- Sep 4, 2006
- 48,666
- 28,944
...also probably Bruno during the 1960's into '70's
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh oh
Well, I was responding to what Lance Ito was saying. He introduced the concept of Seth could/should be carrying the company, so he shouldn't be in the opening match.
I view someone "Carrying" the company as someone that, if they left" the company would see a significant drop in viewership/attendance.
I don't think if Seth Rollins died tonight, WWE would see a drop in anything.
DC always twisting words but he talk about NTextremes......That’s not what was said...
In summary it was said you build the company around that guy, he should be on (close) to the main event because he is important. When you open the show it doesn’t show you’re a main eventer or you can support the company on your back, regardless of what Sullivan has or has not said. But continue with your narrative per usual.
Side note: It was also said (by me) I enjoyed the match but it was a burn off.
Becky's tweet above does not come off as full heel.
She had to slip in that she was morally justified and depicted as the victim.
Maybe this is exactly want they want from her? If not, she ain't even trying.
That whole era os cringe worthy
I think Seth could carry the company
Yeah, I wonder if she even studies heels or if she is confusing being “edgy” with being a heel.
So based on how SS was actually structured, where would you have put Seth/Dolph? - Here are the results, in order:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SummerSlam_(2018)#Results
ill hate bi target employee forever for thatdidnt they do that already and he killed Sting
at this point, it really doesn't matter. marks going to complain one way or the other regarding who should be the top guy and they'll still end up watching the product
didnt they do that already and he killed Sting
at this point, it really doesn't matter. marks going to complain one way or the other regarding who should be the top guy and they'll still end up watching the product
nah, seth was wreckless. he's a lot more careful but dude was really ******* up.Wasn't that the result of Sting just being old though? I don't think he or Sting did anything wrong there. Just shouldn't have done a powerbomb buckle spot to a (IIRC) 56 year old
He was a heel at that point and nowhere near as over as he is now
Not the same
During the JJ Security days?he was over as a heel too. he was getting great reactions from the crowd and playing that slimy heel
nah, seth was wreckless. he's a lot more careful but dude was really ****ing up.
finn out with that shoulder and ruined his momentum
broke cena's nose and nearly put a ppv match in jeopardy
injured and forced the legend Sting before he could even chalk up a solo W in the wwe
The Finn one was both their faults IMO. Seth for not throwing him close enough and Finn for putting his arm backnah, seth was wreckless. he's a lot more careful but dude was really ****ing up.
finn out with that shoulder and ruined his momentum
broke cena's nose and nearly put a ppv match in jeopardy
The Finn one was both their faults IMO. Seth for not throwing him close enough and Finn for putting his arm back
The Cena one was on him though