2013-2014 NBA Thread - IND @ WAS and OKC @ LAC on ESPN

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doesn't it have to go through the union?

No way they approve.

pffft.


Those kids ain't in the league, they don't pay dues.

Every 19 year old in the league means a 33 year old is getting kicked out they have every incentive to keep them out of the L as long as possible.

The only hope is the agents influence the players to stop it, but they don't even have a union head.
 
Last edited:
i just remember they were having trouble passing the 1 year rule for college, so I just assumed it'd be harder to push that to 2 years
 
Even tho bosh threw a bad pass and the play didn't work it was a great play drew up by spo. Everything cleared up for lebron in the lane.
 
I thought they wanna take out the one and done rule because of the talent level in the NBA is terrible. They want kids to stay in school and get better before they come in and fail
 
I thought they wanna take out the one and done rule because of the talent level in the NBA is terrible. They want kids to stay in school and get better before they come in and fail

That was the main reason for implementing the 1-and-done rule to begin with. Hasn't exactly solved the problem though
 
The spurs play such beautiful basketball. Crisp ball movement. They always know where each other are on the court.
 
I thought they wanna take out the one and done rule because of the talent level in the NBA is terrible. They want kids to stay in school and get better before they come in and fail

horse ****.

1. getting to pay them the rookie salary one year close to prime.
2. free marketing for future superstars.
3. 1 extra year to evaluate which they THINK will lead to less busts. (no evidence of this.)

College does not "develop" NBA players, its one of the biggest myths in sports.
 
Last edited:
I said it before man and I'll say it again.

The d league gets a bad rap.

#1 and #3 pick in the 2013 draft had no reason to not be in the d league.

just didn't make sense.

it's for "development" right?
 
The d-league is barley playing real basketball, they could fix the d league and actually try and develop players but they would rather have a free minor league system and a d-league so they can keep guys like Pierre Jackson from going overseas and making real cash, while pretending like they have a better shot of making the NBA from there.
 
Last edited:
I think it'd be best to allow kids to come straight out of HS but mandate at least 1-2 years in D-league. Or you gotta go to college for at least 3 years.
 
I think it'd be best to allow kids to come straight out of HS but mandate at least 1-2 years in D-league. Or you gotta go to college for at least 3 years.

why? for what purpose?

why make kids stay longer in a broken system?


what does that do?
 
For those who want to get actual education? Not every student-athlete will go on to become a pro.


nobody is stopping them from getting an education.

if you remember very few guys came out straight from high school, only elite prospects or guys who couldn't qualify, and if you look at the history, high school guys were more reliable picks than college
kids.


why force them to get a fake education that they don't need, and also doesn't develop NBA skills.
 
horse ****.

1. getting to pay them the rookie salary one year close to prime.
2. free marketing for future superstars.
3. 1 extra year to evaluate which they THINK will lead to less busts. (no evidence of this.)

College does not "develop" NBA players, its one of the biggest myths in sports.

Been saying this for the longest. For the most part, players who are "ready" for the NBA, or who are legit NBA prospects / on NBA radar, college does not do anything for these players. They are already as NBA ready as they will be until they actually get into the NBA. Hell, that's the reason why they are being looked at for the NBA in the first place. The prime example of this to me is the 07 high school draft class. That high school draft class was as NBA ready as they were going to be. Also, what people fail to account for when they say "College prepares players for the NBA" is that the NBA is just that...NBA. You will never be able to simulate it. Therefore, I would argue that players are just as equipped for the NBA coming out of high school as they are 2 years out of college on the basis of neither have experience in the NBA.

They want 2 years minimum IMO because 1) all the points you listed above. and 2) it works out for College Bball because they would end up with 2 years of superstars instead of one leading to obviously more revenue.
 
For those who want to get actual education? Not every student-athlete will go on to become a pro.

The staying in college for two year rule isn't for those "student-athletes." In most cases, those guys aren't actual NBA prospects and are at college to get a degree. This rule is for players who essentially are NBA ready out of high school, those who have legit aspirations of getting drafted either out of high school, or one year removed from high school.
 
I agree I think it should go back to the way it was.

If a player wants to go pro after HS why can't he?

If a team wants to risk taking an 18 year why can't they?

Just cause you enter the draft outta HS doesn't guarantee you will even get picked, and it's not like teams are forced to take those players.
 
Like what does a prospect "develop" by playing against Jim Boehiem's 2-3 zone, in a 35 second shot clock? :lol

Or Rick Patino's 1-2-11 press?

all **** that NEVER happen in the NBA.


Its wild, it grind my gears so much.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom