- Jul 21, 2011
- 5,897
- 1,189
Shaq called Ibaka a superstar.
WUT
WUT
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Naw, wasn't really talking about series threads. But hey, if you guys think this way is best, who am I to rock the boat?We did Series threads last year and they were inactive to the point where they were locked because the majority of people just stayed in the playoff thread. There was a thread in General about this very thing and most people said they liked the fact that official threads got rid of the clutter that making threads for every single thing that happens causes
Well hey! According to Shaq, Serge Ibaka is a superstar too. All off of effort.
Shaq called Ibaka a superstar.
WUT
With how much people in here reach its kind of hard to differentiate the sarcasm sometimesHell no, I was sarcastic. Stockton would be amazing in any era. I guarantee you many people don't think stockton cold keep up with this current influx of "super athletic freak" athletes though.
Well hey! According to Shaq, Serge Ibaka is a superstar too. All off of effort.
That means Shaq would have never been a superstar.
Naw, wasn't really talking about series threads. But hey, if you guys think this way is best, who am I to rock the boat?
And yeah Dub, I know there is a Knick thread for Woodson and the Chi one for Noah. But when you venture into those threads, the rules prohibit you from flaming or whatever. Like someone can't go into the Chi thread and say "Noah sucks, he doesn't deserve it" w/o getting a warning or ambushed by the Bulls fans y'know?
A separate thread welcomes anyone to share their view in however way they want.
Honestly, isn't that the way it was? Not sure how everyone suddenly seems to act as if that way wasn't the original way things were done.
Serge is a superstar though. 14 8 and 3? dude thats all star numbersSo much more offensive them him saying all white people and 7 foot black people look alike.
Nba has some issue where they feel the need to manufacture superstars. It's wierd.
I totally get what you're saying, to add on it sometimes its hard to have a centralized discussion on a topic when it can easily get lost in a thread that has so many people posting and changing the subject.Naw, wasn't really talking about series threads. But hey, if you guys think this way is best, who am I to rock the boat?We did Series threads last year and they were inactive to the point where they were locked because the majority of people just stayed in the playoff thread. There was a thread in General about this very thing and most people said they liked the fact that official threads got rid of the clutter that making threads for every single thing that happens causes
And yeah Dub, I know there is a Knick thread for Woodson and the Chi one for Noah. But when you venture into those threads, the rules prohibit you from flaming or whatever. Like someone can't go into the Chi thread and say "Noah sucks, he doesn't deserve it" w/o getting a warning or ambushed by the Bulls fans y'know?
A separate thread welcomes anyone to share their view in however way they want.
Honestly, isn't that the way it was? Not sure how everyone suddenly seems to act as if that way wasn't the original way things were done.
I feel like they would stick to this thread though. Why troll 10 people when you can troll 100 in the main thread?Shuges, it's not gonna work that way nowadays. Too many trolls and thread derailments would kill those kinda threads.
But everyone is cool with:Definitely disagree.
Nobody wants to see the first page of the forum full of individual threads of silly *** debates.