- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,183
- 202,625
so that report that they were looking for a sucker was fake, I guess it makes sense for the Lions to hook him up.
Josina wrong...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so that report that they were looking for a sucker was fake, I guess it makes sense for the Lions to hook him up.
Kirk to SF/Watson to Vikes isn't happening. Stop trying to make it happen
Rachel is good in my bookOhhh....don't you hit me with my AWG true loves...McAdams #1 and Lacey in Party of Five was my girl when I was 11.
The Lions did well though getting 2 first.
The OL automatically improves with a guy like Stafford. And dont forget, they were top 5 according to PFFF.wanted Stafford when he came out but that's a lot to give up especially if we come up empty the next few years.. our o-line is ****, we have no deep threat since Cooks left, and no draft picks to do anything with so should be interesting
yes. I dont even consider that pick since we picked up 2 for Holmes going to Detroit, but 3rd round picks are great.and a 3rd
Tonight's trade was essentially a salary dump with Stafford included. Stafford alone fetches a first then another first & third to take on Goff's money.
Deshaun Watson is not going for seven first round picks or whatever.
I need to see Stafford on a good team that has a chance to go somewhere.
Colts
Miami
Niners
Rams (but it aint happening)
Cowboys
No disrespect to the Pats, but I dont like the situation they have on offense for him.
Its time Stafford gets to flourish.
Ain't he kinda "cheap" alreadywon't be surprised if the Rams work on an extension to his current deal to help spread the money owed to him on his current deal