dahuhuhyah
Banned
- 1,075
- 132
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2013
I disagree about other matches being better(sure your gonna point out some Japanese match or because I said that you1. What have you watched outside of WWE this year?
Did you watch Brock vs. Punk?
Cena vs. Punk?
Bryan vs. Orton (Kendo stick finish)
Any of the G1?
Plenty of matches were better. But it is all opinionated so we are entitled to our own opinions.
Crowd interaction definitely matters. Watch any of the matches that are deemed great and they have a common theme. Crowd involvement.
2. Nah it was just funny that Debo was brought up. And I think Deuce was serious too. Hahahahah
3. When I think of a MONSTER, I think of a physical brute. I look at style. As my man DangerousG said, Taker was more athletic and less power. Vader gave you power and athleticism. Umaga gave you both as well. Brock gave you both as well. Taker isn't/wasn't a physically DOMINATING wrestler. Spiritually/psychologically, sure. BUt he doesn't have a BRUISING style as a monster should have. I consider Mark Henry more of a MONSTER than Taker.
Taker is more of an ATTRACTION than a monster. I think that is the word some are thinking of.
His wrestling style isn't punishing at all. The most punishing he was when he was the Biker Dude
'll try to find an American match and you'd still be wrong, fully aware of DC style of posts)
Taker is a good 6'8 and HUGE. How you can say he is not physically bute or as powerful shows your lack of understanding what hell you've been watching. I mean really bruh? Taker has and always been designed as a monster character and has come off that way.