- Jan 31, 2012
- 7,071
- 782
Seattle keeps trading down, wonder what they are stacking up???
Shermans and Chancellors
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seattle keeps trading down, wonder what they are stacking up???
I know guys, Oakland has a history of building up their QB's. He'll shine, sure.
So the fact that the organization is completely different from when Al Davis ran it means nothing? You're smarter than that, CP.
I pretty much said that verbatim too a few posts before you![]()
Lol I didn't catch it, this thread moving fast. My bad.
Seattle keeps trading down, wonder what they are stacking up???
they probably wanted lee
Thinking the same. Their guys probably keep getting pull out from under them.
Essentially, Schneider saying that the meat of their draft board hits in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, and they have a big group of players to choose from there with similar grades. This gives them flexibility to trade back and still pick up highly-rated players for their team. As Schneider relates,
was hoping we could snag lee![]()
I know guys, Oakland has a history of building up their QB's. He'll shine, sure.
So the fact that the organization is completely different from when Al Davis ran it means nothing? You're smarter than that, CP.
I pretty much said that verbatim too a few posts before you![]()
Lol I didn't catch it, this thread moving fast. My bad.
Funny, the Browns have new ownership, you guys go right on along with the same type of statements I made about the Raiders.
But that's different, right?

I know guys, Oakland has a history of building up their QB's. He'll shine, sure.
So the fact that the organization is completely different from when Al Davis ran it means nothing? You're smarter than that, CP.
I pretty much said that verbatim too a few posts before you![]()
Lol I didn't catch it, this thread moving fast. My bad.
Funny, the Browns have new ownership, you guys go right on along with the same type of statements I made about the Raiders.
But that's different, right?

Seattle keeps trading down, wonder what they are stacking up???
they probably wanted lee
Thinking the same. Their guys probably keep getting pull out from under them.
Posted this in the team thread
Essentially, Schneider saying that the meat of their draft board hits in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, and they have a big group of players to choose from there with similar grades. This gives them flexibility to trade back and still pick up highly-rated players for their team. As Schneider relates,
Yeah I mean I actually like Lee, but he's exactly the kind of WR we don't need. All of our guys are undersized. We need a big body.After thinking about it for Seattle, I think staying away from Lee is probably best. They already have injury prone Sidney and Percy at WR...Not to say Lee will be plagued by injury all his career, but Seattle needs a big bodied, durable WR.
They've already turned som UFA into studs, I'm sur they're not worried about the big names.
I'm thinking Lattimereagles looking for what here? TE?
I know guys, Oakland has a history of building up their QB's. He'll shine, sure.
So the fact that the organization is completely different from when Al Davis ran it means nothing? You're smarter than that, CP.
I pretty much said that verbatim too a few posts before you![]()
Lol I didn't catch it, this thread moving fast. My bad.
Funny, the Browns have new ownership, you guys go right on along with the same type of statements I made about the Raiders.
But that's different, right?
That's not a dismissal of what we're saying though. Straw man argument. You're saying Oakland can't develop QBs because it never has. You bringing up what other people are saying to troll Cleveland doesn't make you right.
And for the record I think Cleveland has done well in the draft for the most part.

well, okay.