack of all trades, master of nothing who doesn't have the explosiveness, perimeter shooting or upside they covet. Others could be attracted to his feel for the game, his productivity and the many ways he contributes to winning on both ends of the floor. He's making a case for consideration as a first-round pick with his play this season, something that would only be amplified with a deep NCAA tournament run.

Noah Clowney | 6-10 | PF | Age: 18.4 | Alabama | No. 35 in Top 100
Playing for a non-sneaker-affiliated grassroots program in Team Dickerson and away from the bright lights at Dorman High School in South Carolina, it's easy to understand why Clowney slipped below the radar prior to enrolling at Alabama.

Back-to-back SEC freshman of the week honors and an impressive 16-point, 11-rebound, two-block performance in a win at No. 1-ranked Houston changed things quickly, especially once NBA scouts learned Clowney is the age of a high school senior, turning 18 only last summer.
At 6-10, with a thin but well-proportioned frame, a 7-2 wingspan and excellent mobility, Clowney has strong physical tools for a big man, even though he needs to add bulk to his lanky frame.

Clowney isn't the most polished or consistent offensive player but shows nice versatility to build around long term. He steps into open 3-pointers confidently (10-for-36 in 11 games) with acceptable mechanics, attacks closeouts with his head up, is quick off his feet for above-the-rim finishes, shows ability to make basic reads and passes, and plays with the type of aggressiveness you like to see from a player his age.

Defensively, he brings good energy crashing the glass and strong instincts and mobility rotating for blocks inside the paint and beyond the arc. He also shows the ability to anchor a drop defense much more effectively than most players with his level of experience, staying down on fakes patiently and being difficult to shoot over with his standing reach. His lack of strength is an issue at times guarding older players, and he's still figuring out the nuances of defending on the perimeter, struggling a bit in space because of his somewhat upright stance, but it's never due to a lack of effort.

Clowney might not yet be done growing and could still have another notch he can get to athletically, which would help him find another degree of explosiveness and physicality to match his speed and quickness getting off his feet. His decision-making is a work in progress, and his struggles from the free throw line (56%) temper some of the enthusiasm around his hot-shooting start (primarily fueled by one 5-for-12 outlier game from beyond the arc against South Dakota State).

Not considered a one-and-done candidate entering the season, Clowney could benefit from another year in college to improve his frame and continue to add polish on both ends of the floor, but he certainly checks some boxes NBA teams look for in a young big man.

Azuolas Tubelis | 6-11 | PF | Age: 20.7 | Arizona | No. 52 in Top 100
After two strong campaigns to begin his Arizona career, Tubelis has exploded into one of the best players in college basketball as a junior, posting an outstanding 28.8 points, 12.5 rebounds, 3 assists, 1.5 steals and 1.3 blocks per 40, guiding Arizona to a 12-1 record and No. 5 ranking, and establishing himself as a legit first-team All-American candidate.

Tubelis shoulders a significant load for the No. 1-ranked offense in the country, doing so shooting 63% inside the arc and 80% from the free throw line. He runs the floor hard on every missed basket, looking to establish deep post position and use his outstanding touch around the basket, while drawing quite a few fouls with his unorthodox style of play. Arizona also gives him touches from the top of the key where he either makes smart high-low entry passes to 7-footer Oumar Ballo or beats slower-footed defenders off the dribble with his left hand.

Tubelis is shooting 43% from beyond the arc this season but has taken only one 3-pointer per game, less than he did his first two seasons in Tucson despite opponents daring him to beat them from outside. While he looks good stepping into rhythm 3-pointers thanks to his outstanding touch, he still has work to do on his footwork, shot prep and the extra motion he displays winding up and releasing the ball. Improving his free throw percentage from 68% his first two seasons to 80% this year is encouraging, but he's a career 26.5% shooter from beyond the arc through 270 games and will likely need to score in different ways in the NBA than he does in college.

Tubelis' defense is another area where NBA scouts have questions. While he has improved thanks to his terrific smarts, toughness and instincts, he doesn't cover ground well when isolated due to his upright stance and average lateral quickness. He also lacks the length to be much of a deterrent contesting shots around the basket or on the perimeter and gets targeted a fair amount by opposing teams, fluctuating with his energy level.

