- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,234
- 202,672
is anyone else other than you, CP and mamba siding with anything lakers related on thiswhat's that mean. I'm lostsooo only the lakers fans are defending a certain side of this, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
is anyone else other than you, CP and mamba siding with anything lakers related on thiswhat's that mean. I'm lostsooo only the lakers fans are defending a certain side of this, right?
I think Pop is better but I also look at Phil differently because of what he's done to my Knicks. Somehow he turned trash into more trash. **** him.
as a duo, nope
y'all would rather have duncan and robinson as a duo over kobe and shaq and pippen and jordan?
did you see me side with it tho. Spurs are Great and so is pop. Better then Phil IMO but it's not a huge advantage.is anyone else other than you, CP and mamba siding with anything lakers related on this
sooo only the lakers fans are defending a certain side of this, right?
Not going to defend Phil the executive at all. As a coach he's untouchable though.
it doesn't.. you can play zoneI still believe that the triangle can still work with the right players.
it doesn't.. you can play zone
triangle worked back then when they had illegal defenses.. so you were forced to play man and cover ground
now they do it through shooters in certain areas, where they make you legit cover that area because of the player and not because of the rules
I have an extremely simple philosophy on the whole debate.. I don't think phil would have been anywhere near as successful if he was in pops situationdid you see me side with it tho. Spurs are Great and so is pop. Better then Phil IMO but it's not a huge advantage.is anyone else other than you, CP and mamba siding with anything lakers related on this
It's hard to coach superstars. Ask any of the okc coaches.
with Less talent.I have an extremely simple philosophy on the whole debate.. I don't think phil would have been anywhere near as successful if he was in pops situationdid you see me side with it tho. Spurs are Great and so is pop. Better then Phil IMO but it's not a huge advantage.is anyone else other than you, CP and mamba siding with anything lakers related on this
It's hard to coach superstars. Ask any of the okc coaches.
I think pop AT THE VERY LEAST does what phil accomplished
yoSomebody on twitter said the giants releasing Cruz because he told them Kith required he work sundays
[emoji]128557[/emoji][emoji]128553[/emoji]
it worked because of the talent the lakers had.. people don't give pau the credit he deserves.. and Bynum was solid enough when he was actually there.. ditto the fat kardahians husbandI don't think it would be as effective in today's game, but it worked as recently as 2009/2010 when those defensive changes were already well in place for a few years.it doesn't.. you can play zone
triangle worked back then when they had illegal defenses.. so you were forced to play man and cover ground
now they do it through shooters in certain areas, where they make you legit cover that area because of the player and not because of the rules
The personnel definitely matters though. Melo is no Kobe or MJ that's for sure.
I have an extremely simple philosophy on the whole debate.. I don't think phil would have been anywhere near as successful if he was in pops situation
I think pop AT THE VERY LEAST does what phil accomplished
brooks was an idiot.. his time away was big for him.. he actually attended the sloan conference and went and visited other coaches staffs and learned something
did you see me side with it tho. Spurs are Great and so is pop. Better then Phil IMO but it's not a huge advantage.
It's hard to coach superstars. Ask any of the okc coaches.
did you see me side with it tho. Spurs are Great and so is pop. Better then Phil IMO but it's not a huge advantage.is anyone else other than you, CP and mamba siding with anything lakers related on this
It's hard to coach superstars. Ask any of the okc coaches.
I have an extremely simple philosophy on the whole debate.. I don't think phil would have been anywhere near as successful if he was in pops situation
I think pop AT THE VERY LEAST does what phil accomplished
brooks was an idiot.. his time away was big for him.. he actually attended the sloan conference and went and visited other coaches staffs and learned something
I don't know man. Pop had the luxury of dealing with a bunch of choir boys and robots as his best guys. Trying to handle MJ, Kobe, Shaq, hell even Rodman and Artest is an entirely different animal. Juggling all those egos towards a common goal is a task just as great as the Xs & Os. You have to remember Shaq didn't respect Del Harris who was a decent coach, Phil walks in and commands that from jump with his jewelry. Shaq might have got Pop out the paint early.
Cowgirls need to cut Tony [emoji]128064[/emoji]
Nah. You either trade him for something or keep him as the best backup in the NFL.