- 665
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
and again
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
ninjahood wrote:
the SECOND chart applies to EVERYONE...if you took your eyeballs and focused them on da chart at hand, you would've SEEN
that genuis.
Originally released in 1996, the Reebok Question is one of, if not the, best-selling Reebok sneakers ever created. Upon its release, the Reebok Question broke sales numbers for Reebok, allowing Reebok to sign A.I. to a long-term sneaker contract that is still active today. Allen Iverson broke ankles with his handles and broke necks with the Reebok Question, his first signature sneaker.
http://best.complex.com/lists/Top-50-Basketball-Sneakers-of-All-Time/reebok-question
you let me know when you ready to wave that white flag.
and lemme laugh at you in advance if you think ANYTHING in adidas outsells its superstar shelltoe sneaker which is ALSO a RETRO.
Ehem.... one more time, where does the stats that you've posted, even suggest this,
because retro sneakers is where da MAJORITY of da sneaker industry makes their paper at
It does not say this. So until you post something that will even hint at what you've stated, all of the bravado that you are suggesting, really is all for naught.
ninjahood wrote:
the SECOND chart applies to EVERYONE...if you took your eyeballs and focused them on da chart at hand, you would've SEEN
that genuis.
Originally released in 1996, the Reebok Question is one of, if not the, best-selling Reebok sneakers ever created. Upon its release, the Reebok Question broke sales numbers for Reebok, allowing Reebok to sign A.I. to a long-term sneaker contract that is still active today. Allen Iverson broke ankles with his handles and broke necks with the Reebok Question, his first signature sneaker.
http://best.complex.com/lists/Top-50-Basketball-Sneakers-of-All-Time/reebok-question
you let me know when you ready to wave that white flag.
and lemme laugh at you in advance if you think ANYTHING in adidas outsells its superstar shelltoe sneaker which is ALSO a RETRO.
Ehem.... one more time, where does the stats that you've posted, even suggest this,
because retro sneakers is where da MAJORITY of da sneaker industry makes their paper at
It does not say this. So until you post something that will even hint at what you've stated, all of the bravado that you are suggesting, really is all for naught.
It’s the No. 1 seller in the history of athletic footwear,
It’s the No. 1 seller in the history of athletic footwear,
Originally Posted by ninjahood
listen if u can't read that da MOST of reeboks best sellers were retros then i dunno what u tell you duke...seems u da slow type smell me?
same applies to nike, same applies to adidas.
because retro sneakers is where da MAJORITY of da sneaker industry makes their paper at
I "smell" you, because you are simply full of it.
There are many different variables when it come to the final tally, and "fashion" does not equate with "retro".
Originally Posted by ninjahood
listen if u can't read that da MOST of reeboks best sellers were retros then i dunno what u tell you duke...seems u da slow type smell me?
same applies to nike, same applies to adidas.
because retro sneakers is where da MAJORITY of da sneaker industry makes their paper at
I "smell" you, because you are simply full of it.
There are many different variables when it come to the final tally, and "fashion" does not equate with "retro".
Originally Posted by mjvc
If I remember correctly while back it was much talk why Nike wasn't supporting the NFL or whatever instead Reebok. It was because there was no real money to be made in it. They wouldn't be making killings off of it and more trouble then worth. This was coming from very reputable ppl that use to be on here all the time. I haven't seen them on here in forever now. Yet Reebok loses the NFL contract it's the end for them. They lost the NFL they will go broke!? Skechers stays running?! All they make is CRAP!! What the hell do they sponsor. Why can't Reebok just go on about the way they are doing things. Too many ppl blinded by swoosh I guess and have such hate for Reebok. Reebok is no NIKE so quit trying to compare them to NIKE!!
Originally Posted by mjvc
If I remember correctly while back it was much talk why Nike wasn't supporting the NFL or whatever instead Reebok. It was because there was no real money to be made in it. They wouldn't be making killings off of it and more trouble then worth. This was coming from very reputable ppl that use to be on here all the time. I haven't seen them on here in forever now. Yet Reebok loses the NFL contract it's the end for them. They lost the NFL they will go broke!? Skechers stays running?! All they make is CRAP!! What the hell do they sponsor. Why can't Reebok just go on about the way they are doing things. Too many ppl blinded by swoosh I guess and have such hate for Reebok. Reebok is no NIKE so quit trying to compare them to NIKE!!
Originally Posted by 3onPar5
Around here Reebok is not a player unless you are a 50 yr old grandmother.
Originally Posted by 3onPar5
Around here Reebok is not a player unless you are a 50 yr old grandmother.
I "smell" you, because you are simply full of it.Originally Posted by Nat Turner
Originally Posted by ninjahood
listen if u can't read that da MOST of reeboks best sellers were retros then i dunno what u tell you duke...seems u da slow type smell me?
same applies to nike, same applies to adidas.
No, that is not what it says, nor what you stated, you said,
because retro sneakers is where da MAJORITY of da sneaker industry makes their paper at