Tubelis' productivity and skill level should put him firmly in the draft conversation, but he'll have to continue to make strides with his perimeter shooting, passing and defense to carve out an NBA role. Being a young junior, not turning 21 until late March, helps his cause, and the further he can take his team in the NCAA tournament, the more he'll be able to win over franchises and show his game translates despite his unconventional style of play.

Jaylen Clark | 6-5 | SG/SF | Age: 21.2 | UCLA | No. 55 in Top 100
A defense-oriented role player his first two seasons, Clark has expanded his game and emerged as a highly efficient third option for an 11-2 UCLA team that many consider to be a legitimate Final Four contender.

Clark put his defensive prowess on full display earlier this month with a comprehensive shutdown of Kentucky freshman and projected top-10 pick Cason Wallace, under the watchful eyes of many NBA executives at Madison Square Garden, limiting him to seven points, zero assists and two turnovers on 2-for-13 shooting in UCLA's win.

Clark's combination of length, strength, quickness and intensity is highly impactful, as he regularly steps in for charges, helps off the ball and wreaks havoc getting in passing lanes and crashing the glass. He ranks first in steals among all prospects in the top 100 and is tops among guards in rebounding, but has also found ways to be productive offensively as well, averaging 22 points per 40 on an efficient 66% true shooting percentage while rarely turning the ball over.

Most of his offense comes in transition, posting up and attacking closeouts on straight-line drives, but he has also shown some flashes of effectiveness overpowering weaker defenders off the dribble, finishing through contact and splashing open 3-pointers, hitting 11-for-28 from beyond the arc through 12 games.

Despite the improved play, Clark has some things to prove in Pac-12 play, specifically how translatable or sustainable his offensive game is. He's an average ball handler and passer who plays a lot of bully ball, using his strong frame, and sports a big windup on his stiff spot-up 3-pointer, needing time to get his jumper off and struggling when asked to shoot off the bounce. He's a career 63% free throw shooter and 31% from beyond the arc but has tremendous touch around the basket that indicates he has room to grow in this area.

Already playing a similar role to the one he'd be asked to play in the NBA, Clark is in an outstanding situation to help UCLA to a deep NCAA tournament run, which would put him in position to hear his name called on draft night.
 


I’m back from the G League Showcase in Las Vegas, a wonderful annual event that brings together all 30 teams in the G League and allows everyone in the NBA to scout them in one place, timed just before key roster decisions are made ahead of the league’s guarantee date.

I’ve already written my missive about much of the trade and expansion discussion there, but I did leave one item out for today, which was a larger discussion about one of the teams there: G League Ignite.

Unlike 28 of the other 29 teams, the Ignite are not affiliated with any NBA team. (Mexico City is also unaffiliated. Portland and Phoenix are the only NBA teams without affiliated G League clubs.) Instead, they are run by the league and pay considerable salaries to several young players with the idea of developing them for the NBA. This season, that roster includes Scoot Henderson, London Johnson, Mojave King, Sidy Cissoko, Babacar Sané and Efe Abogidi.

The program is in its third year and has sent Dyson Daniels, Jaden Hardy, MarJon Beauchamp, Jalen Green, Daishen Nix, Isaiah Todd and Jonathan Kuminga to the NBA. However, in talking to people around the league, both leading up to the event and at the event itself, I found a lot of people willing to question the league’s approach.

For starters, why is the league spending all this money to develop players who would just … develop someplace else? What is the point of this, exactly? There was some idea that keeping these players out of rival non-NCAA options like Overtime Elite or the Australian Next Stars program would help market them for the next level, but the G League isn’t exactly playing to packed houses. Meanwhile, with NIL money now a factor in college basketball, will any of these options even be competitive going forward?

From a marketing perspective, thus far the biggest impact of G League Ignite was providing an opponent for Victor Wembanyama’s Metropolitans 92 team when it visited in October. That two-game set massively helped fan the hype machine for next year’s likely top overall pick.

Given the expense, some have questioned the league’s roster choices as well. Paying up for Henderson might be one thing, but most of the other players are fringe prospects. As one league source wondered: “Why are we paying almost half a million for a two-way guy?”

Secondly, there is a deeper question: Is this program even any good at developing players? Maybe you give them a mulligan for the first year in mid-pandemic, but Ignite were objectively a mess last season and seem only slightly better this season. Nobody I’ve talked to thinks the team is well coached or well run, and I am frequently offered this opinion before I can get around to asking about it.

