- Jun 1, 2006
- 23,632
- 27,199
Except Sasha WAS better than Charlotte when people were saying that
Charlotte has come a very long way
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except Sasha WAS better than Charlotte when people were saying that
Whos the guy that said no way SD would have 3 womens singles matches at Elimination Chamber? Cash me outside how bow dah!!!
Jk in all seriousness, Becky vs Mickie added to the card
Where in the guide to being top 10 all time does it say that you MUST be THEE guy to be included?
And why is that qualification given more importance than being FANTASTIC on mic, FANTASTIC in ring, and having a period of high level relevance that stretches across three decades?
Be serious for JUST a second of your life..........He beat Rock and Stone Cold in the same night. You sounding like a clown wash yo face.
Right. She might be top 5 as a complete wrestler in the WWE right now.
Faxs B!
Sasha needs to go heel
TouchéBe serious for JUST a second of your life..........
She's so small it's hard to buy her as a heel when next to Charlotte and Nia.
The same play a player that hasn't been THEEEEE dude on a pro basketball team doesn't have the right to claim he is the running for best of all time.
Much easier to do well when the company hasn't placed all of their eggs into your basket.
This. I believe the wwe dropped the ball having her a face in the first place. Also I wish she was on SD being the top female heel. The Queen and The Boss on the same show isn't a good thing for the characters to grow.I think she could pull it off again if she took a page out of her nxt heel days. She was a bad ***** back then.
This reminds me of the concept that Dan Marino shouldn't be mentioned as an all time great because he doesn't have a ring.
It's placing too much emphasis behind a single factor in order to discredit a performer who was excellent in every other department.
Sasha as a heel is much better than Charlotte.
Except Sasha WAS better than Charlotte when people were saying that
I disagree with it being like the rings argument completely.This reminds me of the concept that Dan Marino shouldn't be mentioned as an all time great because he doesn't have a ring.
It's placing too much emphasis behind a single factor in order to discredit a performer who was excellent in every other department.
WAS she?I think she could pull it off again if she took a page out of her nxt heel days. She was a bad ***** back then.
Sooooooooo you on your trolling mode now. You know damn the boss was a heel gimmick.When Sasha was in NXT, other than her taking the little girls headband, what made her an actual heel?
I disagree with it being like the rings argument completely.
That one single factor we are speaking about is a huge factor though.
If we aren't going to consider placement on the card as a KEY Factor in these GOAT lists, where do we draw the line?
How far below the main event picture are we going to allow for a wrestler to be considered the Best of All Time.
I just feel that role is a MAJOR part of the weeding out process when labeling folks the best ever. The more responsibility a wrestler has in his company, the more consideration he should receive in all time votes
SD woman division is good but also bad in a way. SD is more deep. But Raw has the best female wrestler in the universe The Queen. SD doesn't have that breakout talent like a Sasha or a Baylee. Becky is trash. Bliss is okay.
Bailee is nothing more than a jobber with an entrance
Lynch is way better than her and I dont eem care for becky liek that
Pro sports titles are earned because of a teams collective effort..A wrestlers titles are given to them based on several factors, the most important being the confidence the owner of the organizations has in you to carry his company..So if a wrestler hasn't been given the World title then they can't be in the discussion of all time greats..
You know damn the boss was a heel gimmick.
I like this discussion.Pro sports titles are earned because of a teams collective effort..A wrestlers titles are given to them based on several factors, the most important being the confidence the owner of the organizations has in you to carry his company..So if a wrestler hasn't been given the World title then they can't be in the discussion of all time greats..