- 8,306
- 725
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2007
JB consolidated multiple signature Jordans into one shoe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
but you do have to consider that the og's were made to play basketball in. now that retros are a fashion statement for casual use (even more thanbefore), the brand doesnt have to care about performance or quality. what makes me really mad now is how they are retroing and making low quality versions ofthe NEWER shoes i.e. 2/21 cdp, 6/17 cdp etc that are still meant to be played in by many people's standardsOriginally Posted by djness23
notice how something og always starts off in good material, then once they retro they degrade, i guess that is the purpose of ogs being best
Originally Posted by hypeNT500
i own all jordan and can notice that spizikes are put together with better quality material than the III, IV, VIII etc.....
An excellent question and even better answer! Thanks Method Man for being on point!Originally Posted by Method Man
the spizikes are put to gether very well also use good quality material. as far as the xx3 the design and the way they put it together without any glue is advanced with low cost to make.
basically the spizikes use more quality material and cost more to make hence the price. just because the XX3 has better technology as far as support for a basketball shoe doesn't mean it takes alot of money to put together.
I agree with you bro...all these people who don't have any should not be talking. I own the cements and kingz county and can say the quality isgreat. Besides they combine all the standout traits of popular jordans. The Jordan IIIs sole is integral to the Jordan III, the Rubber tongue is a key featureof the VIs, and the lace locks and and Jordan V ankle brace is outstanding. I think they are expensive becuase they combine all the things that make otherJordans great and they do it in style. I have alot of Js but have never received as many compliments from non Jordan heads as I do when I rock spizikes..thereis just something about em.Originally Posted by hypeNT500
the spizikes are put to gether very well also use good quality material. as far as the xx3 the design and the way they put it together without any glue is advanced with low cost to make.
basically the spizikes use more quality material and cost more to make hence the price. just because the XX3 has better technology as far as support for a basketball shoe doesn't mean it takes alot of money to put together.
Originally Posted by tpham211
i dont know why this post still is going on when method answered the questions 5 posts down. kudos, nt staff.
Originally Posted by krazy88s
It's called business. That's why.
^^^^ Word. Thats a good answer.Originally Posted by bigpony123
that's ******ed that a non-signature shoe can be worth as much as a signature one. i myself have a pair of spizikes and the quality is superb compared to the retro's that have been released lately. So what does that say about JB, the consumer, the collectors? are we being cheated taken advantage of. we spend all this money on these new retro's trying to keep up with our collection thinking that JB is giving us good quality, but instead we are getting bogus retro's and BS packs. Why buy 5 b grade retro's when you can get it all in one with the spizike!!! maybe JB was trying to save us some money with this shoe, and we thought opposite, shame on us!!! hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!