Meanwhile, Hardy looks a million times better on Dallas’s G League team than he did on the Ignite a year ago. Scouts are almost at the point of putting as asterisk next to Ignite players’ numbers, presuming they’ll be better almost anywhere else. Many also question that they aren’t playing for anything that matters, especially relative to an NCAA season. “Every game is the combine for them,” said one league source who offered a similar critique of Overtime Elite.

Ignite left the Showcase with the worst record and worst scoring margin in the G League after nearly doing the same a year ago. (Last season’s games were technically counted as exhibitions except for their 14 Showcase Cup contests; the Ignite went a combined 9-21). Henderson has played only six games; the Ignite won three of those, but are 1-11 without him. They also split two games against Wembanyama’s Metropolitans 92 team in Las Vegas.

Perhaps my characterization goes too far. Canadian forward Leonard Miller has shown clear progress over the course of the season, to give one example, and could push his way into the 2023 first round. (I recently profiled Miller here.) The record, certainly, would look a lot better if Henderson were playing. And if we’re comparing, it’s not like LaMelo Ball had some insane personal growth experience in Australia – he spent the year screwing around and jacking up 40-foot 3s.

So instead, let’s just say that the program has reach a point where people are asking questions. Unlike the G League’s other 29 franchises, this one has to continue proving to 30 NBA owners why it should keep existing. Right now, the sales pitch is falling a bit flat.

Could the WCC have a non-Gonzaga first-round pick for the second straight year?

We may be headed that way. Scouts were extremely late to the game with Santa Clara’s Jalen Williams a year ago, with many not even getting out to see him before the WCC tournament in March. I suspect they’ll arrive more on time with Lewis, especially after his team’s tournament in Hawaii this past week offered some of the few college games worth televising in the Christmas doldrums before conference play begins.

At 6-7 with a solid handle and a 42.9 percent mark on 3-pointers this season, Lewis has definitely established himself as a person of interest for the 2023 draft. Pedants will note that he’s a bit old for a sophomore (he turns 21 in July), and that his push-out jumper may not translate easily against NBA size. This clip offers a look:



That said, a wing with prototype size who can shoot and jump is going to get people on planes, especially when his home gym is perhaps the best winter scouting trip in the continental U.S. (Pepperdine is set on a hill over the beach in Malibu. It’s delightful. Trust me.)

Lewis isn’t just a shooter; he offers just enough on-ball juice and athleticism to be interesting. Check out this drive, for instance. Sure, it’s against Hawaii and an elite big might have smashed this finish off the glass, but this is a pretty smooth crossover and glide into a right-hand finish.


Lewis likely will stay under the radar nationally all year given that he plays for the 143th-ranked team in KenPom. (Only one conference team ranks lower; the Waves are just 7-7, with two non-Division I wins.) But pro scouts will find him. The quality of his team, actually, is the biggest thing working against him right now. If he’s so good, why isn’t his team better?

Scouts will also want to see him against higher-level competition, and that’s where the WCC season gets really interesting. Pepperdine has only played three games against teams ranked in the KenPom top 100 and was demolished, 100-53, by UCLA, the one high-major team it played.

However, the conference slate brings two games each against Gonzaga, St. Marty’s and BYU (not to mention frisky rivals like San Francisco and Portland). The New Year’s Eve tilt at Gonzaga, on a light night for college games, may draw some extra eyeballs.

In other words, I’d characterize this one as very much an eval-in-progress. Yet there is little doubt already that Lewis has a toolset that gives him the benefit of the doubt from evaluators. That and a good conference season could easily see him vault into the first round on draft night.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
2025 NFL Draft Thread
Replies
7
Views
424
bigmike23
bigmike23
ta2and0
Air Max Craze Retro in 2025???
Replies
11
Views
3K
ta2and0
ta2and0
therealest1
Adidas Crazy 2 (Kobe 2) - Returning in 2025
Replies
8
Views
2K
rbk93
rbk93
antidope
2024-2025 NBA Predictions Thread
Replies
7
Views
769
worldbeefreeg
worldbeefreeg
therealest1
Jordan V CNY/Year Of The Snake (Women) - Spring 2025
Replies
0
Views
582
therealest1
therealest1

Latest News

View All News

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

Site contents may not be incorporated into AI training data or any other derivative works without prior express written consent.

Links to participating merchants may generate referral or affiliate commissions that help support our community. See our policies for details. NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

| Xenforo Add-ons © by ©XenTR | Media embeds via s9e/MediaSites
Back
Top Bottom