- Jan 18, 2006
- 40,372
- 45,126
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Man, every time Trevor drives I expect him to tear up his knee with how awkward he jumpsOriginally Posted by goukiteg
The only thing that bothers me about Ariza is sometimes he thinks he's Kobe out there with his crazy %%! rim attacks and AWKWARD layups.
Originally Posted by LiCeNseD To BaLL
damn guys my dads been calling my relatives that lives in Tehran and they havent been picking up or calling back. My family is super worried, all that protesting and killing going on in Iran, i hope my relatives are okay.
Originally Posted by CP1708
Odom can also run the offense as a 4, and can just do more things. Ariza can't even dribble yet without lookin at the ground.
Originally Posted by Long Beach Vincey
On to the draft. Assuming LA keeps their 29 pick, I'd like to see this:
2. Darren Collison, cat quick PG with a decent jumper, steady handle. He may be able to develop into a thief as well, has quick hands.
[h2]Could Kobe Bryant opt-out and take less to help Lakers re-sign Odom and Ariza?[/h2]
Posted by Tim Kawakami on June 14th, 2009 at 10:05 pm | Categorized as NBA
* Side note: I don't know what Phil Jackson is going to do. I'm sure retiring is a big and tantalizing option. But I don't think it's more than 50/50 for him and if I had to guess, I'd say he comes back next year. He's going to miss Tex Winter, but Phil still loves the job and the money and, of course, hanging around with Jeanie Buss. He might want to do one more year with Derek Fisher, just to keep playing him when everybody says Phil shouldn't.
First: Lakers got their championship (in five over Orlando, gee, would've never guessed!), Phil Jackson got his record 10th coaching title, and Kobe Bryant got his fourth ring and first without Shaquille O'Neal.
Congratulations to them all. Orlando played them tougher than I expected, but the Lakers still dominated Games 1 and 5 and came through in every moment of Games 2 and 4 when they had to, and Orlando did not.
But onward. Always gotta move forward.
And I'm wondering: Could Bryant seal his reputation as a franchise leader by opting-out this summer… and taking a LOWER average salary in order to give the Lakers more flexibility to re-sign both Lamar Odom and Trevor Ariza?
Because nobody really sees a cogent way for Lakers owner Jerry Buss, even flush with cash and willing to blow some extra money because of the title, to go sailing $20M into the luxury tax.
And that's almost certainly what he'd have to do to pay Odom and Ariza close to fair free-agent market price this summer.
Without either of them, the Lakers are already committed to $74.1M for 8 signed players next season, led by Kobe's $23M (if he doesn't opt-out), Pau Gasol's $16.4M and Andrew Bynum's $12.5M.
The luxury-tax line was $71.15M this season… and projects to be lower than that next season, thanks to the recession.
So the Lakers are already about $4M or $5M over the luxury tax line for next season, without spending a penny for either Ariza or Odom. You saw the playoffs: The Lakers needed both Odom and Ariza to win the title, absolutely.
Now, presuming that Bynum keeps developing, you can possibly see that, if they had to pick one or the other to pay, the Lakers could probably imagine letting Odom go and keeping Ariza (at the mid-level exception).
In fact, if I had to guess, I'd say that's the tentative Lakers plan: Get Ariza long-term for the mid-level, at about $5.8M to start, which would jump the Lakers to almost $80M in salary commitments and put them about $12M into luxury tax.
For nine players (the signed 8 plus Ariza).
I don't think there'd be room for Odom (at a similar MLE deal or for more) in that scenario. I just don't see Buss going $19M or $20M into luxury tax-that'd be an additional $38M to $40M cost, since teams over the lux-tax line must pay a dollar-for-dollar penalty.
Without other salary adjustments, I think the Lakers would re-sign Ariza, let Odom hit the market, then take their chances with Kobe, Gasol, Bynum and Ariza. Wouldn't be the worst team. But wouldn't be for sure the best one, either.
But…
What if Kobe did what Kevin Garnett and Tim Duncan magnanimously/wisely did before him?
Garnett accepted an extension from Boston a year ago that kicks in this summer, which drops his salary from $24.8M to $16.4M and helps out the Celtics long-term.
Duncan has a two-year extension starting in 2010-'11 for $18.7M and $21.3M, far less than he could've gotten.
So… as a gesture of leadership and win-first mentality and I'm-not-a-bad-teammate-big-mindedness…
What if Bryant acknowledged that he needs Odom and Ariza if he wants to maximize his chances to go back-to-back (which Shaq did not accomplish with Miami)?
What if Bryant exercises his right to opt-out of the remaining two years of his original 7-year deal, at $23M for next year and $24.8M for 2010-'11…
Expressly to take something like $20M next year from the Lakers and $21.5M the year after that and $23M and so on?
If Bryant did that, he'd still be one of the highest-paid players in the league (which he must be), and he'd give the Lakers $3M extra wiggle room to sign Odom, presuming Ariza gets the MLE.
The Lakers could pull that one off, I think. Odom could take a starting salary of about $8M (he made $11.4M this year) and extend it out four more years, with the Derek Fisher deal coming off the books after next season to help things out.
I think Odom would want to stay in this situation, if the money is fair.
If Kobe drops to $20M next year, and Odom comes in at $8M and Ariza at $5.8M… that would put the Lakers at about $85M in payroll next season… about $16M over the projected lux-tax line, and I think Jerry Buss could and should accept that one.
I wouldn't imagine Kobe would go much lower than $20M, since he has never given a dollar back in his entire career and in fact was one of the few players to vote against the implementation of a maximum salary back in 1998.
And Bryant logically could look over at multi-millionaire Buss and realize that Buss will be raking in the dough, however deeply the Lakers go into luxury tax, thanks to the glamor that Bryant brings to Staples Center (and the home playoff dates and the local TV revenue).
And Bryant would want to stay near $20M, even if he's cutting his rate, because LeBron James is due to get near the $20M mark in any extension in the summer of 2010, and I don't think Bryant wants or should volunteer to take less than LeBron or Carmelo Anthony.
Hey, Bryant is a stubborn guy. He might not want to take a dollar less than he is earning. Heck, he might opt-out and see if another team can open space for him or force a sign-and-trade or whatever.
But I doubt Kobe sees the wisdom in doing any of those controversial things, and a few days ago said that he does not foresee leaving the Lakers this summer.
It's in his best interests to remain a Laker and see how many titles he can accumulate as a Laker.
It's in his best interests to have Odom and Ariza remain his teammates.
It's in Bryant's best interests to be perceived as sacrificing a bit for the larger cause.
All the puzzle pieces fit. I'm sure the Lakers would love for him to make the gesture. To see if this could work.
It's up to Kobe.
And now we are hearing he may not opt out of the contract....
The gift and curse that is kobe bean bryant...