- May 23, 2005
- 63,609
- 50,740
dudes with that female IG face pose
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dudes with that female IG face pose
seen dude in person at the boiling crab in downtown la nobody noticed dude but me
Too much matching imo. Would've looked better in a denim shirt or different color flannel
Needs some better jeans too.
I believe the term is "pout face"dudes with that female IG face pose
I believe the term is "pout face"
You can ask DJ Proto. He seems to be an expert.
completely agreeI think the world was a better place when most young men dressed like that.
Originality at it's finest
i think a lot of the post XIV jays were ahead of their time. IMO I feel like as style changes, they seem to fit nicely with newer trends..but at the time when they dropped they were terrible for casual wear.
Not really it, the same exact Jordans people were wearing with baggy jeans, they're now wearing with skinny jeans.XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX, XX3 looked fine with baggy jeans. The type of pants a lot of people wear these days, not so much. They go better with earlier retro Js.i think a lot of the post XIV jays were ahead of their time. IMO I feel like as style changes, they seem to fit nicely with newer trends..but at the time when they dropped they were terrible for casual wear.
Not really it, the same exact Jordans people were wearing with baggy jeans, they're now wearing with skinny jeans.
i think a lot of the post XIV jays were ahead of their time. IMO I feel like as style changes, they seem to fit nicely with newer trends..but at the time when they dropped they were terrible for casual wear.
XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX, XX3 looked fine with baggy jeans. The type of pants a lot of people wear these days, not so much. They go better with earlier retro Js.
If 6's and 7's can be worn withjeans nowadays, I don't see why 20's, 17's, etc can't.
never forget#NTdenim