antidope
Supporter
- 63,367
- 67,567
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
America is gonna win anyways regardless of who goes. It matters not what X player can do in an international setting. The average margin of victory is gonna be like 22 points.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
wall just needs to go into the tryouts and bust his *** and give them a reason not to cut him. he already said he will be the odd man out himself, but if he impresses the coaches, you never know...also him not being with nike doesnt help his cause
It is true. In fact, the avg margin will be bigger than 22.America is gonna win anyways regardless of who goes. It matters not what X player can do in an international setting. The average margin of victory is gonna be like 22 points.
Why do you need more scoring when you have more scoring then you know what to do with. Who here honestly believes team USA would have a scoring problem without Irving? Getting shooters wide open looks helps everyone else score. Why is that lost on the thread.and this is why i said we dont NEED curry. scoring is currys biggest asset. its negated by the other 4 on the floor who are elite scorers as well. at this rate u pick the best players at the role. i would rather a cp3 and kyrie duo, than curry and one of them. cuz having curry surrounded by the USA team means curry cant take like 10 3pters a game. he has to distribute. and whats the point of having curry if he doesnt have the green light to shoot like he wants? id rather have cp3 average 15 assists and still get buckets when needed, than have a ball dominant pg on a team full of elite scorers.Please leave Blake and Chris Paul off the team.
Its probably gonna be like 30.America is gonna win anyways regardless of who goes. It matters not what X player can do in an international setting. The average margin of victory is gonna be like 22 points.
It is true. In fact, the avg margin will be bigger than 22.
However, for the purpose of choosing a roster, what player x can do in an international setting matters.
its like u completely missed the part about there being 4 other elite scorers on the team. why do u need CURRY's shooting when his assist game aint on par of the other two? if you only gonna let the pg shoot a couple 3s and take open layups here and there, cp3, curry, and kyrie will score the same amount. curry is a SCORING pg. u need a pg who CAN score, but who's extremely good at creating plays or assisting. if u got harden,kd,lebron, and DMC on the floor with curry... why would u have curry chucking 3s? honestly?Curry doesn't have to be ball dominant to be effective for that team. His shooting alone should make him a no brainier.
Personally I love these discussionsIts probably gonna be like 30.It is true. In fact, the avg margin will be bigger than 22.America is gonna win anyways regardless of who goes. It matters not what X player can do in an international setting. The average margin of victory is gonna be like 22 points.
However, for the purpose of choosing a roster, what player x can do in an international setting matters.
Idk if it really matters when they're going to run the table anyways. It makes for good conversation I guess.
The latter is all this is for.Its probably gonna be like 30.
Idk if it really matters when they're going to run the table anyways. It makes for good conversation I guess.
do u have an answer?Why do you need Curry's shooting? The best shooter in the world?
Man what kind of question is that?
Why do you need Curry's shooting? The best shooter in the world?
Man what kind of question is that?
do u have an answer?
We don't "need" curry's shooting yes. But we don't need a lot of things for this team
do u have an answer?
Literally can use the same exact argument for Kyrie. Only difference is that the argument makes more sense for Kyrie since Steph's assists numbers blows Kyrie's away
Uhhh yeah he will
team usa. you already have lots of dude that can score and create. Kawhi d and fact that he doesnt need the ball in his hands> what pg brings to team usa. also agreed on just because pg had a injury doesnt mean hes a should be a shoo-in in or deserving of a spot. i cant think like that or believe that comes in to play for any reason. .
Why not? Offensively, Kawhi is more limited than PG. Both are top notch defensively, of course nobody is on KAwhi's level there. But don't "No way" it as if it isn't an argument at all LOL
on a team full of superstars... the best of the best... u think curry has the green light to shoot at will? we just disagree on that point man. this isnt an exhibition and they aint about to let curry have 20 shots a night
Uhhh yeah he will
it seems like yall value currys shooting ability more so than the other pg's playmaking ability. and if u value that more then so be it. but u know he wont have a green light like he does on GS.
Uhhh yeah he will
Steph + a shorter 3 pt line??
Bruh, he better average 10 attempts a game. And I gurantee Bron, KD, Melo will hve NO problems passing Steph the ball once he starts heating up. I wanna see him hang 70 on some tiny eruopean country.